AD 2005-13-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | 747-400F | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400F Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking found on the upper deck floor beam to frame attachment points, leading to potential failure of the upper deck floor beams, which could result in damage to critical flight control cables and wire bundles, loss of controllability, and rapid decompression of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Initial detailed and open-hole high frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, repair of any cracking, and a preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams. Repetitive inspections for cracking are required after the modification.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD or before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, whichever is later.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 747-400F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 747-400F series airplanes. This AD requires initial detailed and open-hole high frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, and repair of any cracking. This AD also requires a preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams, and repetitive inspections for cracking after accomplishing the modification. This AD is prompted by reports of fatigue cracking found on the upper deck floor beam to frame attachment points. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracks in the upper chord, upper chord strap, and the web of the upper deck floor beams and resultant failure of the floor beams. Failure of a floor beam could result in damage to critical flight control cables and wire bundles that pass through the floor beam, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. Failure of the floor beam also could result in the failure of the adjacent fuselage frames and skin, and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35989-35991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 05-12002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2004-19678; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-62-AD;
Amendment 39-14141; AD 2005-13-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400F Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 747-400F series airplanes. This AD requires
initial detailed and open-hole high frequency eddy current inspections
for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the
upper deck floor beams, and repair of any cracking. This AD also
requires a preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams, and
repetitive inspections for cracking after
[[Page 35990]]
accomplishing the modification. This AD is prompted by reports of
fatigue cracking found on the upper deck floor beam to frame attachment
points. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracks in the upper
chord, upper chord strap, and the web of the upper deck floor beams and
resultant failure of the floor beams. Failure of a floor beam could
result in damage to critical flight control cables and wire bundles
that pass through the floor beam, and consequent loss of
controllability of the airplane. Failure of the floor beam also could
result in the failure of the adjacent fuselage frames and skin, and
consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July 27, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in
the AD is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July
27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.
Docket: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any
final disposition. You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at
<a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>, or in person at the Docket Management Facility
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA-2004-19678; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2004-NM-62-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 917-6437;
fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39
with an AD for certain Boeing Model 747-400F series airplanes. That
action, published in the Federal Register on November 24, 2004 (69 FR
68277), proposed to require initial detailed and open-hole high
frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the web, upper
chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, and repair
of any cracking. That action also proposed to require a preventive
modification of the upper deck floor beams, and repetitive inspections
for cracking after accomplishing the modification.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments have been submitted on the proposed
AD or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
This AD affects about 53 airplanes worldwide and 13 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this AD, depending on the airplane
configuration:
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Number of
labor affected U.S.-
Action Work hours rate per Parts Cost per airplane registered Fleet cost
hour airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-modification inspections..... 11................... $65 $0................... $715................. 13 $9,295
Modification/Inspections done 498 or 524........... 65 $13,554 or $14,874... $45,924 or $48,934... 13 $597,012 or $636,142
during modification.
Post-modification inspections.... 66................... 65 $0................... $4,290, per 13 $55,770
inspection cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 35991]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2005-13-05 Boeing: Amendment 39-14141. Docket No. FAA-2004-19678;
Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-62-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective July 27, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability: (c) This AD applies to Model 747-400F series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as listed in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking found on
the upper deck floor beam to frame attachment points. We are issuing
this AD to prevent fatigue cracks in the upper chord, upper chord
strap, and web of the upper deck floor beams and the resultant
failure of the floor beams. Failure of a floor beam could result in
damage to critical flight control cables and wire bundles that pass
through the floor beam, and consequent loss of controllability of
the airplane. Failure of the floor beam also could result in the
failure of the adjacent fuselage frames and skin, and consequent
rapid decompression of the airplane.
Compliance: (e) You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified,
unless the actions have already been done.
Service Bulletin Reference
(f) For the purposes of this AD, the term ``service bulletin''
means the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002.
Inspections/Repair/Modification
(g) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever is later: Accomplish detailed and open-hole high frequency
eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking of the web, upper
chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, by doing
all the applicable actions in accordance with Part 3.B.1. of the
service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
(h) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, accomplish the
actions required by paragraph (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD.
(1) Repair in accordance with the service bulletin; except where
the service bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate
action, before further flight, repair in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or according to data meeting the type certification
basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing Company Designated
Engineering Representative (DER) who has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a repair method to
be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this
paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Accomplish the inspections and preventive modification of
the floor beams by doing all the actions in accordance with Part
3.B.2. or Part 3.B.3. of the service bulletin, as applicable. If any
crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair
as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
(i) If no crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD: Accomplish the actions required by either
paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD, at the time specified.
(1) Before further flight: Accomplish the inspections and
preventive modification of the floor beam by doing all the actions
in accordance with Part 3.B.2 or Part 3.B.3. of the service
bulletin, as applicable. If the preventive modification is performed
concurrently with the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, the upper chord straps must be removed when performing the open-
hole HFEC inspection. If any crack is found during any inspection,
before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD.
(2) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever is later: Accomplish the inspections and preventive
modification of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the actions
in accordance with Part 3.B.2. or 3.B.3. of the service bulletin, as
applicable. If any crack is found during any inspection, before
further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
Post-Modification Inspections
(j) Within 15,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the
applicable preventive modification required by paragraph (h)(2),
(i)(1), or (i)(2) of this AD: Accomplish the inspections required by
either paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD; if any crack is found
during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
(1) Accomplish detailed and surface HFEC inspections for
cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper
deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions in accordance
with Part 3.B.4. of the service bulletin. If no crack is found,
repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight
cycles.
(2) Accomplish detailed and open-hole HFEC inspections for
cracking of the web, upper chord, and strap of the upper deck floor
beams, by doing all the applicable actions in accordance with Part
3.B.5. of the service bulletin. If no crack is found, repeat the
inspections at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight cycles.
Note 2: There is no terminating action currently available for
the repetitive inspections required by this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by a
Boeing Company DER who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2443,
dated May 9, 2002, to perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approves the incorporation by reference of this document in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To get copies of
the service information, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O.
Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. To view the AD docket, go
to the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC. To review copies of the service
information, go to the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at the
NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 10, 2005.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12002 Filed 6-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.