AD 2005-13-15
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-200C Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-400 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-500 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-600 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-700 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-700C Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-800 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-900 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, - 400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
The secondary fuel vapor barrier was not applied correctly to, or was missing from, certain areas of the wing center section, which could result in fuel or fuel vapors leaking into the cargo or passenger compartments and coming into contact with a possible ignition source, leading to fire or explosion.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a one-time detailed inspection for discrepancies of the secondary fuel vapor barrier of the wing center section. Take related investigative/corrective actions if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the compliance times specified in the AD, unless the actions have already been done.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes, certificated in any category, with specific line number ranges as listed in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, -400, -500, -600, -700, - 700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. This AD requires a one-time detailed inspection for discrepancies of the secondary fuel vapor barrier of the wing center section, and related investigative/ corrective actions if necessary. This AD is prompted by reports that the secondary fuel vapor barrier was not applied correctly to, or was missing from, certain areas of the wing center section. We are issuing this AD to prevent fuel or fuel vapors from leaking into the cargo or passenger compartments and coming into contact with a possible ignition source, which could result in fire or explosion.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36486-36488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 05-12315]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2004-19567; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-118-AD;
Amendment 39-14152; AD 2005-13-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, -
400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -
700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. This AD requires a one-time
detailed inspection for discrepancies of the secondary fuel vapor
barrier of the wing center section, and related investigative/
corrective actions if necessary. This AD is prompted by reports that
the secondary fuel vapor barrier was not applied correctly to, or was
missing from, certain areas of the wing center section. We are issuing
this AD to prevent fuel or fuel vapors from leaking into the cargo or
passenger compartments and coming into contact with a possible ignition
source, which could result in fire or explosion.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July 29, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the AD is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July
29, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124
2207.
Docket: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any
final disposition. You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at
<a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>, or in person at the Docket Management Facility
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW, room PL-401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is Docket No. FAA-2004-19567; the
directorate identifier for this docket is 2004-NM-118-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Pegors, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone
(425) 917-6504; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39
with an AD for certain Boeing Model 737-200, -200C, -300, -400, -500, -
600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. That action,
published in the Federal Register on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65099),
proposed to require a one-time detailed inspection for discrepancies of
the secondary fuel vapor barrier of the wing center section, and
related investigative/corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments that have been
submitted on the proposed AD.
Agreement With Proposed AD
One commenter, an operator, agrees with the proposed AD.
Request for Alternative Procedure
One commenter, an operator, requests that a note be added to
paragraph (g) of the AD to allow the use of Boeing 737 Nondestructive
Testing (NDT) Manual, Part 6, Section 53-30-27, paragraph 3, for
determining vapor barrier thickness. The commenter contends that using
this method for determining vapor barrier thickness provides an
inspection procedure equivalent to that called out in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-1261, dated February 27, 2003, and
will allow operators to avoid any need for special tooling.
We do not agree. We have reviewed the specified section of the NDT
manual and found that it does not adequately
[[Page 36487]]
describe an inspection procedure that is equivalent to that described
in the service bulletin. However, we infer from the comment that the
operator is proposing the use of an alternate tool for measuring
coating thickness. Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-
1261, dated February 27, 2003, page 40, paragraph F., note (a), states
that the isoscope with the probe listed in paragraph F. is only one
example of a nonconductive coating thickness gage (NCCTG) that may be
used and that any NCCTG is acceptable as long as it has a thickness
range from 0.001 to 0.045 inch. We have confirmed with the manufacturer
that the service bulletin clearly states the requirements for the
tooling required to measure the thickness of the vapor barrier and no
additional guidance is required. We have not changed the final rule in
this regard.
Request for Extended Compliance Time
One commenter, an operator, requests that the compliance time be
extended from 48 to 72 months. The commenter states that, assuming an
effective date for the AD of January 2005, it has 15 aircraft that will
not be scheduled for C check maintenance within the proposed 48-month
compliance time. The commenter believes that this out-of-phase
maintenance would result in financial hardship; therefore, the
commenter would like to see the compliance time extended as requested.
We do not agree. In developing an appropriate compliance time for
this action, we considered the urgency associated with the subject
unsafe condition and the practical aspect of accomplishing the required
modification within a period of time that corresponds to the normal
scheduled maintenance for most affected operators. However, under the
provisions of paragraph (i) of the final rule, we may approve requests
for adjustments to the compliance time if data are submitted with the
requests to substantiate that such adjustments would provide acceptable
levels of safety. We have not changed the final rule in this regard.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments that have been submitted, and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
This AD will affect about 1,521 airplanes of U.S. registry. There
are about 3,861 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide
fleet. We estimate the average labor rate to be $65 per work hour. We
estimate that it will take the number of work hours shown in the
following table to accomplish the actions for each airplane. Parts and
materials are standard and are to be supplied by the operator. Based on
these figures, the cost impact of the AD is estimated to range between
$325 and $910 per airplane.
Estimated Work Hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane Work
Affected airplanes as listed in group hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57- 1 14
1250, Revision 1, dated September 4, 2003........ 2 12
3 5
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57- 1 14
1261, dated February 27, 2003.................... 2 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2005-13-15 Boeing: Amendment 39-14152. Docket No. FAA-2004-19567;
Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-118-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective July 29, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
[[Page 36488]]
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes listed in Table 1 of this
AD, certificated in any category:
Table 1.--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model Line numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
737-200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 311 through 3132 inclusive.
series airplanes.
737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 1 through 1088 inclusive and
series airplanes. 1090 through 1134 inclusive.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD is prompted by reports that the secondary fuel vapor
barrier was not applied correctly to, or was missing from, certain
areas of the wing center section. We are issuing this AD to prevent
fuel or fuel vapors from leaking into the cargo or passenger
compartments and coming into contact with a possible ignition
source, which could result in fire or explosion.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Service Bulletin References
(f) The term ``service bulletin,'' as used in this AD, means the
Accomplishment Instructions of the following service bulletins, as
applicable:
(1) For Model 737-200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-1261,
dated February 27, 2003; and
(2) For Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series
airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-1250,
Revision 1, dated September 4, 2003.
Inspection
(g) Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
one-time detailed inspection for discrepancies of the secondary fuel
vapor barrier of the wing center section; and if discrepancies
exist, before further flight, do any applicable related
investigative/corrective actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive visual examination of a specific structural area,
system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a
direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by
the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses,
etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures
may be required.''
Actions Accomplished per Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(h) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-57-
1250, dated February 7, 2002, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding actions specified in paragraph (g)
of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
57-1261, dated February 27, 2003; or Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-57-1250, Revision 1, dated September 4, 2003;
as applicable; to perform the actions that are required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approves the incorporation by reference of these documents
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. For copies of
the service information, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O.
Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. To view the AD docket, go
to the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC.
For information on the availability of this material at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), call (202) 741-
6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 10, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12315 Filed 6-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.