AD 2002-15-01
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Diamond | Various | Airworthiness Directives; Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Models H-36 “Dimona”, HK 36 R “Super Dimona”, HK 36 TC, HK 36 TS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36 TTC-ECO, HK 36 TTC-ECO (Restricted Category), and HK 36 TTS Sailplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Damage in the long aileron push control rods could result in failure of the aileron push rods and decreased control, potentially leading to aeroelastic flutter.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the long aileron push rods in both wings for damage and modify the push rods as specified.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Models H-36 "Dimona", HK 36 R "Super Dimona", HK 36 TC, HK 36 TS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36 TTC-ECO, HK 36 TTC-ECO (Restricted Category), and HK 36 TTS sailplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH (Diamond) Models H-36 "Dimona", HK 36 R "Super Dimona", HK 36 TC, HK 36 TS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36 TTC-ECO, HK 36 TTC-ECO (Restricted Category), and HK 36 TTS sailplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the long aileron push rods in both wings for damage and modify the push rods. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Austria. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct damage in the long aileron push control rods, which could result in failure of the aileron push rods and decreased control. Such failure could lead to aeroelastic flutter.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 140 (Monday, July 22, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47680-47682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-18333]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002-CE-11-AD; Amendment 39-12829; AD 2002-15-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Models
H-36 ``Dimona'', HK 36 R ``Super Dimona'', HK 36 TC, HK 36 TS, HK 36
TTC, HK 36 TTC-ECO, HK 36 TTC-ECO (Restricted Category), and HK 36 TTS
Sailplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to all Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH (Diamond) Models H-36
``Dimona'', HK 36 R ``Super Dimona'', HK 36 TC, HK 36 TS, HK 36 TTC, HK
36 TTC-ECO, HK 36 TTC-ECO (Restricted Category), and HK 36 TTS
sailplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the long aileron push rods
in both wings for damage and modify the push rods. This AD is the
result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued
by the airworthiness authority for Austria. The actions specified by
this AD are intended to detect and correct damage in the long aileron
push control rods, which could result in failure of the aileron push
rods and decreased control. Such failure could lead to aeroelastic
flutter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on September 3, 2002.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of
September 3, 2002.
ADDRESSES: You may get the service information referenced in this AD
from Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Strasse 5, A-2700
Wiener Neistadt, Austria; telephone: 43 2622 26 700; facsimile: 43 2622
26 780. You may view this information at the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2002-CE-11-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106;
[[Page 47681]]
telephone: (816) 329-4144; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What Events Have Caused This AD?
The Austro Control GmbH (Austro Control), which is the
airworthiness authority for Austria, recently notified FAA that an
unsafe condition may exist on all Diamond Models H-36 ``Dimona'', HK 36
R ``Super Dimona'', HK 36 TC, HK 36 TS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36 TTC-ECO, HK 36
TTC-ECO (Restricted Category), and HK 36 TTS sailplanes. The Austro
Control reports that during the preflight of one sailplane, the long
aileron push rod was found to be broken. On several sailplanes, the
aileron push control rods in both wings were found damaged due to
contact or interference with the support for the aileron bellcrank.
What Is the Potential Impact If FAA Took No Action?
If the damaged aileron push control rods are not detected and
corrected, the damage could result in failure of the aileron push rods
and decreased control. Such failure could lead to aeroelastic flutter.
Has FAA Taken Any Action to This Point?
We issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to all
Diamond Models H-36 ``Dimona'', HK 36 R ``Super Dimona'', HK 36 TC, HK
36 TS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36 TTC-ECO, HK 36 TTC-ECO (Restricted Category),
and HK 36 TTS sailplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal
Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on May 20, 2002 (67
FR 35459). The NPRM proposed to require you to inspect the long aileron
push rods in both wings for damage and modify the push rods.
Was the Public Invited To Comment?
The FAA encouraged interested persons to participate in the making
of this amendment. We did not receive any comments on the proposed rule
or on our determination of the cost to the public.
FAA's Determination
What Is FAA's Final Determination on This Issue?
After careful review of all available information related to the
subject presented above, we have determined that air safety and the
public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these minor
corrections:
--Provide the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
--Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Cost Impact
How Many Sailplanes Does This AD Impact?
We estimate that this AD affects 45 sailplanes in the U.S.
registry.
What Is the Cost Impact of This AD on Owners/Operators of the Affected
Sailplanes?
We estimate the following costs to accomplish the inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost sailplane Total cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 workhour x $60 per hour = $60..... None................... $60 $60 x 45 = $2,700
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to accomplish the modification:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost sailplane Total cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 workhours x $60 per hour = $120... $80.................... $200 $200 x 45 = $9,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance Time of This AD
Why Is a Compliance Time of 10 Hours Time-in-Service (TIS) Used for the
Inspection of the Long Aileron Push Rods?
Normally, FAA uses a 10-hour TIS compliance time for urgent safety
of flight conditions. However, sailplane operation varies among
operators. It might take operators between 3 months to 12 months or
more to accumulate 10 hours TIS. For this reason, FAA has determined
that the compliance time of this AD should be 10 hours TIS to ensure
this condition is corrected in a timely manner but does not unduly
penalize operators.
Regulatory Impact
Does This AD Impact Various Entities?
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does This AD Involve a Significant Rule or Regulatory Action?
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
[[Page 47682]]
2002-15-01 Diamond Aircraft Industries GMBH: Amendment 39-12829;
Docket No. 2002-CE-11-AD.
(a) What sailplanes are affected by this AD? This AD affects
Models H-36 ``Dimona'', HK 36 R ``Super Dimona'', HK 36 TC, HK 36
TS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36 TTC-ECO, HK 36 TTC-ECO (Restricted Category),
and HK 36 TTS sailplanes, all serial numbers, that are certificated
in any category.
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate
any of the sailplanes identified in paragraph (a) of this AD must
comply with this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by
this AD are intended to detect and correct damage in the long
aileron push control rods, which could result in failure of the
aileron push rods and decreased control. Such failure could lead to
aeroelastic flutter.
(d) What actions must I accomplish to address this problem? To
address this problem, you must accomplish the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the long aileron Within the next 10 In accordance with
push rods in both wings. hours time-in- paragraph 1.8
service (TIS) after Measures of Diamond
September 3, 2002 Aircraft Industries
(the effective date GmbH Service
of this AD). Bulletin No. MSB36-
72, dated February
1, 2002; Diamond
Aircraft Industries
GmbH Work
Instruction No. WI-
MSB36-72, dated
February 1, 2002;
and the applicable
sailplane
maintenance manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) If any long aileron push Before further In accordance with
rods are found damaged flight, after the paragraph 1.8
during the inspection inspection required Measures of Diamond
required in paragraph in paragraph (d)(1) Aircraft Industries
(d)(1) of this AD, modify of this AD. GmbH Service
the push rods. Bulletin No. MSB36-
72, dated February
1, 2002; Diamond
Aircraft Industries
GmbH Work
Instruction No. WI-
MSB36-72, dated
February 1, 2002;
and the applicable
sailplane
maintenance manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) If no damage is found Within the next 25 In accordance with
during the inspection hours TIS after paragraph 1.8
required in paragraph September 3, 2002 Measures of Diamond
(d)(1), modify the push (the effective date Aircraft Industries
rods. of this AD). GmbH Service
Bulletin No. MSB36-
72, dated February
1, 2002; Diamond
Aircraft Industries
GmbH Work
Instruction No. WI-
MSB36-72, dated
February 1, 2002;
and the applicable
sailplane
maintenance manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way? You may use an
alternative method of compliance or adjust the compliance time if:
(1) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent
level of safety; and
(2) The Standards Office Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
approves your alternative. Submit your request through an FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Standards Office Manager.
Note 1: This AD applies to each sailplane identified in
paragraph (a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For sailplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe
condition, specific actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already-approved
alternative methods of compliance? Contact Mike Kiesov, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4144; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
(g) What if I need to fly the sailplane to another location to
comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your sailplane to a location where
you can accomplish the requirements of this AD.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accordance
with Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Service Bulletin No. MSB36-72,
dated February 1, 2002; and Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instruction No. WI-MSB36-72, dated February 1, 2002. The Director of
the Federal Register approved this incorporation by reference under
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may get copies from Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Strasse 5, A-2700 Wiener
Neistadt, Austria; telephone: 43 2622 26 700; facsimile: 43 2622 26
780. You may view copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the
Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri, or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in Austrian AD No.
111, dated February 26, 2002.
(i) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment
becomes effective on September 3, 2002.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 12, 2002.
Dorenda D. Baker,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-18333 Filed 7-19-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.