AD 2002-19-01
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Socata | Various | Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA-Groupe AEROSPATIALE Model TBM 700 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Jamming of the flight control wheels during operation could result in the control wheel traveling beyond normal roll control limits, potentially leading to reduced or loss of control of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a test on the flight control system. Adjust the control roll stop if jamming occurs during the test.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
All SOCATA-Groupe AEROSPATIALE Model TBM 700 airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all SOCATA--Groupe AEROSPATIALE (Socata) Model TBM 700 airplanes. This AD requires you to perform a test on the flight control system and adjust the control roll stop if jamming occurs during the test. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for France. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the flight control wheels from traveling beyond normal roll control limits, which could result in the control wheel becoming jammed. Such a condition could lead to reduced or loss of control of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59137-59139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-23513]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002-CE-15-AD; Amendment 39-12881; AD 2002-19-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA--Groupe AEROSPATIALE Model TBM
700 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to all SOCATA--Groupe AEROSPATIALE (Socata) Model TBM 700
airplanes. This AD requires you to perform a test on the flight control
system and adjust the control roll stop if jamming occurs during the
test. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for France.
The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the flight
control wheels from traveling beyond normal roll control limits, which
could result in the control wheel becoming jammed. Such a condition
could lead to reduced or loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on October 29, 2002.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of
October 29, 2002.
ADDRESSES: You may get the service information referenced in this AD
from SOCATA Groupe AEROSPATIALE, Customer Support, Aerodrome Tarbes-
Ossun-Lourdes, BP 930--F65009 Tarbes Cedex, France; telephone: 011 33 5
62 41 73 00; facsimile: 011 33 5 62 41 76 54; or the Product Support
Manager, SOCATA--Groupe AEROSPATIALE, North Perry Airport, 7501
Pembroke Road, Pembroke Pines, Florida 33023; telephone: (954) 893-
1400; facsimile: (954) 964-4141. You may view this information at the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2002-CE-15-AD, 901
Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106;
[[Page 59138]]
telephone: (816) 329-4146; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What Events Have Caused This AD?
The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France, recently notified FAA that an
unsafe condition may exist on all Socata Model TBM 700 airplanes. The
DGAC reports that, during a ground test of the flight control system on
one of the affected airplanes, the pilot control wheel became jammed
when performing dual actions (e.g., full up and full left) because the
control wheel was turned beyond normal roll control travel limits. This
was a result of a misadjustment of the roll control.
What Is the Potential Impact if FAA Took No Action?
If this condition is not corrected, it could result in the flight
control wheels traveling beyond normal roll control limits, which could
result in the control wheel becoming jammed. This could lead to reduced
or loss of control of the airplane.
Has FAA Taken Any Action to This Point?
We issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to all
Socata Model TBM 700 airplanes. This proposal was published in the
Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on July 12,
2002 (67 FR 46130). The NPRM proposed to require you to inspect the
flight control system to determine if jamming occurs and adjust the
roll control stop to correct this condition.
What Are the Differences Between This AD, the Service Information, and
the DGAC AD?
The DGAC AD requires inspection and, if necessary, adjustment prior
to further flight after the effective date of the AD. We require that
you inspect and, if necessary, adjust within 100 hours time-in-service
(TIS) after the effective date of this AD.
We do not have justification to require this action prior to
further flight. We use compliance times such as this when we have
identified an urgent safety of flight situation. We believe that 100
hours TIS will give the owners or operators of the affected airplanes
enough time to have the actions required by this AD accomplished
without compromising the safety of the airplanes.
Was the Public Invited To Comment?
The FAA encouraged interested persons to participate in the making
of this amendment. We did not receive any comments on the proposed rule
or on our determination of the cost to the public.
FAA's Determination
What Is FAA's Final Determination on This Issue?
After careful review of all available information related to the
subject presented above, we have determined that air safety and the
public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these minor
corrections:
--Provide the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
--Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Cost Impact
How Many Airplanes Does This AD Impact?
We estimate that this AD affects 133 airplanes in the U.S.
registry.
What Is the Cost Impact of This AD on Owners/Operators of the Affected
Airplanes?
We estimate the following costs to accomplish the inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost airplane Total cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 workhour x $60 per hour = $60...... None.................... $60 $60 x 133 = $7,980.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to accomplish any necessary
modification that will be required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes that
may need such modification:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 workhours x $60 per hour = $180 None................ $180.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Impact
Does This AD Impact Various Entities?
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does This AD Involve a Significant Rule or Regulatory Action?
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
[[Page 59139]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2002-19-01 SOCATA--Groupe AEROSPATIALE: Amendment 39-12881; Docket
No. 2002-CE-15-AD.
(a) What airplanes are affected by this AD? This AD affects
Model TBM 700 airplanes, all serial numbers, that are certificated
in any category.
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate
any of the airplanes identified in paragraph (a) of this AD must
comply with this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by
this AD are intended to prevent the flight control wheels from
traveling beyond normal roll control limits, which could result in
the control wheel becoming jammed. Such a condition could lead to
reduced or loss of control of the airplane.
(d) What actions must I accomplish to address this problem? To
address this problem, you must accomplish the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Perform a test of the Within the next 100 In accordance with
pilot and right-hand (RH) hours time-in- Socata TBM Aircraft
station control wheels to service after Mandatory Service
determine if either control October 29, 2002 Bulletin SB 70-095
wheel becomes jammed. (the effective date 27, November 2001.
of this AD) and
thereafter every
time the flight
control system
undergoes
maintenance.
-----------------------------
(2) Adjust the roll control Prior to further In accordance with
stops if jamming occurs on flight after Socata TBM Aircraft
either the pilot control jamming is found Mandatory Service
wheel or the RH station during any test Bulletin SB 70-095
control wheel during any required by 27, dated November
test required in paragraph paragraph (d)(1) of 2001.
(d)(1) of this AD. this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way? You may use an
alternative method of compliance or adjust the compliance time if:
(1) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent
level of safety; and
(2) The Standards Office Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
approves your alternative. Submit your request through an FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Standards Office Manager.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in paragraph
(a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered,
or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For
airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the
performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request
should include an assessment of the effect of the modification,
alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD;
and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe condition, specific
actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already-approved
alternative methods of compliance? Contact Karl Schletzbaum,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146;
facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
(g) What if I need to fly the airplane to another location to
comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your airplane to a location where
you can accomplish the requirements of this AD. No passengers are
allowed for this flight.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accordance
with Socata TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-095 27,
dated November 2001. The Director of the Federal Register approved
this incorporation by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. You may get copies from SOCATA Groupe AEROSPATIALE, Customer
Support, Aerodrome Tarbes-Ossun-Lourdes, BP 930--F65009 Tarbes
Cedex, France; telephone: 011 33 5 62 41 73 00; facsimile: 011 33 5
62 41 76 54; or the Product Support Manager, SOCATA Groupe
AEROSPATIALE, North Perry Airport, 7501 Pembroke Road, Pembroke
Pines, Florida 33023; telephone: (954) 893-1400; facsimile: (954)
964-4141. You may view copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri,
or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street,
NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in French AD 2001-
582(A), dated November 28, 2001.
(i) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment
becomes effective on October 29, 2002.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 6, 2002.
Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 02-23513 Filed 9-19-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.