AD 2002-04-02
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A300 F4-605R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 F4-605R Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking of certain circumferential joints could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage in the vicinity of the upper deck cargo door.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Install external doublers at frames 29 and 33.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A300 F4-605R airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 F4-605R airplanes, that requires installation of external doublers at frames 29 and 33. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking of certain circumferential joints, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage in the vicinity of the upper deck cargo door.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7947-7949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-3849]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-390-AD; Amendment 39-12659; AD 2002-04-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 F4-605R Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 F4-605R airplanes, that
requires installation of external doublers at frames 29 and 33. The
actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking
of certain circumferential joints, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the fuselage in the vicinity of the upper deck
cargo door.
DATES: Effective March 28, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 28, 2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2797; fax (425) 227-1149.
[[Page 7948]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 F4-605R
airplanes was published in the Federal Register on April 30, 2001 (66
FR 21292). That action proposed to require installation of external
doublers at frames 29 and 33.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comment received.
Request To Expand Applicability of AD
The commenter, the manufacturer, says that French airworthiness
directive 2000-456-323(B), issued by the Direction Generale de
l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), applies to both Airbus Model A300 F4-605R
production freighters and Model A300 series airplanes that have been
converted to freighter configurations by supplemental type certificates
(STCs) approved by the DGAC. However, the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) issued by the FAA does not apply to airplanes that have been
converted to freighter configurations. The commenter requests that the
applicability of the AD be expanded to include Airbus Model A300 series
airplanes which have been converted to freighter configurations by
STC's approved by the FAA.
The FAA does not concur. The service bulletins cited by the DGAC in
the French airworthiness directive apply only to production freighters
and not to airplanes converted to freighter configurations in
accordance with STCs. To address these converted airplanes, the FAA
plans to work with the holders of STCs for those airplanes to evaluate
the upper fuselage circumferential joints for fatigue. Depending upon
the results, the FAA may issue further rulemaking addressing those
airplanes.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 32 Model A300 F4-605R airplanes of U.S.
registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately
85 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that
the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost
approximately $1,820 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $221,440 or
$6,920 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2002-04-02 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-12659. Docket 2000-NM-
390-AD.
Applicability: Model A300 F4-605R airplanes, certificated in any
category, except those on which Airbus production Modification 12081
or the modification specified by Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-
6119, Revision 01, dated September 25, 2000, has been installed.
Note 1:
This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding
applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been otherwise
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent fatigue cracking of certain circumferential joints,
which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage
in the vicinity of the upper deck cargo door, accomplish the
following:
Installation of Doublers
(a) Before the airplane accumulates 10,000 total flight cycles,
or within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Install external doublers at frames 29 and 33, in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6119, Revision 01,
dated September 25, 2000.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The installation shall be done in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin
[[Page 7949]]
A300-53-6119, Revision 01, dated September 25, 2000. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3:
The subject of this AD is addressed in French airworthiness
directive 2000-456-323(B), dated November 15, 2000.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on March 28, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 11, 2002.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-3849 Filed 2-20-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.