AD 2002-09-06
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-81 (MD-81) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-82 (MD-82) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-83 (MD-83) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-88 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Improper installation of the support clamp of the AC power relay feeder cables at the aft inboard side of the electrical power center could result in chafing, leading to electrical arcing and damage to adjacent structures, and consequent smoke and/or fire in the electrical power center area.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the installation of the support clamp of the AC power relay feeder cables at the aft inboard side of the electrical power center. Take corrective actions if the installation is not proper.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 airplanes. This AD requires an inspection to verify proper installation of the support clamp of the alternating current (AC) power relay feeder cables at the aft inboard side of the electrical power center, and corrective actions, if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent the AC power relay feeder cables from chafing against the aft inboard side of the electrical power center due to improper installation, which could result in electrical arcing and damage to adjacent structures, and consequent smoke and/or fire in the electrical power center area. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 85 (Thursday, May 2, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21985-21987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-10652]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-165-AD; Amendment 39-12739; AD 2002-09-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-
81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82
(MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 airplanes. This AD requires an
inspection to verify proper installation of the support clamp of the
alternating current (AC) power relay feeder cables at the aft inboard
side of the electrical power center, and corrective actions, if
necessary. This action is necessary to prevent the AC power relay
feeder cables from chafing against the aft inboard side of the
electrical power center due to improper installation, which could
result in electrical arcing and damage to adjacent structures, and
consequent smoke and/or fire in the electrical power center area. This
action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 6, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may
be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elvin Wheeler, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5344; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
DC-9-81, -82, and -83 series airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes, was
published in the Federal Register on January 9, 2002 (67 FR 1165). That
action proposed to require an inspection to verify proper installation
of the support clamp of the alternating current (AC) power relay feeder
cables at the aft inboard side of the electrical power center, and
corrective actions, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Explanation of Change to Applicability of Proposed Rule
The FAA has revised the applicability of this final rule to
identify model designations as published in the most recent type
certificate data sheet for the affected models.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, the FAA has determined
that air
[[Page 21986]]
safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with
the change previously described. The FAA has determined that this
change will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 162 Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82),
DC-9-83 (MD-83), and MD-88 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 90 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work
hour per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $5,400, or $60 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2002-09-06 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12739. Docket 2000-NM-
165-AD.
Applicability: Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83
(MD-83), and MD-88 airplanes; certificated in any category; as
listed in McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-24A145,
Revision 01, dated June 22, 2000.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent the alternating current (AC) power relay feeder cable
from chafing against the aft inboard side of the electrical power
center, which could result in electrical arcing and damage to
adjacent structures, and consequent smoke and/or fire in the
electrical power center area, accomplish the following:
Inspection
(a) Within 1 year from the effective date of this AD, do a
general visual inspection to verify proper installation of the
support clamp of the alternating current (AC) power relay feeder
cables (includes the clamp, grommet, and sta-strap) at the aft
inboard side of the electrical power center, per McDonnell Douglas
Alert Service Bulletin MD80-24A145, Revision 01, dated June 22,
2000.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
Proper Installation: No Further Action
(1) If the installation of the clamp, grommet, and sta-strap is
correct, no further action is required by this AD.
Improper Installation: Corrective Actions
(2) If any installation of the clamp, grommet, or sta-strap is
not correct, before further flight, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Do a general visual inspection of the power relay feeder
cables for chafing, per the service bulletin. If any chafing is
found, before further flight, repair per the service bulletin.
(ii) Install the clamp, grommet, and sta-strap, per the service
bulletin.
Note 3: Accomplishment of the actions specified in McDonnell
Douglas MD80-24-145, dated December 15, 1992, before the effective
date of this AD, is considered acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Incorporation by Reference
(c) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Alert Service Bulletin MD80-24A145, Revision 01, dated June
22, 2000. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial
Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long
Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management,
Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
[[Page 21987]]
Effective Date
(d) This amendment becomes effective on June 6, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 24, 2002.
Lirio Liu-Nelson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-10652 Filed 5-1-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.