AD 2001-23-03
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | 172N | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | 172P | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | 172RG | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | F172N | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | F172P | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | FR172J | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | FR172K | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
| aircraft | Cessna Aircraft Company | R172K | Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Chafing between the map light switch and the adjacent fuel line, which could result in a fuel leak and an in-flight fire.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Repetitively inspect the fuel line and map light switch for chafing or arcing, replace damaged parts, install a switch cover (insulator) if missing or damaged, and replace the fuel line if damaged.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K airplanes, including serial numbers F17201515 through F17201639 for Model F172N.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 80-04- 08, which requires inspecting (one-time) the fuel line and map light switch in the left hand forward door post for chafing or arcing on certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Model 172N, R172K, F172N, and FR172K airplanes and repairing any damage found. AD 80-04-08 also requires providing at least a 0.50-inch clearance between the map light switch and the fuel line; and installing a switch cover (insulator) over the map light switch. This AD requires you to extend the inspections and installation of the switch cover requirement to certain 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K series airplanes. This AD also requires replacement of the fuel line, if damaged; and makes the switch cover inspection and replacement repetitive. This AD is the result of FAA receiving several reports of incidents of electrical shorts on Cessna Model 172N airplanes. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct any chafing between the map light switch and the bordering fuel line, which could result in a fuel leak and an in-flight fire.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57361-57364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-28332]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2001 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 57361]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-CE-26-AD; Amendment 39-12500; AD 2001-23-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N,
172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 80-04-
08, which requires inspecting (one-time) the fuel line and map light
switch in the left hand forward door post for chafing or arcing on
certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Model 172N, R172K, F172N, and
FR172K airplanes and repairing any damage found. AD 80-04-08 also
requires providing at least a 0.50-inch clearance between the map light
switch and the fuel line; and installing a switch cover (insulator)
over the map light switch. This AD requires you to extend the
inspections and installation of the switch cover requirement to certain
172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K series
airplanes. This AD also requires replacement of the fuel line, if
damaged; and makes the switch cover inspection and replacement
repetitive. This AD is the result of FAA receiving several reports of
incidents of electrical shorts on Cessna Model 172N airplanes. The
actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct any
chafing between the map light switch and the bordering fuel line, which
could result in a fuel leak and an in-flight fire.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on December 27, 2001.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of
December 27, 2001.
ADDRESSES: You may get the service information referenced in this AD
from the Cessna Aircraft Company, PO Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277;
telephone: (316) 517-5800, facsimile: (316) 942-9006. You may examine
this information at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No.
2000-CE-26-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Clyde Erwin, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room
100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209, telephone: (316)
946-4149; facsimile: (316) 946-4407.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Has FAA taken any action to this point? The FAA issued AD 80-04-08,
Amendment 39-3696, February 16, 1980, in order to preclude the
possibility of a fuel leak or an in-flight fire due to contact between
a map light switch and an adjacent fuel line of certain Cessna Models
172N, R172K, F172N, and FR172K airplanes. AD 80-04-08 requires that you
do the following on the affected airplanes:
--Visually inspect the fuel line and map light switch located in the
left hand forward door post for chafing or arcing and replace damaged
parts as necessary. If not already existing, provide at least a 0.50-
inch clearance between the map light switch and the fuel line in
accordance with procedures in FAA Advisory Circular 43.13-1A.
--Install a cover (insulator), Cessna Part Number 0511080-1, over the
map light switch in accordance with Cessna Single Engine Service
Information Letter SE80-3 and Supplement #1 thereto, both dated January
21, 1980.
AD 80-04-08 was the result of instances of chafing between the map
light switch and the adjacent fuel line on the affected airplanes. When
the chafing caused an electrical short, insulation melted from the map
light wire and a hole was burned in the fuel line.
What has happened to necessitate further AD action? Since issuance
of AD 80-04-08, FAA has received several reports of incidents of
electrical shorts on Cessna Model 172N airplanes. These electrical
shorts have resulted because the mounting screws may be elongated or
broken out on the affected airplanes or doorpost cover shapes have
changed over time. Switch covers may:
--Deteriorate over time;
--Receive damage from service activities,
--Be left off after service activities;
--Not be mounted properly; or
--Not be used in after-market interior installations.
AD 80-04-08 applied to only certain serial numbers and did not
cover all of the models that have map light switches in the doorpost.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to
amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to certain Cessna Model 172N, 172P,
R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K series airplanes. This
proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) on January 8, 2001 (66 FR 1273). The NPRM proposed to
supersede AD-80-04-08 with a new AD that would require:
--Repetitively inspecting for the existence and damage to the cover
(insulator) for the doorpost map light switch;
--Installing a cover (insulator) if missing or damaged; and
--Replacing the fuel line, if damaged.
Was the public invited to comment? The FAA encouraged interested
persons to participate in the making of this amendment. At the request
of several commenters, we issued an NPRM to extend the comment period
from February 12, 2001, to April 13, 2001. This document was published
in the Federal Register on February 12, 2001 (66 FR 9779). A summary of
the comments received on both of these documents follow, along with our
responses.
[[Page 57362]]
Comment Issue No. 1: Agree That This AD Will Correct an Unsafe
Condition and Provide Aviation Safety
What is the commenter's concern? One commenter suggests that the
proposed AD is necessary because the doorposts in these aircraft have
become conduits for wiring of add-on systems accomplished by the field
approval process. The commenter suggests that repetitive inspections
would significantly enhance the safety and reliability of airplane
operation.
Several commenters agree that FAA is correct in adding aircraft
serial numbers to the proposed AD.
What is FAA's response to the concern? Since the comments agree
with the NPRM as written, we are not changing the final rule as a
result of these comments.
Comment Issue No. 2: AD 80-04-08 Already Addresses the Unsafe
Condition
What is the commenter's concern? Several commenters suggest that a
new AD is not necessary to correct the unsafe condition. They believe
AD 80-04-08 adequately addresses this issue. The commenters suggest
that if any further action regarding this unsafe condition is taken,
FAA should either revise or suspend the current AD. Two commenters
suggest that accomplishment of the manufacturer's service bulletin by
the owners/operators of the affected airplanes will correct the unsafe
condition.
What is FAA's response to the concern? We do not concur that AD 80-
04-08 addresses the unsafe condition. Reports indicate electrical
shorts on Cessna Model 172N airplanes have occurred after compliance
with AD 80-04-08. We have determined that the electrical shorts
resulted because the doorpost cover deteriorated over time from heat
and sunlight, which caused the attachment bolt holes to become
elongated or broken out and resulted in the fuel line and the switch
contact to become jammed together. AD 80-04-08 did not cover all of the
airplane models that have map light switches in the doorpost. In
addition, AD 80-04-08 only required an initial inspection so no
requirement exists for detecting damaged doorpost covers that occur
after the initial inspection. Since we are adding additional
requirements and additional airplanes, we must supersede the current AD
because it provides an additional burden over that in AD 80-04-08.
We concur that accomplishment of the referenced service bulletin
will correct the unsafe condition. However, we can only require
compliance through AD action.
We are not changing the AD based on these comments.
Comment Issue No. 3: The Condition Results From Poor or Lack of
Maintenance
What is the commenter's concern? Several commenters suggest that
the conditions referenced in the proposed AD are a result of incorrect
maintenance activities. The commenters state that, if damage to the
doorpost cover is a result of maintenance activities, e.g., left off or
not properly mounted, an AD would not correct this situation. These
conditions result from incorrect aircraft maintenance and airframe and
powerplant (A&P) mechanic functions and not AD requirements. If these
problems arise, the pilot should report the condition so that
corrective maintenance can be performed.
What is FAA's response to the concern? We do not concur. The unsafe
condition is a result of the doorpost cover deteriorating over time
because of the material it is made of, exposure to the heat, and use.
The deterioration of the doorpost cover causes the attachment bolt
holes to become elongated or broken out, which results in the fuel line
and the switch contact to become jammed together.
We are not changing the AD based on these comments.
Comment Issue No. 4: Correct the Applicability
What is the commenter's concern? Several commenters suggest that
FAA should clarify whether Model F172N airplanes, serial numbers
F17201515 through F17201639, should be included in the AD. We infer
that the commenters believe that they should be included.
What is FAA's response to the concern? We concur. We inadvertently
left Model F172N airplanes, serial numbers F17201515 through F17201639,
out of the proposed AD. These airplane models will be covered in the
applicability of this AD.
We are changing the final rule to include these airplane models.
None of these airplanes are currently on the U.S. Register so this
would not add any additional burden upon the public.
Comment Issue No. 5: Extend the Comment Period 60 Days
What is the commenter's concern? Two commenters request the comment
period be extended to allow the FAA a greater opportunity to hear from
more people in the aviation community.
What is FAA's response to the concern? We concur with this comment.
The comment period was extended on the NPRM from February 12, 2001, to
April 13, 2001, to give the public an additional 60 days to respond.
Comment Issue No. 6: Change or Eliminate the Repetitive Inspection
Interval
What is the commenter's concern? Several commenters suggest that
the need for repetitive inspections are not necessary because they add
no safety value. Specifically, one commenter suggests that the doorpost
cover, switch, insulator, and fuel line should be inspected as part of
the annual inspection (or when any work is performed in that area) or
extended to 5 year intervals because the material the doorpost cover is
made of will not deteriorate in a year's time. Another commenter
suggests that the affected area is not designed for repeated access and
could, in fact, contribute to and exacerbate the problem addressed by
the proposed AD or create new ones. All commenters suggest that if
required maintenance is done properly, there would be no need for
repetitive inspections because the switch retaining screws will remain
installed until they are removed; and, if installed correctly, the
insulator is designed as such that it will function properly until it
is removed.
What is FAA's response to the concern? We do not concur. As
discussed previously, electrical shorts result because the doorpost
cover deteriorates over time from heat and sunlight. Our analysis shows
that 12 months is a reasonable time period for detecting such a
problem. A longer period would not provide the assurance that the
condition was detected before a serious problem developed. We have
determined that, if correctly accessed, new problems will not occur.
The 12 month repetitive inspection interval should also coincide with
annual inspections.
We are not changing the final rule as a result of these comments.
FAA's Determination
What is FAA's final determination on this issue? After careful
review of all available information related to the subject presented
above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for minor editorial
corrections. We determined that these minor corrections:
--Will not change the meaning of the AD; and
--Will not add any additional burden upon the public than was already
proposed.
[[Page 57363]]
Cost Impact
How many airplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD
affects 7,750 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on owners/operators of the
affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to accomplish the
initial inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost airplane Total cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 workhour x $60 per hour = No parts required $60 7,750 x $60 = $465,000.
$60. for the inspection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has no way of determining the number of repetitive
inspections each owner/operator will incur over the life of each of the
affected airplanes, or how many covers (insulators) or fuel lines will
need to be replaced. If replacement parts are required as a result of
the inspection, the estimated cost per airplane for the cover
(insulator) is $6.00. The cost for a replacement fuel line varies from
$26.00 to $129.00, plus labor, depending on the airplane model.
What is the difference between the cost impact of this AD and the
cost impact of AD 80-04-08? The cost impact of this AD is more than
currently required by AD 80-04-08. The differences between this AD and
AD 80-04-08 are the additional airplane models that will be affected
and the repetitive inspections each affected airplane owner/operator
will incur over the life of the airplane.
Regulatory Impact
Does this AD impact various entities? The regulations adopted
herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not
have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For
the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies andProcedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy
of the final evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal AviationRegulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
80-04-08, Amendment 39-3696, and by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2001-23-03 Cessna Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-12500; Docket No.
2000-CE-26-AD; Supersedes AD 80-04-08, Amendment 39-3696.
(a) What airplanes are affected by this AD? This AD affects the
following Cessna model airplanes, certificated in any category:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model Serial No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
172N.............................. 17267585 through 17270049; 17270051
through 17274009; 17261445,
17261578, and 17270050.
172P.............................. 17274010 through 17276654.
172RG............................. 172RG0001 through 172RG1191; and
691.
F172N............................. F17201515 through F17202039.
F172P............................. F17202040 through F17202254.
FR172J............................ FR17200531 through 17200590.
FR172K............................ FR17200591 through 17200675.
R172K............................. R1722000 through R1723454; and 680.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate
any of the above airplanes must comply with this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by
this AD are intended to detect and correct any chafing between the
map light switch and the bordering fuel line, which could result in
a fuel leak or an in-flight fire.
(d) What actions must I accomplish to address this problem? To
address this problem, you must accomplish the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the doorpost map Initially inspect Do this action
light switch insulator within the next 100 following the
(part number 0511080-1) to hours time-in- ACCOMPLISHMENT
verify it is installed and service (TIS) after INSTRUCTIONS
(if installed) not damaged. December 27, 2001 section of Cessna
(the effective date Service Bulletin
of this AD), or SEB00-1, dated
within the next 12 January 17, 2000.
calendar months
after December 27,
2001 (the effective
date of this AD),
whichever occurs
first. Repetitively
inspect thereafter
at intervals not to
exceed 12 calendar
months.
[[Page 57364]]
(2) If a switch cover Before further Do this action
(insulator) is not flight after the following the
installed or is damaged in inspection where ACCOMPLISHMENT
any way, install a new any damage is found INSTRUCTIONS
insulator (part number or the cover is section of Cessna
0511080-1). found missing. Service Bulletin
SEB00-1, dated
January 17, 2000,
and the Cessna
Manufacturer's
Maintenance Manual.
(3) If the fuel line is Before further Do this action
damaged in any way, install flight after the following the
a new fuel line. The inspection where ACCOMPLISHMENT
replacement fuel line part any damage is found. INSTRUCTIONS
number varies with aircraft section of Cessna
model. Service Bulletin
SEB00-1, dated
January 17, 2000,
and the Cessna
Manufacturer's
Maintenance Manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1: The compliance times specified in Cessna Service
Bulletin SEB00-1, dated January 17, 2000, are different from those
required by this AD. The compliance times in this AD take precedence
over those in the service bulletin.
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way?
(1) You may use an alternative method of compliance or adjust
the compliance time if:
(i) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent
level of safety; and
(ii) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
approves your alternative. Submit your request through an FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, Wichita ACO.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance approved in accordance
with AD 80-04-08, which is superseded by this AD, are not approved
as alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
Note 2: This AD applies to each airplane identified in paragraph
(a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered,
or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For
airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the
performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request
should include an assessment of the effect of the modification,
alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD;
and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe condition, specific
actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already-approved
alternative methods of compliance? Contact Mr. Clyde Erwin,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801
Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas
67209, telephone: (316) 946-4149; facsimile: (316) 946-4407.
(g) What if I need to fly the airplane to another location to
comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your airplane to a location where
you can accomplish the requirements of this AD.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accordance
with Cessna Service Bulletin SEB00-1 and Accomplishment
Instructions, dated January 17, 2000. The Director of the Federal
Register approved this incorporation by reference under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You can get copies from the Cessna
Aircraft Company, PO Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277. You can look
at copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
(i) Does this AD action affect any existing AD actions? This
amendment supersedes AD 80-04-08, Amendment 39-3696.
(j) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment
becomes effective on December 27, 2001.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 5, 2001.
Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 01-28332 Filed 11-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.