AD 2005-24-03
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | 737-600 | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, and -800 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Inadequate fastener clamp-up due to installation of only one washer instead of two on certain attachment fasteners between the nacelle support fittings and the lower wing skin panels, which could result in cracking of the fastener holes, cracking along the lower wing skin panels, fuel leaking from the wing fuel tanks onto the engines, and possible fire.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect and measure the length of the attachment fasteners between the nacelle support fittings and the lower wing skin panels. Perform investigative and corrective actions if necessary, as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57-1275, Revision 1, dated August 18, 2005.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before the accumulation of 30,000 flight cycles or 30,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, and -800 series airplanes, as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57-1275, Revision 1, dated August 18, 2005.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, and -800 series airplanes. This AD requires inspecting/measuring the length of the attachment fasteners between the nacelle support fittings and the lower wing skin panels, and related investigative/corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from a report from the manufacturer that in production, during the installation of certain attachment fasteners for the nacelle support fittings, only one washer was installed instead of two. We are issuing this AD to prevent inadequate fastener clamp-up, which could result in cracking of the fastener holes, cracking along the lower wing skin panels, fuel leaking from the wing fuel tanks onto the engines, and possible fire.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70713-70715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 05-23056]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-19682; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-88-AD;
Amendment 39-14383; AD 2005-24-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, and
-800 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, and -800 series airplanes.
This AD requires inspecting/measuring the length of the attachment
fasteners between the nacelle support fittings and the lower wing skin
panels, and related investigative/corrective actions if necessary. This
AD results from a report from the manufacturer that in production,
during the installation of certain attachment fasteners for the nacelle
support fittings, only one washer was installed instead of two. We are
issuing this AD to prevent inadequate fastener clamp-up, which could
result in cracking of the fastener holes, cracking along the lower wing
skin panels, fuel leaking from the wing fuel tanks onto the engines,
and possible fire.
DATES: This AD becomes effective December 28, 2005.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 28,
2005.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL-401, Washington, DC.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, PO Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for service information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
917-6440; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain Boeing Model
737-600, -700, -700C, and -800 series airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on November 24, 2004 (69 FR 68268).
That NPRM proposed to require inspecting/measuring the length of the
attachment fasteners between the nacelle support fittings and the lower
wing skin panels, and related investigative/corrective actions if
necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Support for the NPRM
One commenter supports the actions described in the NPRM.
Notice of Service Bulletin Revision
One commenter, the manufacturer, notes that there is an error in
the variable numbers listed in the effectivity of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-57-1275, dated September 4, 2003 (which was referenced as
the appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
proposed actions). The commenter states that this error is corrected in
the next revision of the service bulletin and that correcting this
error in the service bulletin will not alter the NPRM's applicability.
We agree with the commenter that the applicability of this AD is
not affected by the change in variable numbers. The applicability of
this AD refers to the airplane line numbers and not to the variable
numbers.
[[Page 70714]]
Since the issuance of the NPRM, Boeing has issued Service Bulletin
737-57-1275, Revision 1, dated August 18, 2005, which contains the same
procedures as the original issue along with the corrected variable
numbers. Revision 1 of the service bulletin also divides the
effectivity into four groups in order to provide clarification on the
different fastener installation configurations. We have revised this AD
to reference Revision 1 as the appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the required actions. We have also added
paragraph (h) to this AD to give credit for actions done before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with the original issue of the
service bulletin.
Clarification of Sealant Specification
One commenter notes that Figures 1 and 2 of Boeing Service Bulletin
737-57-1275, dated September 4, 2003, specify an obsolete sealant. The
commenter states that the ``Parts and Materials Supplied by the
Operator'' section of the service bulletin specifies to refer to the
Qualified Parts List (QPL) at the end of the Boeing Material
Specification (BMS) for supplier data; however, there is no QPL for BMS
5-26 because it is obsolete. The commenter points out that BMS 5-45 has
superseded BMS 5-26.
We agree with the commenter that BMS 5-45 is the correct
specification for the sealant. Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57-1275,
Revision 1, dated August 18, 2005, does contain the correct references
to BMS 5-45. As stated previously, we have revised this AD to reference
Revision 1 as the appropriate source of service information for
accomplishing the required actions. No further work is necessary for
airplanes on which Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57-1275, dated September
4, 2003, was accomplished.
Request To Revise Compliance Time
One commenter requests that we revise the compliance time specified
in paragraph (f)(2) of the NPRM from prior to the accumulation of
``30,000 flight cycles or 30,000 flight hours, whichever is first'' to
prior to the accumulation of ``30,000 flight cycles or 37,000 flight
hours, whichever is first.'' The commenter states that 15 of its
airplanes are not scheduled for a heavy ``C'' check maintenance within
the 30,000-flight-hour window and the proposed compliance time would
result in unnecessary financial hardship. No technical justification
was provided.
We do not agree with the commenter to revise the compliance time.
In developing an appropriate compliance time, we considered the safety
implications, the manufacturer's recommendation, and normal maintenance
schedules for timely accomplishment of the inspection. We have
determined that the compliance time, as proposed, represents the
maximum interval of time allowable for the affected airplanes to
continue to safely operate before the inspection is done. However,
paragraph (i) of this AD provides affected operators the opportunity to
apply for an adjustment of the compliance time if the operator also
presents data that justify the adjustment. We have not revised this AD
in this regard.
Explanation of Change Made to This AD
Boeing Commercial Airplanes has received a Delegation Option
Authorization (DOA). We have revised this AD to delegate the authority
to approve an alternative method of compliance for any repair required
by this AD to an Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes DOA rather than a Designated Engineering Representative
(DER).
Clarification of Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph
We have revised this AD to clarify the appropriate procedure for
notifying the principal inspector before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 751 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Average Cost per U.S.-
Action Work hours labor rate Parts airplane registered Fleet cost
per hour airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection/Measurement.......................... 12 $65 Nominal......................... $780 302 $235,560
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with
[[Page 70715]]
this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section for a
location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2005-24-03 Boeing: Amendment 39-14383. Docket No. FAA-2005-19682;
Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-88-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective December 28, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, and -
800 series airplanes; line numbers 1 through 761 inclusive, except
for line numbers 596, 683, 742, 749, 750, 751, 754, 755, 759, and
760; certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by a report from the manufacturer that
in production, during installation of certain attachment fasteners
for the nacelle support fittings, only one washer was installed
instead of two. We are issuing this AD to prevent inadequate
fastener clamp-up, which could result in cracking of the fastener
holes, cracking along the lower wing skin panels, fuel leaking from
the wing fuel tanks onto the engines, and possible fire.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection/Measurement and Related Investigative and Corrective Actions
(f) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (f)(1) or
(f)(2) of this AD: Inspect/measure the length of certain attachment
fasteners between the lower wing skin panels and the nacelle support
fittings. Do the inspection/measurement, and all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57-1275,
Revision 1, dated August 18, 2005, except as provided by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes modified by Supplemental Type Certificate
(STC) ST00830SE as of the effective date of this AD: Prior to the
accumulation of 25,000 total flight hours or 25,000 total flight
cycles, whichever is first.
(2) For airplanes not modified by STC ST00830SE as of the
effective date of this AD: Prior to the accumulation of 30,000 total
flight hours or 30,000 total flight cycles, whichever is first.
(g) If accomplishing a corrective action as required by
paragraph (f) of this AD, and the service bulletin specifies to
contact Boeing for repair information: Before further flight, do the
repair using a method approved in accordance with paragraph (i) of
this AD.
Actions Accomplished According to Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(h) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57-1275, dated September
4, 2003, are considered acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding action specified in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with 14 CFR
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57-1275, Revision
1, dated August 18, 2005, to perform the actions that are required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this
document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for a copy of this service information. You
may review copies at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 10, 2005.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-23056 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.