AD 2005-04-03

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 33 (Friday, February 18, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8239-8241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 05-2843]



[[Page 8239]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2004-18999; Directorate Identifier 2003-NM-259-AD; 
Amendment 39-13975; AD 2005-04-03]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400, -400D, and -400F 
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain Boeing Model 747-400, -400D, and -400F series airplanes. This 
AD requires replacing at least one flap control unit (FCU) in the main 
equipment center with a new or modified FCU. This AD is prompted by a 
report indicating that, after takeoff, an airplane was required to 
return to the airport because the autopilot disengaged. The report also 
indicated that, after selecting flaps for landing, the flaps indication 
display did not indicate the flap setting, requiring the airplane to 
land in alternate flap mode. We are issuing this AD to prevent 
disconnection of autoland/autopilot functions and loss of primary flaps 
control and flaps indication display due to disengagement of all three 
FCUs at the same time, which could lead to a non-normal high speed 
landing with the flaps retracted, increased pilot workload, and 
possible runway departure at high speeds during landing.

DATES: This AD becomes effective March 25, 2005.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
the AD is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of March 
25, 2005.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207. You can examine this information at the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of 
this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
    Docket: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any 
final disposition. You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at 
<a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>, or in person at the Docket Management Facility 
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401, 
Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA-2004-18999; the directorate 
identifier for this docket is 2003-NM-259-AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Tsuji, Aerospace Engineer, 
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-
4056; telephone (425) 917-6487; fax (425) 917-6590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 
with an AD for certain Boeing Model 747-400, -400D, and -400F series 
airplanes. That action, published in the Federal Register on September 
7, 2004 (69 FR 54060), proposed to require replacing at least one flap 
control unit (FCU) in the main equipment center with a new or modified 
FCU.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the 
development of this AD. We have considered the comments that have been 
submitted on the proposed AD.

Agrees With Proposed AD

    One commenter agrees with the proposed AD.

Request To Reduce the Compliance Time

    One commenter requests that the compliance time specified in 
paragraph (f)(1) of the proposed AD be reduced. The commenter states 
that the 60-month compliance time is too long and should be shortened 
substantially due to the potential severity of the situation (i.e., 
landing without flaps) and the nature of the proposed modifications. 
The commenter believes that the availability of parts necessary to 
complete the modifications is not an issue.
    The FAA does not agree to reduce the compliance time specified in 
paragraph (f)(1) of the final rule. In developing the compliance time 
for this AD, we considered the average utilization rate of the affected 
fleet, the practical aspects of an orderly modification of the fleet 
during regular maintenance periods, and the availability of required 
parts as well as the safety implications of the identified unsafe 
condition. In addition, the low probability of the identified unsafe 
condition occurring (disengagement of all three flap control units 
(FCU) causing loss of primary flaps control and flaps indication 
display) and the existing operational manual bulletin that provides 
guidance to the crew for extending the flaps in alternate mode in the 
absence of indication are consistent with longer compliance times. 
Based on these factors, the proposed compliance time of 60 months after 
the effective date of the final rule was determined to be appropriate. 
Further, we arrived at the proposed compliance time with manufacturer 
concurrence. We have not changed the final rule in this regard.

Request To Remove Paragraph (g) of the Proposed AD

    One commenter requests that paragraph (g) of the proposed AD be 
removed. The commenter states that paragraph (g) of the proposed AD 
would require actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27-2319, 
dated January 24, 1991, to be done before or concurrently with 
paragraph (f) of the proposed AD. The commenter notes that the actions 
in paragraph (f) of the proposed AD are to be done according to Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 747-27A2386, dated March 13, 2003, and that the 
alert service bulletin specifies in paragraph 1.B. that ``you cannot 
make the changes in this service bulletin unless the changes given in 
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27-2319 are made.'' Thus, the commenter 
believes there is no need for paragraph (g) of the proposed AD.
    We do not agree to remove paragraph (g) of the final rule. We agree 
that paragraph (f) of the final rule requires the actions to be done 
``in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 747-27A2386, dated March 13, 2003'' and that paragraph 
1.B. of the alert service bulletin refers to the concurrent actions 
that are specified in paragraph (g) of the final rule. However, 
paragraph 1.B. of the alert service bulletin precedes the 
Accomplishment Instructions of the alert service bulletin. Because the 
Accomplishment Instructions of the alert service bulletin do not 
specify to do any concurrent action, paragraph (g) of the final rule is 
needed to clarify that the concurrent action must be done. We have not 
changed the final rule in this regard.

Request for Clarification of Test

    One commenter points out that paragraph 3.B.2. of the Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 747-27A2386 specifies that a built-in test equipment 
(BITE) test be done according to Chapter 27-51-51 of the Boeing 747-400 
airplane maintenance manual (AMM). The

[[Page 8240]]

commenter notes that there is no BITE test in either 27-51-00/501 or 
27-51-51/401 of the Boeing 747-400 AMM. The commenter contends the 
alert service bulletin refers to a test that does not exist and is not 
necessary. The commenter also states that the alert service bulletin 
specifies installing the FCU in accordance with Chapter 27-51-51 of the 
Boeing 747-400 AMM and that the referenced AMM specifies to do an 
operational test of the FCU that includes both a central maintenance 
computer initiated ground test and exercising the flaps through full 
travel to ensure proper operation and indication.
    We infer from the comment that the commenter requests that the 
reference to the BITE test be clarified. We partially agree. We 
acknowledge that paragraph 3.B.2. of the alert service bulletin 
specifies a BITE test be done according to Chapter 27-51-51 of the 
Boeing 747-400 AMM. However, Chapter 27-51-51 of the Boeing 747-400 AMM 
refers to a BITE test only in the summary of the AMM procedure, but not 
within the body of the AMM procedure. Within the body of the AMM 
procedure, there is a ``GROUND TEST,'' under the heading ``OPERATIONAL 
TEST,'' that is to be done following installation of the FCU. Although 
the nomenclature within the Boeing documents may seem inconsistent, we 
consider the ``GROUND TEST'' specified in Chapter 27-51-51 of the 
Boeing 747-400 AMM to be part of the FCU BITE test. Furthermore, 
Chapter 27-51-51 of the Boeing 747-400 AMM includes all necessary 
testing that must be done following installation of a new FCU. In 
addition, because the final rule references only the alert service 
bulletin, there is no need to add a clarification of the BITE test to 
the final rule. We have not changed the final rule in this regard.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the 
comments that have been submitted, and determined that air safety and 
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 614 airplanes of the affected design worldwide. 
This AD will affect about 87 airplanes of U.S. registry. The following 
tables provide the estimated costs for U.S. operators to comply with 
this AD.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Average
                         Replacement                           Work hours   labor rate     Parts       Cost per
                                                                             per hour                  airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With new -208 FCU...........................................            2          $65      $78,550      $78,680
With modified -208 FCU......................................           10           65          975        1,625
-------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Estimated Concurrent Service Bulletin Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With new -207 FCU...........................................            3           65      235,650      235,845
With modified -207 FCU......................................           87           65        2,925        8,580
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a 
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to 
examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, 
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2005-04-03 Boeing: Amendment 39-13975. Docket No. FAA-2004-18999; 
Directorate Identifier 2003-NM-259-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective March 25, 2005.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Model 747-400, -400D, and -400F series 
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 747-27A2386, dated March 13, 2003.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD was prompted by a report indicating that, after 
takeoff, an airplane was required to return to the airport because 
the autopilot disengaged. The report also

[[Page 8241]]

indicated that, after selecting flaps for landing, the flaps 
indication display did not indicate the flap setting, requiring the 
airplane to land in alternate flap mode. We are issuing this AD to 
prevent disconnection of autoland/autopilot functions and loss of 
primary flaps control and flaps indication display due to 
disengagement of all three flap control units (FCUs) at the same 
time, which could lead to a non-normal high speed landing with the 
flaps retracted, increased pilot workload, and possible runway 
departure at high speeds during landing.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Replace FCU

    (f) At the earliest of the times specified in paragraphs (f)(1), 
(f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD: Replace at least one FCU having P/N 
285U0011-207 with a new or modified FCU having P/N 285U0011-208 in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 747-27A2386, dated March 13, 2003.
    (1) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Within 25,000 flight hours after the effective date of this 
AD.
    (3) Within 4,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this 
AD.

    Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-27A2386, dated March 
13, 2003, refers to Boeing Component Service Bulletin 285U0011-27-
06, dated March 13, 2003, as an additional source of service 
information for modifying an FCU having P/N 285U0011-207 to P/N 
285U0011-208.

Actions Required Before or Concurrently With Paragraph (f)

    (g) For airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27-
2319, dated January 24, 1991: Before or concurrent with the 
accomplishment of paragraph (f) of this AD, replace the three FCUs 
having P/N 285U0011-205 or 285U0011-206 with new or modified FCUs 
having P/N 285U0011-207 in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27-2319, dated January 
24, 1991.

    Note 2: Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27-2319, dated January 24, 
1991, refers to Boeing Component Service Bulletin 285U0011-27-04, 
dated January 24, 1991, as an additional source of service 
information for modifying the FCUs having P/N 285U0011-205 or 
285U0011-206 to P/N 285U0011-207.

Parts Installation

    (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install 
on any airplane an FCU having P/N 285U0011-205 or -206.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (i) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has 
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-27A2386, 
dated March 13, 2003; and Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27-2319, dated 
January 24, 1991; as applicable; to perform the actions that are 
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director 
of the Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference of 
these documents in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
51. For copies of the service information, contact Boeing Commercial 
Airplanes, PO Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. For 
information on the availability of this material at the National 
Archives and Records Administration (NARA), call (202) 741-6030, or 
go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>. You may view the AD docket at the 
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street SW., room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 3, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-2843 Filed 2-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P