AD 2005-04-08
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Hartzell Propeller, Inc. | HC-B3T | Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc. Model HC-B3TN- 5( )/T10282( ) Propellers |
| propeller | Hartzell Propeller, Inc. | HC-B3T | Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc. Model HC-B3TN- 5( )/T10282( ) Propellers |
Unsafe Condition
Possible blade failure near the hub which can result in blade separation, engine separation, damage to the airplane, and possible loss of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Within 10 hours time-in-service after the effective date, perform a document search to verify compliance with Priority Letter AD 88-24-15 or replacement of blades. If not compliant, inspect the blades using Paragraph 3 of Hartzell Service Bulletin No. 136, Revision Letter 'I', within 500 hours time-since-new or time-since-last-overhaul.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 10 hours time-in-service for document search; within 500 hours time-since-new or time-since-last-overhaul for inspection if not previously compliant.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN-5( )/T10282( ) propellers installed on Fairchild SA226-TC, SA226-AT, and SA226-T airplanes with Garrett TPE331-10UA-511G engines, excluding propellers with blades part number T10282N( ), T10282NB( ), T10282NK( ), or T10282NE( ). Also includes airplanes with Supplemental Type Certificates SA344GL-D, SA4872SW, and SA345GL-D.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is superseding an existing Priority Letter Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN- 5( )/T10282( ) propellers. That AD currently requires initial and repetitive inspections of the blade pilot tube bore area. This ad requires the same inspections. This AD results from a review of all currently effective ADs. That review determined that Priority Letter AD 88-24-15 was not published in the Federal Register to make it effective to all operators, as opposed to just the operators who received actual notice of the original Priority Letter AD. This AD also results from the discovery that the original AD omitted an airplane model with a certain Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) from the applicability. We are issuing this AD to prevent possible blade failure near the hub which can result in blade separation, engine separation, damage to the airplane, and possible loss of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8507-8509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 05-3046]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-NE-50-AD; Amendment 39-13980; AD 2005-04-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc. Model HC-B3TN-
5( )/T10282( ) Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing Priority Letter
Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN-
5( )/T10282( ) propellers. That AD currently requires initial and
repetitive inspections of the blade pilot tube bore area. This ad
requires the same inspections. This AD results from a review of all
currently effective ADs. That review determined that Priority Letter AD
88-24-15 was not published in the Federal Register to make it effective
to all operators, as opposed to just the operators who received actual
notice of the original Priority Letter AD. This AD also results from
the discovery that the original AD omitted an airplane model with a
certain Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) from the applicability. We
are issuing this AD to prevent possible blade failure near the hub
which can result in blade separation, engine separation, damage to the
airplane, and possible loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 29, 2005. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations as of March 29, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Contact Hartzell Propeller Inc. Technical Publications
Department, One Propeller Place, Piqua, OH 45356; telephone (937) 778-
4200; fax (937) 778-4391, for the service information identified in
this AD.
You may examine the AD docket at the FAA, New England Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. You may examine the service information, at the FAA,
New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/
federal--register/
[[Page 8508]]
code--of--federal--regulations/ibr--locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa T. Bradley, Aerospace
Engineer, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018; telephone
(847) 294-8110; fax (847) 294-7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39
with a proposed airworthiness directive (AD). The proposed AD applies
to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN-5( )/T10282( ) propellers. We
published the proposed AD in the Federal Register on July 22, 2004 (69
FR 43775). That action proposed to require initial and repetitive
inspections of the blade pilot tube bore area.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD Docket (including any comments and service
information), by appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. See ADDRESSES for the
location.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the one comment received.
Request To Change the Compliance Time
One commenter, Hartzell Propeller Inc., requests that we change the
compliance time to a much more aggressive compliance requirement, to
the point of grounding those operators who did not follow the Priority
Letter AD, regardless of whether they were legally obligated to do so
or not. The commenter states that the NPRM we published, which is 16
years beyond the Priority Letter AD effective date, extends compliance
to 500 hours after the effective date of the yet-to-be published final
rule AD. The Priority Letter AD either identified, or was the result
of, cracks found on two blades installed in the same propeller, and two
occurrences of blade separation on two other propellers. All events
were from fractures initiating at the same general location in the
blade bore. Hartzell issued Service Bulletin No. 161, dated May 18,
1989, as a counterpart to the Priority Letter AD. Hartzell further
states that since many operators of this type of aircraft overhaul
their propellers, compliance to the Priority Letter AD was likely
accomplished, intentionally or otherwise, as part of the overhaul
process. However, if an operator did not receive or acknowledge the
Priority Letter AD, and if they did not overhaul their propellers, they
are flying at increased risk of failure. Hartzell further states that
the published NPRM provides inappropriate relaxation and should be
revised.
We do not agree. To justify the suggested change in compliance
time, we would need supporting data. However, service history has shown
that there has been no occurrence of this failure mode subsequent to
the issuance of the Priority Letter AD.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comment received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
By adding STC SA345GL to the applicability, there are about 50
additional Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN-5( )/T10282( )
propellers of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. Including the
additional applicability, we estimate a total of 500 propellers have
been installed on airplanes of U.S. registry and would be affected by
this AD. We also estimate that it would take about 2.5 work hours per
propeller blade to perform the actions, and that the average labor rate
is $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the total
cost of the AD to U.S. operators is $243,750.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by
sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include
``AD Docket No. 2003-NE-50-AD'' in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39-13980, to read as follows:
2005-04-08 Hartzell Propeller Inc.: Amendment 39-13980. Docket No.
2003-NE-50-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective March 29, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes Priority Letter AD 88-24-15.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Hartzell Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN-5(
)/T10282( ) propellers installed on the airplane and engine
combinations shown in the following Table 1 (excluding propellers
with blades part number (P/N) T10282N( ), T10282NB( ), T10282NK( ),
or T10282NE( ) installed).
[[Page 8509]]
Table 1.--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane model Propeller model Engine model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fairchild SA226-TC..............
Fairchild SA226-AT.............. HC-B3TN-5( )/ Garrett TPE331-
T10282( ). 10UA-511G
Fairchild SA226-T...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) For reference, airplanes incorporating Supplemental Type
Certificates (STCs) SA344GL-D, SA4872SW, and SA345GL-D have these
engine, propeller, and airplane combinations.
(e) The parentheses appearing in the propeller model number
indicates the presence or absence of an additional letter(s) that
varies the basic propeller model. This AD still applies regardless
of whether these letters are present or absent in the propeller
model designation.
Unsafe Condition
(f) This AD results from a review of all currently effective
ADs. That review determined that Priority Letter AD 88-24-15 was not
published in the Federal Register to make it effective to all
operators, as opposed to just the operators who received actual
notice of the original Priority Letter AD. This AD also results from
the discovery that the original AD omitted an airplane model with a
certain STC from the applicability. We are issuing this AD to
prevent possible blade failure near the hub which can result in
blade separation, engine separation, damage to the airplane, and
possible loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(g) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Required Actions
(h) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective
date of this AD, perform a document search to determine if the
following actions have been done:
(1) The propeller blades meet the initial and repetitive
compliance requirements of Priority Letter AD 88-24-15.
(2) The P/N T10282( ) propeller blades have been replaced with
P/N T10282N( ), T10282NB( ), T10282NK( ), or T10282NE( ) propeller
blades.
(i) If the actions in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD have
not been done, then do one of the following:
(1) Inspect the blades using Paragraph 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Hartzell Service Bulletin (SB) No. 136, Revision
Letter ``I,'' dated April 25, 2003, within 500 hours time-since-new
(TSN) or time-since-last-overhaul (TSLO) and not to exceed two years
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first; and
thereafter within 500 service-hour intervals; or
(2) Replace with P/N T10282N( ), T10282NB( ), T10282NK( ), or
T10282NE( ) propeller blades as applicable, within 500 hours TSN or
TSLO and not to exceed two years after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first.
(j) If the actions in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD have been
done, but not the actions in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, then do
the following:
(1) Inspect the blades within 500 hours since the last Hartzell
SB No. 136E, or later Revision, inspection, and thereafter within
500 service hour intervals, using Paragraph 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Hartzell SB No. 136, Revision Letter ``I,'' dated
April 25, 2003.
(2) Replace before further flight all blades showing evidence of
cracks or other unairworthy conditions, as noted in Hartzell SB No.
136, Revision Letter ``I,'' dated April 25, 2003, with airworthy
blades.
Hartzell SB No. 136
(k) Since Hartzell SB No. 136E was issued, the SB has been
revised to 136F, 136G, 136H, and 136I. Any of these revisions are
suitable for determining past compliance, as they are all approved
as alternative methods of compliance (AMOC). After the effective
date of this AD, compliance is restricted to SB No. 136, Revision
Letter ``I,'' or later versions when approved by an AMOC.
Optional Terminating Action
(l) Installation of propeller blades, P/N T10282N( ), T10282NB(
), T10282NK( ), or T10282NE( ) as applicable, onto a Hartzell
Propeller Inc. model HC-B3TN-5( ) propeller constitutes terminating
action to the inspections, repairs, and replacements specified in
paragraphs (i) through (j)(2) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(m) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, has the
authority to approve alternate methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use Hartzell SB No. 136 (HC-SB-61-136), Revison
Letter ``I,'' dated April 25, 2003, to perform the inspections
required by this AD. The Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of this service bulletin in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You can get a
copy from Hartzell Propeller Inc. Technical Publications Department,
One Propeller Place, Piqua, OH 45356; telephone (937) 778-4200; fax
(937) 778-4391. You can review copies at the FAA, New England
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive
Park, Burlington, MA, or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Related Information
(o) None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 11, 2005.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-3046 Filed 2-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.