AD 2001-17-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Chafing and damage to electrical wires of the cockpit due to improper routing during production, which could result in electrical arcing, fire, and smoke in the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Within 6 months after the effective date, perform a one-time general visual inspection of the electrical wiring on the right side of the cockpit to detect chafing or damaged wires. If chafing is found, reposition the wires and tighten the wire clamps. If damaged wires are found, repair or replace them as necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 6 months of the effective date
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A117, dated May 18, 2000, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes, that requires a one-time general visual inspection of the electrical wiring of the right side of the cockpit to determine if the electrical wiring is chafing against the observer station and to detect damaged wires; and corrective actions, if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent chafing and damage to electrical wires of the cockpit and consequent electrical arcing due to wires that were routed improperly during production of the airplane, which could result in fire and smoke in the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44047-44049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-20932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-185-AD; Amendment 39-12396; AD 2001-17-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes,
that requires a one-time general visual inspection of the electrical
wiring of the right side of the cockpit to determine if the electrical
wiring is chafing against the observer station and to detect damaged
wires; and corrective actions, if necessary. This action is necessary
to prevent chafing and damage to electrical wires of the cockpit and
consequent electrical arcing due to wires that were routed improperly
during production of the airplane, which could result in fire and smoke
in the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified
unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective September 26, 2001.
[[Page 44048]]
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of September 26, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data
and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). This information may
be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Portwood, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5350; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
MD-11 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
February 20, 2001 (66 FR 10858). That action proposed to require a one-
time general visual inspection of the electrical wiring of the right
side of the cockpit to determine if the electrical wiring is chafing
against the observer station and to detect damaged wires; and
corrective actions, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Address Change for Obtaining Service Information
The airplane manufacturer states that the referenced department
name, number, and mail code of the address for obtaining service
information are incorrect in the proposed AD. The correct address is
Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). The airplane manufacturer
requests that the proposed AD be revised accordingly. The FAA agrees
and has revised this address in the final rule.
Delay Issuance of Final Rule
One commenter requests that the FAA delay issuance of the final
rule until an on-aircraft verfication has been performed. The FAA does
not agree. To delay this final rule would be inappropriate, since we
have determined that an unsafe condition exists and that an inspection
must be conducted to ensure continued operational safety.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously
described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 148 Model MD-11 series airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 43
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will
take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the required
inspection, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection required by this AD
on U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,580, or $60 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-17-05 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12396. Docket 2000-NM-
185-AD.
Applicability: Model MD-11 series airplanes, as listed in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A117, dated May 18, 2000; certificated
in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
[[Page 44049]]
To prevent chafing and damage to electrical wires of the cockpit
and consequent electrical arcing due to wires that were routed
improperly during production of the airplane, which could result in
fire and smoke in the airplane, accomplish the following:
One-Time General Visual Inspection
(a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
one-time general visual inspection of the electrical wiring of the
right side of the cockpit to determine if the electrical wiring is
chafing against the observer station and to detect damaged wires,
per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A117, dated May 18, 2000.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
Condition 1 (No Chafing)
(b) If all electrical wires are found not to be chafing against
the observer station during the inspection required by paragraph (a)
of this AD, no further action is required by this AD.
Condition 2 (Chafing and No Wire Damage)
(c) If any electrical wire is found to be chafing against the
observer station and if no wire is found damaged during the
inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, before further
flight, loosen the wire clamps, reposition the wires, and tighten
the wire clamps, per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A117,
dated May 18, 2000.
Condition 3 (Chafing and Wire Damage)
(d) If any electrical wire is found to be chafing against the
observer station and if any wire is found damaged during the
inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, before further
flight, do the action specified in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of
this AD, as applicable, AND do the action specified in paragraph
(d)(3) of this AD; per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-24A117,
dated May 18, 2000.
(1) For damage within repairable limits: Repair damaged
insulation.
(2) For damage outside repairable limits: Replace damaged wires
with new wires.
(3) Loosen the wire clamps, reposition the wires, and tighten
the wire clamps.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(g) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11-24A117, dated May 18, 2000. This incorporation
by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024). Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(h) This amendment becomes effective on September 26, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 14, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-20932 Filed 8-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.