AD 2002-21-14
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 757-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 757-200CB Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 757-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate correctly, which could render the slide unusable during an emergency evacuation.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Determine the part numbers of the master control valve on the pressure bottles that activate the off-wing escape slides. Perform corrective action if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes. This AD requires determining the part numbers of the master control valve on the pressure bottles that activate the off-wing escape slides, and performing corrective action if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate correctly, which could cause the slide to be unusable during an emergency evacuation and result in consequent injury to passengers or crewmembers. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65493-65495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-27080]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-392-AD; Amendment 39-12921; AD 2002-21-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series
airplanes. This AD requires determining the part numbers of the master
control valve on the pressure bottles that activate the off-wing escape
slides, and performing corrective action if necessary. This action is
necessary to prevent failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate
correctly, which could cause the slide to be unusable during an
emergency evacuation and result in consequent injury to passengers or
crewmembers. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Effective November 29, 2002. The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of November 29, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical Information: Victor
Wicklund, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1426; fax (425) 227-1181.
Other Information: Judy Golder, Airworthiness Directive Technical
Editor/Writer; telephone (425) 687-4241, fax (425) 227-1232. Questions
or comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#056f70617c2b626a69616077456364642b626a73"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c06190815420b030008091e2c0a0d0d420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>. Questions or comments sent via the
Internet as attached electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft
Word 97 for Windows or ASCII text.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 757-200, -
200CB, and -300 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register
on February 26, 2002 (67 FR 8741). That action proposed to require
determining the part numbers of the master control valve on the
pressure bottles that activate the off-wing escape slides, and
corrective action, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Support for the Proposal
Two commenters concur with the proposed AD. One additional
[[Page 65494]]
commenter states that it does not operate any affected airplanes.
Revise Applicability Statement
One commenter requests that the FAA revise the applicability
statement to specify ``Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series
airplanes, line numbers 1 through 905, equipped with an off-wing escape
slide system, . . . .'' The applicability statement of the proposed AD
specifies ``Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes, as listed
in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-25-0214 or 757-25-
0216, both dated April 6, 2000, . . . .'' The commenter states that
revising the applicability statement would make it easier to identify
affected airplanes without referring to the service information.
The FAA concurs and has revised the applicability statement of this
final rule accordingly.
Identify Manufacturers
One commenter requests that we revise paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2),
and (b) of the proposed AD to identify the manufacturers associated
with each of the part numbers listed in those paragraphs. The commenter
states that this change would eliminate any confusion about the correct
part number of the airplane manufacturer or vendor.
We concur and have revised paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (b) of
this final rule accordingly.
Include Instructions to Deactivate Cargo Loading System
One commenter requests that Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757-25-0216, dated April 6, 2000, include instructions to
deactivate the aft cargo loading system on Boeing Model 757-300 series
airplanes, if such a system is installed, before doing the proposed
inspections and corrective actions.
Though the commenter provides no justification for the change, we
infer that the commenter makes this recommendation in the interest of
the safety of maintenance personnel. While this AD is not intended to
address safety concerns related to cargo loading systems, we find that
the commenter's recommendation represents a sound precaution that
operators may want to consider when accomplishing the actions required
by this AD. Therefore, we have added Note 2 to this final rule (and
renumbered a subsequent note accordingly) to state that operators may
want to deactivate any installed cargo handling system before
undertaking the actions required by paragraph (a) of this AD.
Extend Compliance Time
One commenter, the airplane manufacturer, requests that we extend
the proposed compliance time from 18 months to 36 months. The commenter
states that a 36-month compliance time would allow operators to
accomplish the necessary actions at a regularly scheduled maintenance
interval. The commenter justifies its request by stating that, in the
unlikely event an off-wing escape slide fails to automatically inflate,
the escape slide can still be inflated using the manual inflation
handle. Thus, the escape slide would still be available if needed for
an emergency evacuation. The FAA acknowledges that the manual inflation
handle provides a reduction of risk. Therefore, we concur that the
compliance time for paragraph (a) of this AD may be extended to 36
months and yet still maintain an adequate level of safety in the fleet.
We have revised paragraph (a) of this final rule accordingly.
Revise Cost Impact Estimate
One commenter disagrees with our estimate of the cost impact of the
proposed AD. The commenter notes that the estimate only considers
direct labor costs for removal and reinstallation of the valves and
does not assess the costs that operators may incur for replacement or
modification of the valves. The commenter states that, while the parts
manufacturer has been exchanging the subject valves at no cost to
operators, once the exchange program ends, operators will be charged
for valve modification or exchange.
We infer that the commenter is requesting that we revise the cost
estimate in this final rule to include an estimate of the cost of
required parts if the parts are not covered by the parts manufacturer's
exchange program. We concur. If an operator must purchase a replacement
valve, we estimate that it will cost $15,000. We have revised the Cost
Impact section of this final rule accordingly. We also have included a
statement that the ``parts manufacturer may cover the cost of
replacement parts associated with this AD, subject to the conditions of
its exchange program,'' and, thus, the costs attributable to this AD
may be less than stated.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously described.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 435 Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series
airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. We estimate
that 360 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that
it will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the
required inspection, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection
required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $21,600, or
$60 per airplane.
Should an operator be required to accomplish the replacement of the
valve and placard, it will take approximately 2 work hours per airplane
to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required
parts will cost approximately $15,000. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the replacement is estimated to be $15,120 per airplane. The
parts manufacturer may cover the cost of replacement parts associated
with this AD, subject to the conditions of its exchange program. As a
result, the costs attributable to this AD may be less than stated
above.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)
[[Page 65495]]
will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for
this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may
be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2002-21-14 Boeing: Amendment 39-12921. Docket 2000-NM-392-AD.
Applicability: Model 757-200, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes;
line numbers 001 through 905 inclusive; equipped with an off-wing
escape slide system; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate
correctly, which could cause the slide to be unusable during an
emergency evacuation and result in consequent injury to passengers
or crewmembers, accomplish the following:
Inspection/Corrective Action
(a) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD:
Determine the part numbers (P/N) of the master control valve
installed on each of the two pressure bottles located in the forward
end of the aft cargo compartment that activate the off-wing escape
slides, per Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-25-0214
(for Model 757-200 and 200CB series airplanes), or 757-25-0216 (for
Model 757-300 series airplanes), both dated April 6, 2000, as
applicable.
Note 2: To reduce the risk of accidental injury to maintenance
personnel, operators may want to deactivate any installed cargo
handling system before undertaking the actions required by paragraph
(a) of this AD.
(1) If any P/N found on any valve is Boeing P/N S416N207-6
(Pacific Scientific P/N 42000802-1), before further flight, replace
the affected valve with a new valve or rework the valve, as
applicable; and replace the placard on the corresponding pressure
bottle assembly with a new placard, per the applicable service
bulletin.
(2) If the P/N shown on both valves is not Boeing P/N S416N207-6
(Pacific Scientific P/N 42000802-1), no further action is required
by this paragraph.
Spares
(b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
a master control valve, Boeing P/N S416N207-6 (Pacific Scientific P/
N 42000802-1), on any airplane.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO). Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757-25-0214, dated April 6, 2000; or
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-25-0216, dated April
6, 2000; as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on November 29, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 16, 2002.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-27080 Filed 10-24-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.