AD 2003-08-09
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Improper wire installations during manufacture and/or maintenance may lead to electrical arcing and/or heat-damaged wires, potentially causing fire and smoke in various areas of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect all electrical wiring installations in additional fuselage stations to detect discrepancies. Perform corrective actions if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes, as specified in the existing AD, with the addition of 41 inches of fuselage not previously inspected.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes, that currently requires a one-time detailed inspection to detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in various areas of the airplane; and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment requires another identical inspection in additional fuselage stations, and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report from the airplane manufacturer that it failed to include 41 inches of fuselage in the previously required inspection. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent electrical arcing and/or heat damaged wires due to improper wire installations during manufacture and/or maintenance of the airplane, and consequent fire and smoke in various areas of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 76 (Monday, April 21, 2003)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19334-19337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 03-9428]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NM-56-AD; Amendment 39-13120; AD 2003-08-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F
airplanes, that currently requires a one-time detailed inspection to
detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in various
areas of the airplane; and corrective actions, if necessary. This
amendment requires another identical inspection in additional fuselage
stations, and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is
prompted by a report from the airplane manufacturer that it failed to
include 41 inches of fuselage in the previously required inspection.
The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent electrical
arcing and/or heat damaged wires due to improper wire installations
during manufacture and/or maintenance of the airplane, and consequent
fire and smoke in various areas of the airplane.
DATES: Effective May 27, 2003.
The incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-
165, Revision 02, dated March 8, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form, as
listed in the regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of May 27, 2003.
The incorporation by reference of certain other publications, as
listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of
the Federal Register as of January 8, 2001 (65 FR 75620).
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may
be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Portwood, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5350; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 2000-24-15,
amendment 39-12022 (65 FR 75620, December 4, 2000), which is applicable
to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes, was
published in the Federal Register on August 29, 2002 (67 FR 55365). The
action proposed to continue to require a one-time detailed inspection
to detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in
various areas of the airplane; and corrective actions, if necessary.
The action also proposed to require another identical inspection in
additional fuselage stations, and corrective actions, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Two commenters request that the compliance time for the proposed
one-time detailed inspection to detect discrepancies of all electrical
wiring installations in the forward passenger compartment from stations
Y=1501.000 to Y=5-10.000 be extended from five years to six years. The
commenters state that this will allow the inspection to be accomplished
during a routine maintenance visit.
The FAA agrees. On May 19, 2000, we issued AD 2000-11-02, amendment
39-11750 (65 FR 34341, May 26, 2000), applicable to certain McDonnell
Douglas Model DC-10-10F, DC-10-15, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F, and DC-10-40
series airplanes, and Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes. That AD requires
a determination be made of whether, and at what locations, metallized
polyethyleneteraphthalate (MPET) insulation blankets are installed, and
replacement of MPET insulation blankets with new insulation blankets.
The compliance time is within five years after June 30, 2000.
Therefore, within approximately three years, the fire and smoke hazard
in various areas of those airplanes due to possible ignition of MPET
insulation blankets will be significantly reduced.
In light of this factor, we have determined that extending the
compliance time of the inspection required by paragraph (b) of this AD
by one year will not adversely affect safety, and will allow the
inspection to be performed at a base during regularly scheduled
maintenance where special equipment and trained maintenance personnel
will be available if necessary. Therefore, we have revised paragraph
(b) of the final rule to specify a compliance time of within six years
after the effective date of this AD.
Explanation of Editorial Change
We have changed the citation for Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-
165, Revision 02, dated March 8, 2001, throughout this final rule to
exclude the Evaluation Form. (The form is intended to be completed by
operators and submitted to the airplane manufacturer to provide input
on the quality of the service bulletin; however, this AD does not
include such a requirement.)
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously described.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 182 Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet. We estimate that 60 airplanes
of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
Each of the six inspections required by paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(6) of this AD, which are currently required by AD 2000-24-15,
require approximately 10 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an
average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of these currently required actions on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $216,000, or $3,600 per airplane.
[[Page 19335]]
The inspection required by paragraph (a)(7) of this AD, which is
currently required by AD 2000-24-15, takes approximately 5 work hours
per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this currently
required action on U.S. operators is estimated to be $18,000, or $300
per airplane.
The inspection required by paragraph (a)(8) of this AD, which is
currently required by AD 2000-24-15, takes approximately 12 work hours
per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this currently
required action on U.S. operators is estimated to be $43,200, or $720
per airplane.
The new inspection required by paragraph (b) of this AD will take
approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of this inspection of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to
be $3,600, or $60 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions. However, the FAA has been advised that
manufacturer warranty remedies are available for labor costs associated
with accomplishing the actions required by this proposed AD. Therefore,
the future economic cost impact of this rule on U.S. operators may be
less than the cost impact figure indicated above.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-12022 (65 FR
75620, December 4, 2000), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), amendment 39-13120, to read as follows:
2003-08-09 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-13120. Docket 2001-NM-56-
AD. Supersedes AD 2000-24-15, Amendment 39-12022.
Applicability: Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes, manufacturer's
fuselage numbers 0447 through 0449 inclusive, 0451 through 0464
inclusive, 0466 through 0489 inclusive, 0491 through 0517 inclusive,
0519 through 0552 inclusive, 0554 through 0556 inclusive, 0557, 0558
through 0633 inclusive, and 0635; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (f)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.
Note 2: The FAA recommends that the actions required by this AD
be accomplished immediately after accomplishing the replacement of
metallized polyethyleneteraphthalate (MPET) insulation blankets, as
required by AD 2000-11-02, amendment 39-11750 (65 FR 34341, May 26,
2000).
To prevent electrical arcing and/or heat damaged wires due to
improper wire installations during manufacture and/or maintenance of
the airplane, and consequent fire and smoke in various areas of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD 2000-24-15
One-Time Detailed Inspection
(a) Within 5 years after January 8, 2001 (the effective date of AD
2000-24-15, amendment 39-12022), accomplish the actions specified in
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), and
(a)(8) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For all airplanes: Perform a one-time detailed inspection to
detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in the
center and aft cargo compartments from stations Y=1521.000 to
Y=2007.000, in accordance with paragraph 3.B., ``Work Instructions,''
of the Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Service
Bulletin MD11-24-171, dated April 4, 2000; or Revision 01, dated
November 6, 2000.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(2) For all airplanes: Perform a one-time detailed inspection to
detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in the
forward cargo compartment from stations Y=595.000 to Y=6-73.500, in
accordance with paragraph 3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' of the
Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-
24-170, dated April 12, 2000; or Revision 01, dated November 6, 2000.
(3) For all airplanes: Perform a one-time detailed inspection to
detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in the
forward passenger compartment from stations Y=5-11.000 to Y=2007.000,
in accordance with paragraph 3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' of
[[Page 19336]]
the Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin
MD11-24-167, dated April 4, 2000; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-
167, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated November 6, 2000.
(4) For all airplanes: Perform a one-time detailed inspection to
detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in the
forward passenger compartment from stations Y=756.000 to Y=1501.000, in
accordance with paragraph 3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' of the
Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-
24-165, dated April 4, 2000; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-165,
Revision 01, including Appendix, dated November 6, 2000; or Revision
02, including Appendix, dated March 8, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form.
(5) For all airplanes: Perform a one-time detailed inspection to
detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in the
forward passenger compartment from stations Y=465.000 to Y=755.000, in
accordance with paragraph 3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' of the
Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-
24-163, dated April 4, 2000; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-163,
Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated November 6, 2000.
(6) For all airplanes: Perform a one-time detailed inspection to
detect discrepancies of all electrical wiring installations in the
flight compartment and forward drop ceilings areas from stations
Y=275.000 to Y=464.000, in accordance with paragraph 3.B., ``Work
Instructions,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell Douglas
Service Bulletin MD11-24-188, dated April 28, 2000; or Revision 01,
dated November 6, 2000.
(7) For airplanes having manufacturer's fuselage numbers 0447
through 0449 inclusive, 0451 through 0464 inclusive, 0466 through 0489
inclusive, 0491 through 0517 inclusive, 0519 through 0552 inclusive,
0554 through 0556 inclusive, 0557, and 0558 through 0633 inclusive:
Perform a one-time detailed inspection to detect discrepancies of all
electrical wiring installations in the center accessory compartment
from stations Y=6-50.000 to Y=1179.000, in accordance with paragraph
3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-161, dated April 10, 2000;
or Revision 01, dated November 6, 2000.
(8) For airplanes having manufacturer's fuselage numbers 0447
through 0449 inclusive, 0451 through 0464 inclusive, 0466 through 0489
inclusive, 0491 through 0517 inclusive, 0519 through 0552 inclusive,
0554 through 0556 inclusive, 0557, and 0558 through 0633 inclusive:
Perform a one-time detailed inspection to detect discrepancies of all
electrical wiring installations in the main avionics compartment from
stations Y=275.000 to Y=464.000, in accordance with paragraph 3.B.,
``Work Instructions,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-162, dated April 10, 2000; or Revision
01, dated November 6, 2000.
New Actions Required by This AD
One-Time Detailed Inspection
(b) For Group 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin
MD11-24-165, Revision 02, including Appendix, dated March 8, 2001,
excluding Evaluation Form: Within 6 years after the effective date of
this AD, perform a one-time detailed inspection to detect discrepancies
of all electrical wiring installations in the forward passenger
compartment from stations Y=1501.000 to Y=5-10.000, in accordance with
paragraph 3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' ``Group 2,'' of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-165,
Revision 02, dated March 8, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form.
Corrective Action
(c) If any discrepancy is detected during the inspection required
by paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(8) of this AD or paragraph (b) of this
AD, before further flight, accomplish the applicable corrective
action(s) in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
following applicable service bulletins, except as provided in
paragraphs (d) and (e) of this AD, as applicable:
(1) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-171, dated April 4,
2000; or Revision 01, dated November 6, 2000;
(2) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-170, dated April 12,
2000; or Revision 01, dated November 6, 2000;
(3) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-167, dated April 4,
2000;
(4) Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-167, dated April 4, 2000; or
Revision 01, including Appendix, dated November 6, 2000;
(5) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-165, dated April 4,
2000;
(6) Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-165, Revision 01, including
Appendix, dated November 6, 2000;
(7) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-163, dated April 4,
2000;
(8) Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-163, Revision 01, including
Appendix 1, dated November 6, 2000;
(9) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-188, dated April 28,
2000; or Revision 01, dated November 6, 2000;
(10) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-161, dated April
10, 2000; or Revision 01, dated November 6, 2000; or
(11) McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-24-162, dated April
10, 2000; or Revision 01, dated November 6, 2000;
(12) Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24-165, Revision 02, including
Appendix, dated March 8, 2001, excluding Evaluation Form.
Note 4: Where there are differences between the AD and the
referenced service bulletins, the AD prevails.
(d) If no gap between the wire bundle and blanket can be seen where
the wiring is routed over the structural frames when pressure is
applied to the blanket, before further flight, reposition wires or
clamps so that a gap can be seen when pressure is applied to the
blanket.
(e) If any screw terminal of the flag lug bus bar is loose, before
further flight, retorque to 10 to 11 inch-pounds.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(f)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used
if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments
and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in
accordance with AD 2000-24-15, amendment 39-12022, are approved as
alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
Special Flight Permits
(g) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(h) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, the actions shall be
done in
[[Page 19337]]
accordance with the applicable service bulletins listed in the
following table:
Table.--Applicable Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service bulletin Revision level Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24- Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
163, including Appendix.
Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24- Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
165, including Appendix 1.
Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24- Revision 02.......................... March 8, 2001.
165, including Appendix,
excluding Evaluation Form.
Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-24- Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
167, including Appendix.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 10, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-161.
McDonnell Douglas Service Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-161.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 10, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-162.
McDonnell Douglas Service Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-162.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 4, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-163.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 4, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-165.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 4, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-167.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 12, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-170.
McDonnell Douglas Service Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-170.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 4, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-171.
McDonnell Douglas Service Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-171.
McDonnell Douglas Service Original............................. April 28, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-188.
McDonnell Douglas Service Revision 01.......................... November 6, 2000.
Bulletin MD11-24-188.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-
24-165, Revision 02, including Appendix, dated March 8, 2001, excluding
Evaluation Form, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The incorporation by reference of the following service
bulletins labeled original, MD11-24-161, MD11-24-162, MD11-24-163,
MD11-24-165, MD11-24-167, MD11-24-170, MD11-24-171, and MD11-24-188;
and labeled Revision 1, MD11-24-163 including Appendix, MD11-24-165
including Appendix 1, MD11-24-167 including Appendix, MD11-24-162,
MD11-24-161, MD11-24-170, MD11-24-171, and MD11-24-188; as stated in
the table above; were approved previously by the Director of the
Federal Register as of January 8, 2001 (65 FR 75620, December 4, 2000).
(3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group,
Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California
90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-
0024). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(i) This amendment becomes effective on May 27, 2003.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 10, 2003.
Ali Bahrami,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 03-9428 Filed 4-18-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.