AD 2002-05-07
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | 737-100 | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Discrepancies of the rear spar attachments and cracks in the upper flange of the inboard track at the rear spar attachment of each outboard flap could result in loss of the outboard trailing edge flaps and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
For certain airplanes, repetitive inspections for discrepancies of the rear spar attachments and cracks in the upper flange of the inboard track are required, followed by rework of the flap track assembly and rear spar attachments, including replacement of the flap track if necessary. For all airplanes, repetitive inspections for cracks in the upper flange of the inboard flap tracks at the rear spar attachments are required, with corrective action taken if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Not specified in the provided text.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. For certain airplanes, this action requires repetitive inspections for discrepancies of the rear spar attachments and cracks in the upper flange of the inboard track at the rear spar attachment of each outboard flap, and eventual rework of the flap track assembly and rear spar attachments, including replacement of the flap track with a new track, if necessary. For all airplanes, this action requires repetitive inspections for cracks in the upper flange of the inboard flap tracks at the rear spar attachments, and corrective action, if necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to find and fix discrepancies of the inboard tracks of the outboard flaps, which could result in loss of the outboard trailing edge flaps and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane. These actions are intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 52 (Monday, March 18, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11891-11893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-6201]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-21-AD; Amendment 39-12675; AD 2002-05-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400,
and -500 series airplanes. For certain airplanes, this action requires
repetitive inspections for discrepancies of the rear spar attachments
and cracks in the upper flange of the inboard track at the rear spar
attachment of each outboard flap, and eventual rework of the flap track
assembly and rear spar attachments, including replacement of the flap
track with a new track, if necessary. For all airplanes, this action
requires repetitive inspections for cracks in the upper flange of the
inboard flap tracks at the rear spar attachments, and corrective
action, if necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to
find and fix discrepancies of the inboard tracks of the outboard flaps,
which could result in loss of the outboard trailing edge flaps and
consequent reduced controllability of the airplane. These actions are
intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective April 22, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of April 22, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Blilie, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2131; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C,
-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes was published as a supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on August
2, 2001 (66 FR 40162). That action proposed to expand the applicability
and remove the optional terminating action of the proposed AD. For
certain airplanes, that action proposed to require new repetitive
inspections for discrepancies of the rear spar attachments and cracks
in the upper flange of the inboard track at the rear spar attachment of
each outboard flap, and eventual rework of the flap track assembly and
rear spar attachments, including replacement of the flap track with a
new track, if necessary. For all airplanes, that action proposed to
require repetitive inspections for cracks in the upper flange of the
inboard flap tracks at the rear spar attachments, and corrective
action, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Request to Clarify Compliance Time
Several commenters note that in paragraphs (a) and (c)(1) of the
Supplemental NPRM, the phrase ``whichever occurs later,'' is used when
only one compliance time is given. They ask that the compliance time be
clarified.
The FAA concurs that clarification is required and, accordingly,
has deleted the phrase ``whichever occurs later'' from paragraphs (a)
and (c)(1) of this final rule.
Request to Clarify Which Airplanes Are Subject to Paragraph (a) of
the Supplemental NPRM
One commenter points out that paragraph (a) of the Supplemental
NPRM is applicable to all Model 737 series airplanes with line numbers
1 through 1585, whereas the service bulletin cited is effective only
for the Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes. The commenter
requests clarification as to the applicability of paragraph (a) of the
AD.
The FAA concurs that clarification is necessary. Our intent was to
have paragraph (a) of this AD apply only to the Model 737-100, -200,
and -200C series airplanes. Accordingly, we have inserted the phrase
``[for] Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series [airplanes]'' in
paragraph (a) of this final rule to specify the correct applicability.
Another commenter suggests that the part of paragraph (a) of the
Supplemental NPRM which reads ``* * * and airplanes with [line numbers]
L/N 870 through 1585 on which the original flap tracks have been
replaced with certain tracks as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
737-57A1249, Revision 1 * * *'' could be interpreted in two different
ways. The commenter requests clarification.
The FAA agrees that the sentence could be misunderstood and,
accordingly, has revised the language in paragraph (a) of this final
rule to read
[[Page 11892]]
``* * * and those airplanes with L/Ns 870 through 1585 inclusive, which
either still have their original flap tracks or which have had the
original flap tracks replaced with certain tracks as specified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1249, Revision 1 * * *''
Request to Clarify Which Flap Tracks Are Affected
One commenter states that the Supplemental NPRM does not specify
which flap tracks are affected by paragraph (a) of the AD. The
commenter requests that specific part numbers and dash numbers be
listed in the final rule.
The FAA does not concur. The intent of paragraph (a) of this AD is
to include all flap tracks for Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series
airplanes with L/Ns 1 through 1585, except for certain flap tracks
which are specifically excluded in the effectivity of the service
bulletin. Accordingly, no change has been made to the final rule in
this regard.
Request to Correct Reference to Part of Accomplishment Instructions
One commenter indicates that paragraph (d) of the Supplemental
NPRM, which requires repetitive inspections for cracking in the upper
flange of the inboard track of each outboard flap at the rear spar
attachments, should refer to Part I of the Accomplishment Instructions
rather than Part II of those instructions.
The FAA concurs. The original reference in the Supplemental NPRM to
Part II was an error. The language in paragraph (d) of this final rule
has been changed accordingly.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously
described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 2,890 Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 series airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,100 airplanes of U.S.
registry will be affected by this AD.
It will take approximately 4 work hours per airplane to accomplish
the required inspections at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour.
Based on these figures, the cost impact of the required inspections on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $264,000, or $240 per airplane.
It will take approximately 12 work hours per airplane to accomplish
the required rework at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour.
Required parts will cost approximately $532. Based on these figures,
the cost impact of the required rework on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $1,377,200, or $1,252 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2002-05-07 Boeing: Amendment 39-12675. Docket 99-NM-21-AD.
Applicability: Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
series airplanes; certificated in any category; EXCEPT airplanes on
which any replacement flap tracks were installed according to Boeing
Service Bulletin 737-57-1203, dated November 15, 1990, or production
equivalent.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (f) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
Note 2: Airplanes modified according to Boeing Service Bulletin
737-57-1065 are subject to additional work as described in this AD
and in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1249, Revision 1, dated June
1, 2000.
To find and fix discrepancies of the inboard tracks of the
outboard flaps, which could result in loss of the outboard trailing
edge flaps and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane,
accomplish the following:
Initial Inspections
(a) For Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes with
line numbers (L/N) 1 through 869 inclusive, and those airplanes with
L/Ns 870 through 1585 inclusive, which either still have their
original flap tracks or which have had the original flap tracks
replaced with certain tracks as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
737-57A1249, Revision 1, including Appendix A, dated June 1, 2000:
Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, accomplish the
requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, according
to Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1249, Revision 1, including
Appendix A, dated June 1, 2000.
(1) Perform a detailed visual inspection for discrepancies
(e.g., corrosion, or missing, damaged, or migrated anti-fret strips
and tapered shims) of the rear spar attachments of the flap tracks.
[[Page 11893]]
(2) Perform detailed visual, high frequency eddy current (HFEC),
and ultrasonic inspections for cracking in the upper flange of the
inboard track of each outboard flap at the rear spar attachments.
Note 3: Inspections and rework accomplished according to Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1249, including Appendix A, dated
December 16, 1999, is considered acceptable for compliance with the
applicable action specified in this AD.
Note 4: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Repetitive Inspections
(b) For airplanes subject to paragraph (a) of this AD: If no
discrepancy is found during any inspection required by paragraph (a)
of this AD, thereafter, repeat the inspections specified in
paragraph (a) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 9 months, until
the actions required by paragraph (c) of this AD have been
accomplished.
Rework
(c) For airplanes subject to paragraph (a) of this AD: At the
applicable time specified in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this AD,
accomplish rework of the flap track assembly and aft flap track
attachments (including removal of the flap track; a detailed visual
inspection for a missing, damaged, or migrated anti-fret strip and
tapered shim of the rear spar attachments of the flap track;
replacement of the anti-fret strip with a new aluminum anti-fret
strip (or installation of an aluminum strip if no strip is
installed), as applicable; replacement of the tapered shim with a
new shim (or installation of a shim if no shim is installed); eddy
current and ultrasonic inspections for fatigue cracking of the flap
tracks; a detailed visual inspection for corrosion of the flap
tracks; and rework of attachment holes), including replacement of
the flap tracks, as applicable, by accomplishing all actions
specified in Part II of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 737-57A1249, Revision 1, including Appendix A,
dated June 1, 2000. Do these actions according to that service
bulletin, except as provided by paragraph (e) of this AD.
Accomplishment of the actions required by this paragraph constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (b) of this AD.
(1) If no discrepancy is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD: Do the rework within 24 months
after the effective date of this AD.
(2) If any discrepancy is found during any inspection required
by paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD: Do the rework prior to further
flight.
Repetitive Inspections
(d) For all airplanes: At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this AD, and thereafter at least every
24 months, perform detailed visual, HFEC, and ultrasonic inspections
for cracking in the upper flange of the inboard track of each
outboard flap at the rear spar attachments according to Part I of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
57A1249, Revision 1, including Appendix A, dated June 1, 2000.
(1) For airplanes subject to paragraph (c) of this AD, do the
inspections within 10 years after accomplishment of the rework
according to paragraph (c) of this AD.
(2) For airplanes other than those identified in paragraph
(d)(1) of this AD, do the inspections within 10 years since the
airplane's date of manufacture, or within 6 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
Repair Instructions and Exception to Procedures in Service Information
(e) If any discrepancy is found during any action required by
paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this AD, and the service bulletin
specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action; OR if any
discrepancy is found during inspections according to paragraph (d)
of this AD: Prior to further flight, repair according to a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or according to data meeting the type certification
basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing Company Designated
Engineering Representative (DER) who has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a repair method to
be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this
paragraph, the approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(g) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(h) Except as provided by paragraph (e) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
57A1249, Revision 1, including Appendix A, dated June 1, 2000. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(i) This amendment becomes effective on April 22, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 8, 2002.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-6201 Filed 3-15-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.