AD 2001-24-28
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-11 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-12 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-21 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-31 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-32 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-33 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-41 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-42 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-43 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-51 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-52 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-53 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-55 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-61 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-61F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-62 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-62F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-63 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-63F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-71 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-71F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-72 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-72F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-73 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-73F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8F-54 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8F-55 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracking of the rudder pedals adjuster hub assembly, which could lead to loss of rudder pedals control and reduction of braking capability.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the rudder pedals adjuster hub assembly for cracks using visual and eddy current inspections. Replace the assembly with a new one if cracks are detected. Accomplish a terminating action for the repetitive inspections as specified.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 15,000 total landings, or within 3,500 landings after the effective date of this AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes, serial numbers 45646 and 45928, and as listed in McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Alert Service Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1, dated February 3, 1992; certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive visual and eddy current inspections to detect cracking of the rudder pedals adjuster hub assembly, and replacement of the assembly with a new assembly, if necessary. This amendment requires accomplishment of a terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment also adds airplanes to the applicability of the existing AD. This amendment is prompted by the FAA's determination that further rulemaking is necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent loss of rudder pedals control and reduction of braking capability.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 12, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64107-64109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-30204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NM-210-AD; Amendment 39-12545; AD 2001-24-28]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series
airplanes, that currently requires repetitive visual and eddy current
inspections to detect cracking of the rudder pedals adjuster hub
assembly, and replacement of the assembly with a new assembly, if
necessary. This amendment requires accomplishment of a terminating
action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment also adds
airplanes to the applicability of the existing AD. This amendment is
prompted by the FAA's determination that further rulemaking is
necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent
loss of rudder pedals control and reduction of braking capability.
DATES: Effective January 16, 2002.
The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Alert
Service Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1, dated February 3, 1992, was
approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of
January 22, 1993 (57 FR 60115, December 18, 1992).
The incorporation by reference of the remaining service documents
is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 16,
2002.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may
be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wahib Mina, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone
(562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 92-27-06,
amendment 39-8440 (57 FR 60115, December 18, 1992), which is applicable
to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes, was published
in the Federal Register on July 23, 2001 (66 FR 38203). The action
proposed to continue to require repetitive visual and eddy current
inspections to detect cracking of the rudder pedals adjuster hub
assembly, and replacement of the assembly with a new assembly, if
necessary. That action also proposed to require accomplishment of a
terminating action for the repetitive inspections, and to add airplanes
to the applicability of the existing AD.
[[Page 64108]]
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comment received.
Request To Withdraw Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) or Remove
Mandatory Requirement for Replacement
The commenter requests that the FAA withdraw the NPRM, since the
inspections required by existing AD 92-27-06 provide an appropriate
degree of safety assurance. The commenter states that there have been
no loss of rudder pedal control incidents reported since the start of
the inspections required by AD 92-27-06. The commenter further states
that the loss of rudder pedal control by a flightcrew member is a
temporary unsafe condition, since the other flightcrew member can
immediately control the airplane with his/her rudder pedals. The
commenter also states that of the 107 inspections it has performed on
DC-8 rudder pedal adjuster hub assemblies since June 1994, no
inspections have resulted in finding cracks. The commenter points out
that a review of the FAA Service Difficulty Reports database reveals
that no DC-8 rudder pedal control has been lost during flight or taxi
because of a cracked rudder pedal adjuster hub assembly.
This same commenter suggests in lieu of withdrawing the NPRM to
remove the compliance time of ``Prior to the accumulation of 15,000
total landings, or within 3,500 landings after the effective date of
this AD'' in paragraph (e) of the NPRM, so that the replacement
requirement is optional.
The FAA does not agree with the commenter to withdraw the NPRM or
remove the mandatory replacement requirement. As specified in the
``Background'' section of the NPRM, the FAA has determined that, based
on the results of investigations described in the NPRM and
recommendations of the Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ATSRAC), corrective action is necessary to minimize the
potential hazards associated with wire and mechanical flight control
systems degradation and related causal factors (e.g., inadequate
maintenance, contamination, improper repair, and mechanical damage).
In addition, the FAA has determined that long-term continued
operational safety will be better assured by modifications or design
changes to remove the source of the problem, rather than by repetitive
inspections. Long-term inspections may not be providing the degree of
safety assurance necessary for the transport airplane fleet. This,
coupled with a better understanding of the human factors associated
with numerous repetitive inspections, has led the FAA to consider
placing less emphasis on special procedures and more emphasis on design
improvements. The terminating action required by paragraph (e) of this
final rule is consistent with these considerations.
Clarification of Paragraph Reference
Paragraph (c) of the proposed AD states ``If no crack is detected
as a result of the inspections required by paragraph (a) of this AD,
repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 3,500 landings.'' The
FAA's intent was that the repeat inspections be accomplished if no
crack is detected as a result of the inspection required by paragraph
(a) or (b) of this AD, as indicated in service bulletins referenced in
the AD. Therefore, we have revised the final rule accordingly.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously
described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 264 Model DC-8 series airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 245
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
The inspection that is currently required by AD 92-27-06 takes
approximately 3 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $44,100, or $180 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The new actions that are required by this AD will take
approximately 8 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately
$4,296 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the new
requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$1,170,120, or $4,776 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-8440 (57 FR
60115, December 18, 1992), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), amendment 39-12545, to read as follows:
[[Page 64109]]
2001-24-28 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12545. Docket 2001-NM-
210-AD. Supersedes AD 92-27-06, Amendment 39-8440.
Applicability: Model DC-8 series airplanes, serial numbers 45646
and 45928, and as listed in McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Alert Service
Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1, dated February 3, 1992; certificated
in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent loss of rudder pedals control and reduction of
braking capability, accomplish the following:
Inspection
(a) For airplanes listed in McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Alert Service
Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1, dated February 3, 1992: Prior to the
accumulation of 15,000 landings or within 270 days after January 22,
1993 (the effective date of AD 92-27-06, amendment 39-8440),
whichever occurs later, conduct a visual and eddy current inspection
to detect cracks of the rudder pedals adjuster hub assembly, part
number (P/N) 4616066, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas DC-8
Alert Service Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1, dated February 3, 1992,
or Revision 2, dated August 5, 1992; or McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC8-27A275R03, Revision 03, dated April 5, 1996. As
of the effective date of this AD only McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC8-27A275R03, Revision 03, dated April 5, 1996,
shall be used.
(b) For airplanes having serial numbers 45646 and 45928: Prior
to the accumulation of 15,000 total landings, or within 270 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, conduct
a visual and eddy current inspection to detect cracks of the rudder
pedals adjuster hub assembly, P/N 4616066, in accordance with
McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Alert Service Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1,
dated February 3, 1992, or Revision 2, dated August 5, 1992; or
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC8-27A275R03, Revision 03,
dated April 5, 1996. As of the effective date of this AD, only
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC8-27A275R03, Revision 03,
dated April 5, 1996, shall be used.
No Crack Found During Inspection Required by Paragraph (a) or (b) of
This AD: Repetitive Inspections
(c) If no crack is detected as a result of the inspections
required by paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD, repeat the inspections
at intervals not to exceed 3,500 landings.
Any Crack Found: Replacement and Repetitive Inspections
(d) If any crack is detected as a result of the inspections
required by paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this AD, prior to further
flight, replace the rudder pedals adjuster hub assembly, P/N
4616066, with a new assembly, P/N 5965435-1, in accordance with
McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC8-27A275R03, Revision 03,
dated April 5, 1996. Accomplishment of the replacement constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of
this AD.
Terminating Action
(e) Prior to the accumulation of 15,000 total landings, or
within 3,500 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, replace the existing adjuster hub assembly with a new
assembly, P/N 5965435-1, per McDonnell Douglas Alert Service
Bulletin DC8-27A275R03, Revision 03, dated April 5, 1996.
Accomplishment of the replacement constitutes terminating action for
the requirements of this AD.
Spares
(f) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
an adjuster hub assembly, P/N 4616066, on any airplane.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(h) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(i) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas DC-8 Alert Service Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1, dated
February 3, 1992; McDonnell Douglas DC-8 Alert Service Bulletin A27-
275, Revision 2, dated August 5, 1992; or McDonnell Douglas Alert
Service Bulletin DC8-27A275R03, Revision 03, dated April 5, 1996; as
applicable.
(1) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas DC-8
Alert Service Bulletin A27-275, Revision 1, dated February 3, 1992,
was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 22, 1993 (57 FR 60115, December 18, 1992).
(2) The incorporation by reference of the remaining service
documents is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft
Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach,
California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-
L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or
at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(j) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2002.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 28, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-30204 Filed 12-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.