AD 2001-17-20
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | 707 720 | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 707 and 720 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Damaged wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps could cause electrical arcing, puncturing the conduit and resulting in an explosion or fire adjacent to the fuel tank.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Replace the wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps with new wiring, install Teflon sleeving on the wiring, and perform repetitive inspections to detect wiring damage or fuel leaks. Corrective actions, including finding and repairing fuel leaks, replacing wiring, conduit, or installing new Teflon sleeving, must be taken if electrical arcing, exposed copper wire, or fuel leaks are detected.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the compliance time specified in the referenced service bulletin, unless accomplished previously.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 707 and 720 series airplanes, line numbers 1 through 941 inclusive, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 707 and 720 series airplanes, that requires replacement of wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps with new wiring, installation of Teflon sleeving on the wiring, and associated actions. This amendment also requires repetitive inspections to detect damage of the wiring or evidence of a fuel leak. This amendment is necessary to detect and correct damaged wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps, which could cause electrical arcing that could puncture the conduit containing the wire, and result in an explosion or fire adjacent to the fuel tank. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44954-44957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-21395]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-318-AD; Amendment 39-12411; AD 2001-17-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 707 and 720 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 707 and 720 series airplanes, that
requires replacement of wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override
pumps with new
[[Page 44955]]
wiring, installation of Teflon sleeving on the wiring, and associated
actions. This amendment also requires repetitive inspections to detect
damage of the wiring or evidence of a fuel leak. This amendment is
necessary to detect and correct damaged wiring for the fuel boost pumps
and override pumps, which could cause electrical arcing that could
puncture the conduit containing the wire, and result in an explosion or
fire adjacent to the fuel tank. This action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective October 1, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of October 1, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sulmo Mariano, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone
(425) 227-2686; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 707 and 720
series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on March 29,
2001 (66 FR 17123). That action proposed to require replacement of
wiring for the fuel boost pumps and override pumps with new wiring,
installation of Teflon sleeving on the wiring, and associated actions.
That action also proposed to require repetitive inspections to detect
damage of the wiring or evidence of a fuel leak.
Comments Received
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. The FAA has duly considered several
comments received from a single commenter.
Refer to Revised Service Information
The commenter requests that we revise the proposed rule to
reference Boeing Service Bulletin A3500, Revision 1, dated April 26,
2001. (The proposed rule refers to the original issue of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin A3500, dated July 27, 2000, as the appropriate source
of service information for doing the proposed actions.) The commenter
notes Revision 1 of the service bulletin contains updated information,
such as changes to part numbers, but necessitates no additional work on
airplanes modified per the original issue of the service bulletin.
We concur and have revised paragraphs (a) and (b) of this final
rule to reference Revision 1 of the service bulletin. We have also
added a new note, Note 4, which states that accomplishment of the
actions required by this AD prior to the effective date of this AD
according to the original issue of the service bulletin is acceptable
for compliance with this AD.
Refer to Service Bulletin for Rework Instructions
The commenter requests that we revise paragraph (b) of the proposed
AD to remove the instructions in that paragraph and instead refer to
the appropriate section of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
referenced service bulletin. The commenter states that, as written,
paragraph (b) would require an operator to replace the wiring, Teflon
sleeving, and conduit with new parts if a small fuel leak is found,
even if no evidence of electrical arcing or an exposed conductor is
found. The commenter notes that the intent of the proposed AD is to
require replacement of the wiring and sleeving only when there is
evidence of arcing or an exposed conductor.
We concur with the commenter's request and rationale. Therefore, we
have revised paragraph (b) to require, if any electrical arcing or
exposed copper wire or evidence of a fuel leak is detected during any
inspection per paragraph (b), accomplishment of applicable corrective
actions (including finding the source of any fuel leak and repairing
the affected area, replacing the wiring, replacing the conduit, or
installing new Teflon sleeving; as applicable) according to the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
Revise Cost Impact
The commenter asks that we revise the Cost Impact section of the
proposed AD to reduce the number of affected U.S.-registered airplanes
from 65 to 22 airplanes. The commenter states that the airplane
manufacturer's records show that there are only 22 U.S.-registered
Boeing Model 707 and 720 series airplanes in service.
We do not concur. The figure of 22 U.S.-registered airplanes cited
by the commenter does not include all of the Model 707 series airplanes
operated by the U.S. military. When these airplanes are included in the
total, there are 65 U.S. airplanes affected by this AD. No change is
necessary in this regard.
The commenter also asks us to revise the Cost Impact section of the
proposed AD to increase the number of work hours necessary to do the
required actions from 27 to 38 work hours. The commenter states that
the referenced service bulletin provides a figure of 38 work hours.
We partially concur. The figure of 38 work hours in the service
bulletin includes time for gaining access and closing up. The cost
impact analysis in AD rulemaking actions typically includes only the
``direct'' costs of the specific actions required by the AD, and does
not include incidental costs, such as the time required to gain access
and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions. Because incidental costs may vary significantly
from operator to operator, they are almost impossible to calculate.
However, we find that the time needed for testing may be included in
the cost estimate of this AD. Therefore, the estimate for the number of
work hours for the required actions stated in the Cost Impact section
of this final rule has been revised from 27 to 31 work hours.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously
described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 261 Model 707 and 720 series airplanes of
the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 65
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
The replacement and initial associated actions will take
approximately 31 work hours per airplane, at the average labor rate of
$60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the cost
impact of these required actions on U.S. operators to be $120,900, or
$1,860 per airplane.
The inspection for damage of the wiring or evidence of a fuel leak
will take approximately 3 work hours per airplane, at the average labor
rate of $60
[[Page 44956]]
per work hour. Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the cost
impact of this required inspection on U.S. operators to be $11,700, or
$180 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-17-20 Boeing: Amendment 39-12411. Docket 2000-NM-318-AD.
Applicability: Model 707 and 720 series airplanes, line numbers
1 through 941 inclusive, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct damaged wiring for the fuel boost pumps
and override pumps, which could cause electrical arcing that could
puncture the conduit containing the wire and result in an explosion
or fire adjacent to the fuel tank, accomplish the following:
Replacement of Wiring, Installation of Sleeving, and Associated Actions
(a) Within 1 year or 4,000 flight hours after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace the wiring for the fuel
boost pumps and override pumps, install Teflon sleeving over the
wiring, and do all associated actions, per the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin A3500, Revision 1, dated
April 26, 2001. The associated actions include performing a general
visual inspection of the area around each fuel boost pump and
override pump for evidence of a fuel leak; finding the source of any
fuel leak and repairing the affected area; replacing the conduit, if
required; and performing a detailed visual inspection of the wiring
installed in the conduit for evidence of electrical arcing or a fuel
leak, or exposed copper wire. If replacement of the conduit is
deferred per the service bulletin, repeat the inspection for fuel
leaks every 500 flight hours until the conduit is replaced, and
replace the conduit within 6,000 flight hours or 18 months,
whichever occurs first.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Note 4: Use of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin A3500, dated July
27, 2000, to accomplish the actions required by this AD prior to the
effective date of this AD is considered acceptable for compliance
with this AD.
Repetitive Inspections
(b) After replacement of the wiring per paragraph (a) of this
AD, repeat the detailed visual inspection of the wiring for the fuel
boost pumps and override pumps for damage, such as evidence of
electrical arcing or exposed copper wire, or evidence of a fuel
leak. Repeat the inspection at least every 30,000 flight hours, per
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin A3500,
Revision 1, dated April 26, 2001. If any electrical arcing or
exposed copper wire or evidence of a fuel leak is detected during
any inspection per this paragraph, before further flight, do the
applicable corrective actions (including finding the source of any
fuel leak and repairing the affected area, replacing the wiring,
replacing the conduit, or installing new Teflon sleeving; as
applicable) according to the Accomplishment Instructions of the
service bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 5: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin A3500, Revision 1, dated April 26, 2001. This incorporation
by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
[[Page 44957]]
Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on October 1, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-21395 Filed 8-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.