AD 2003-14-20
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | AeroSpace | N22B N24A | Airworthiness Directives; AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd. Models N22B and N24A Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue loading on the upper control lever torque shaft due to nosewheel steering/rudder loads can cause cracks and discrepancies in the rudder control lever torque shafts, potentially leading to failure.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Repetitively inspect rudder control lever shafts using dye penetrant or magnetic particle methods and measurements for cracks. Inspect (one-time) all lever shaft side plates by measuring thickness. Replace unserviceable parts with new or serviceable parts if cracks or thickness discrepancies are found.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight for any necessary replacements identified during inspections.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd. Models N22B and N24A airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 82-12- 06, which applies to certain AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd. (ASTA) Models N22B and N24A airplanes. AD 82-12-06 currently requires repetitive visual inspections of all rudder control lever shaft assemblies for cracks and discrepancies, and, if cracks or discrepancies are found, it requires replacement with new or serviceable rudder control shafts, and a check of the fit of all rod end bearings in lever shafts. AD 82-12-06 also allows you to inspect all lever shafts by magnetic particle inspection or dye penetrant methods as terminating action for the repetitive visual inspections. This AD is the result of recent reports of failures of the upper control lever torque shaft due to fatigue loading on the affected airplanes, including those that included the terminating actions. This AD requires more detailed repetitive inspections (than there are in AD 82-12-06) of the upper and lower rudder pedal torque shafts and a one- time inspection for discrepancies in the thickness of the lever shaft side plates with appropriate follow-up action. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct cracks in the rudder control lever torque shafts and discrepancies in the thickness of the lever shaft side plates, which could result in failure of the rudder control lever torque shaft. Such failure could lead to reduced controllability of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 139 (Monday, July 21, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42954-42956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 03-17945]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-CE-04-AD; Amendment 39-13239; AD 2003-14-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty
Ltd. Models N22B and N24A Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 82-12-
06, which applies to certain AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty
Ltd. (ASTA) Models N22B and N24A airplanes. AD 82-12-06 currently
requires repetitive visual inspections of all rudder control lever
shaft assemblies for cracks and discrepancies, and, if cracks or
discrepancies are found, it requires replacement with new or
serviceable rudder control shafts, and a check of the fit of all rod
end bearings in lever shafts. AD 82-12-06 also allows you to inspect
all lever shafts by magnetic particle inspection or dye penetrant
methods as terminating action for the repetitive visual inspections.
This AD is the result of recent reports of failures of the upper
control lever torque shaft due to fatigue loading on the affected
airplanes, including those that included the terminating actions. This
AD requires more detailed repetitive inspections (than there are in AD
82-12-06) of the upper and lower rudder pedal torque shafts and a one-
time inspection for discrepancies in the thickness of the lever shaft
side plates with appropriate follow-up action. The actions specified by
this AD are intended to detect and correct cracks in the rudder control
lever torque shafts and discrepancies in the thickness of the lever
shaft side plates, which could result in failure of the rudder control
lever torque shaft. Such failure could lead to reduced controllability
of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on September 8, 2003.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of
September 8, 2003.
ADDRESSES: You may get the service information referenced in this AD
from Nomad Operations, Aerospace Support Division, Boeing Australia, PO
Box 767, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia; telephone 61 7 3306 3366;
facsimile 61 7 3306 3111. You may view this information at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003-CE-04-AD, 901 Locust, Room
506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Atmur, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5224; facsimile (562)
627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Has FAA taken any action to this point? Reports of cracking and
other discrepancies on rudder control lever shaft assemblies on certain
ASTA Models N22B and N24A airplanes caused us to issue AD 82-12-06,
Amendment 39-4399. AD 82-12-06 currently requires the following on
certain ASTA Models N22B and N24A airplanes:
--Repetitively inspecting visually all rudder control lever shafts for
cracking;
--If cracks are found, before further flight, replacing with new or
serviceable rudder control shafts;
--Checking for clearance of the fit of all rod end bearings in lever
shafts; and
--Discontinuing the repetitive visual inspections when lever shafts are
inspected either by magnetic particle inspection or dye penetrant
methods.
What has happened since AD 82-12-06 to initiate this proposed
action? The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is the
airworthiness authority for Australia, recently notified FAA of the
need to change AD 82-12-06. The CASA reports failures of the rudder
control lever shaft. All the failures have occurred during ground
operations and nosewheel steering/rudder loads are now considered the
primary cause of the failure.
Some of the failures occurred on airplanes where the terminating
action of AD 82-12-06 was incorporated.
What is the potential impact if FAA took no action? This condition,
if not detected and corrected, could result in failure of the rudder
control lever torque shaft. Such failure could lead to reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to
amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to certain ASTA Models N22B and N24A.
This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on April 29, 2003 (68 FR 22636). The NPRM
proposed to require you to repetitively inspect, using either dye
penetrant or magnetic particle methods and measurements, rudder control
lever shafts for cracks; inspect (one-time) all lever shaft side plates
by measuring the thickness; and if cracks or discrepancies in thickness
are found, replace unserviceable parts with new or serviceable parts.
Was the public invited to comment? The FAA encouraged interested
persons to participate in the making of this amendment. We did not
receive any comments on the proposed rule or on our determination of
the cost to the public.
FAA's Determination
What is FAA's final determination on this issue? After careful
review of all available information related to the subject presented
above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for minor editorial
corrections. We have determined that these minor corrections:
--Provide the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
--do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this AD? On July 10,
2002, FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July
22, 2002), which governs FAA's AD system. This regulation now includes
material that relates to special flight permits, alternative methods of
compliance, and altered products. This material previously was included
in each individual AD. Since this material is included in 14 CFR part
39, we will not include it in future AD actions.
[[Page 42955]]
Cost Impact
How many airplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD
affects 10 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on owners/operators of the
affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to accomplish the
initial inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost airplane Total cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 workhours x $60 per hour = $720 Not Applicable...... $720 10 x $720 = $7,200.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to accomplish any necessary
repetitive inspections:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 workhours x $60 per hour = $120. Not Applicable...... $120
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to accomplish any necessary lever
shaft replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspections. We have no way of determining the number of
airplanes that may need such replacement:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 workhours x $60 per hour = $720........... $930 $720 + $930 = $1,650.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to accomplish any necessary lever
shaft side plate replacements that would be required based on the
results of the proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the
number of airplanes that may need such replacement:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 workhours x $60 per hour = $720........... $930 $720 + $930 = $1,650.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Impact
Does this AD impact various entities? The regulations adopted
herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not
have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For
the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy
of the final evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 82-
12-06, Amendment 39-4399, and by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2003-14-20 Aerospace Technologies of Australia PTY LTD.: Amendment
39-13239; Docket No. 2003-CE-04-AD; Supersedes AD 82-12-06,
Amendment 39-4399.
(a) What airplanes are affected by this AD? This AD affects
Models N22B and N24A airplanes, all serial numbers, that are
certificated in any category.
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate
any of the airplanes identified in paragraph (a) of this AD must
comply with this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by
this AD are intended to detect and correct cracks in the rudder
control lever torque shafts and discrepancies in the thickness of
the lever shaft side plates, which could result in failure of the
rudder control lever torque shaft. Such failure could lead to
reduced controllability of the airplane.
(d) What actions must I accomplish to address this problem? To
address this problem, you must accomplish the following:
[[Page 42956]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the rudder control Within the next In accordance with
lever shafts, part numbers (P/ 100 hours time-in- Nomad Alert
N) 2/N-45-1102, 1/N-45-1103, service (TIS) Service Bulletin
and 1/N-45-1104 (or FAA- after September ANMD-27-51, dated
approved equivalent part 8, 2003 (the September 13,
numbers) for cracks. Use dye effective date of 2002, and the
penetrant while the shaft is this AD), unless applicable
installed; or either dye already maintenance
penetrant inspection or accomplished. manual.
magnetic particle methods if
the shaft is removed.
(2) Inspect all lever shaft side Within the next In accordance with
plates on P/Ns 2/N-45-1102, 1/N- 100 hours TIS Nomad Alert
45-1103, and 1/N-45-1104 (or after September Service Bulletin
FAA-approved equivalent part 8, 2003 (the ANMD-27-51, dated
numbers) by measuring the effective date of September 13,
thickness for discrepancies. this AD), unless 2002, and the
already applicable
accomplished. maintenance
manual.
(3) Visually inspect all rudder Repetitively In accordance with
control lever shafts P/Ns 2/N- inspect at Nomad Alert
45-1102, 1/N-45-1103, and 1/N- intervals not to Service Bulletin
45-1104 (or FAA-approved exceed 100 hours ANMD-27-51, dated
equivalent part numbers) for TIS after the September 13,
cracks. inspection 2002, and the
required in applicable
paragraph (d)(1) maintenance
of this AD. manual.
(4) If damage is found during Prior to further In accordance with
any inspection required by this flight after any Nomad Alert
AD. inspection Service Bulletin
required by this ANMD-27-51, dated
(i) For lever shafts found with AD. September 13,
crack damage, replace with new 2002, and the
or serviceable items. applicable
maintenance
manual.
(ii) For discrepancies in the
thickness of lever shaft side
plates, obtain a repair scheme
from the manufacturer through
FAA at the address specified in
paragraph (e) of this AD and
incorporate this repair scheme
(iii) Repairable and
nonrepairable damage is defined
in the service information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way?
(1) To use an alternative method of compliance or adjust the
compliance time, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.13. Send these
requests to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
For information on any already approved alternative methods of
compliance, contact Ron Atmur, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5224; facsimile (562) 627-
5210.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance approved in accordance
with AD 82-12-06, which is superseded by this AD, are not approved
as alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
(f) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accordance
with Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-51, dated September 13,
2002. The Director of the Federal Register approved this
incorporation by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
You may get copies from Nomad Operations, Aerospace Support
Division, Boeing Australia, PO Box 767, Brisbane, QLD 4000
Australia; telephone 61 7 3306 3366; facsimile 61 7 3306 3111. You
may view copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
(g) Does this AD action affect any existing AD actions? This
amendment supersedes AD 82-12-06, Amendment 39-4399.
Note: The subject of this AD is addressed in Australian AD GAF-
N22/44, dated November 14, 2002.
(h) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment
becomes effective on September 8, 2003.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 10, 2003.
Dorenda D. Baker,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 03-17945 Filed 7-18-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.