AD 2004-13-23
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-82 (MD-82) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) and DC-9-83 (MD-83) Airplanes; and Model MD-88 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-83 (MD-83) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) and DC-9-83 (MD-83) Airplanes; and Model MD-88 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-88 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) and DC-9-83 (MD-83) Airplanes; and Model MD-88 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Insufficient engagement of the captain's and first officer's seat track locking pins caused by seat track misalignment, which could result in uncommanded movement of the seats during takeoff and landing, potentially interfering with the operation of the airplane and causing temporary loss of control.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a detailed inspection of the captain's and first officer's seat track locking pins for sufficient engagement, and take any applicable corrective actions as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-25A367, Revision 01, dated June 14, 2002. Any corrective actions must be completed before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 6 months after the effective date of the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) and DC-9-83 (MD-83) airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-25A367, Revision 01, dated June 14, 2002, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) and DC-9-83 (MD-83) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes, that requires inspection of the captain's and first officer's seat track locking pins for insufficient engagement caused by seat track misalignment, and corrective actions if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent uncommanded movement of the captain's and first officer's seats during takeoff and landing, which could result in interference with the operation of the airplane and consequent temporary loss of control of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 131 (Friday, July 9, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41419-41421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 04-15378]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-NM-251-AD; Amendment 39-13705; AD 2004-13-23]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) and
DC-9-83 (MD-83) Airplanes; and Model MD-88 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) and DC-9-83
(MD-83) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes, that requires inspection
of the captain's and first officer's seat track locking pins for
insufficient engagement caused by seat track misalignment, and
corrective actions if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent
uncommanded movement of the captain's and first officer's seats during
takeoff and landing, which could result in interference with the
operation of the airplane and consequent temporary loss of control of
the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Effective August 13, 2004.
The incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 13, 2004.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and
Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may be
examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the National
Archives
[[Page 41420]]
and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheyenne Del Carmen, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5338; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82
(MD-82) and DC-9-83 (MD-83) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes; was
published in the Federal Register on March 11, 2004 (69 FR 11550). That
action proposed to require inspection of the captain's and first
officer's seat track locking pins for insufficient engagement caused by
seat track misalignment, and corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 1,166 airplanes of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 672 airplanes of U.S.
registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1
work hour per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that
the average labor rate is $65 per work hour. Based on these figures,
the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $43,680
or $65 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions. Manufacturer warranty remedies may be available
for labor costs associated with this AD. As a result, the costs
attributable to the AD may be less than stated above.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2004-13-23 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-13705. Docket 2003-NM-
251-AD.
Applicability: Model DC-9-82 (MD-82) and DC-9-83 (MD-83)
airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes; as listed in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-25A367, Revision 01, dated June 14, 2002;
certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent uncommanded movement of the captain's and first
officer's seats during takeoff and landing, which could result in
interference with the operation of the airplane and consequent
temporary loss of control of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspection and Corrective Actions
(a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, perform
a detailed inspection of the captain's and first officer's seat
track locking pins for sufficient engagement, and any applicable
corrective actions by accomplishing all the actions in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
25A367, Revision 01, dated June 14, 2002. Do the actions per the
service bulletin. Any applicable corrective actions must be
accomplished before further flight.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
Inspection/Corrective Actions Accomplished per Previous Issue of
Service Bulletin
(b) Any inspection/corrective action accomplished before the
effective date of this AD per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
25A367, dated December 6, 1999, is considered acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding inspection/corrective action
specified in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, the actions shall be
done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-25A367,
Revision 01, dated June 14, 2002. This incorporation by reference
was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration
[[Page 41421]]
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on August 13, 2004.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24, 2004.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-15378 Filed 7-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.