AD 2002-14-13
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of the wire assemblies and damage of a ballast of a light fixture, which could result in smoke and/or fire in the forward cargo compartment.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Install a clipnut and bracket, and revise the routing of the wire assembly of the forward lower cargo door.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes, that requires installing a clipnut and bracket and revising the routing of the wire assembly of the forward lower cargo door. This action is necessary to prevent failure of the wire assemblies and damage of a ballast of a light fixture, and consequent smoke and/or fire in the forward cargo compartment. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47654-47656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-17532]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NM-158-AD; Amendment 39-12813; AD 2002-14-13]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes,
that requires installing a clipnut and bracket and revising the routing
of the wire assembly of the forward lower cargo door. This action is
necessary to prevent failure of the wire assemblies and damage of a
ballast of a
[[Page 47655]]
light fixture, and consequent smoke and/or fire in the forward cargo
compartment. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Effective August 23, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 23, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may
be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical Information: Brett Portwood,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5350; fax (562)
627-5210.
Other Information: Sandi Carli, Airworthiness Directive Technical
Writer/Editor; telephone (425) 687-4243, fax (425) 227-1232. Questions
or comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bac9dbd4ded394d9dbc8d6d3fadcdbdb94ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9cad8d7ddd097dad8cbd5d0f9dfd8d897ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>. Questions or comments sent via the
Internet as attached electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft
Word 97 for Windows or ASCII text.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
MD-11 and -11F airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
October 5, 2001 (66 FR 50873). That action proposed to require
installing a clipnut and bracket and revising the routing of the wire
assembly of the forward lower cargo door.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Request To Revise the Cost Impact
One commenter, the airplane manufacturer, notes that the Cost
Impact section of the proposed AD states, ``The manufacturer has
committed previously to its customers that it will bear the cost of
replacement parts.'' The commenter states that this is not quite
accurate. The commenter notes that in ``2.B. Industry Support
Information'' of the referenced service bulletin (i.e., Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11-52A035, Revision 02, dated March 12, 2001), it
states, ``Boeing warranty remedies are available for airplanes in
warranty as of February 5, 1997.''
The FAA infers that the commenter is requesting that the Cost
Impact section be revised to correctly address warranty remedies. We
concur. We have revised the final rule to specify the cost of the
required parts and to clarify that required parts will be provided at
no charge for affected airplanes within the warranty period.
Request To Revise Incorrect Service Bulletin Reference
One commenter requests that a typographical error be corrected in
Note 2 of the proposed AD. The commenter states the correct service
bulletin reference should be ``MD11-52-035,'' not ``MD11-52-034.'' The
FAA concurs and has revised the final rule accordingly.
Explanation of Change to Applicability
The FAA finds that Model MD-11F airplanes were not specifically
identified by model name in the applicability of the proposed AD.
However, those airplanes are identified by manufacturer's fuselage
numbers in the effectivity listing of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
MD11-52A035, Revision 02, dated March 12, 2001, which was referenced in
the applicability of the proposed AD. Therefore, we have revised this
AD to specifically reference Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes where
appropriate. In addition, the FAA has revised the applicability of the
existing AD to identify model designations as published in the most
recent type certificate data sheet for the affected models.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously
described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 157 Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 61
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will
take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required
actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. The cost
of required parts will be nominal. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,320, or $120
per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions. However, for affected airplanes within the
period under the warranty agreement, the FAA has been advised that the
manufacturer has committed previously to its customers that it will
bear the cost of replacement parts.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
[[Page 47656]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2002-14-13 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12813. Docket 2001-NM-
158-AD.
Applicability: Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes, as listed in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-52A035, Revision 02, dated March
12, 2001; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of the wire assemblies and damage of a
ballast of a light fixture, and consequent smoke and/or fire in the
forward cargo compartment, accomplish the following:
Installation of Clipnut and Bracket and Revision of Routing of Wiring
(a) Within 1 year after the effective date of this AD, install a
clipnut and bracket and revise the routing of the wire assembly of
the forward lower cargo door, per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
MD11-52A035, Revision 02, dated March 12, 2001.
Note 2: Accomplishment of the actions specified in McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-52-035, Revision 01, dated March 9,
1998, before the effective date of this AD, is considered acceptable
for compliance with the requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11-52A035, Revision 02, dated March 12, 2001.
This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group,
Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California
90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-
0024). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on August 23, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2, 2002.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-17532 Filed 7-18-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.