AD 2001-15-01
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727-100 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-100 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-200C Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-400 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-500 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-600 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-700 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-800 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 757-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 757-200CB Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 757-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate correctly, which could result in the slide being unusable during an emergency evacuation and consequent injury to passengers or airplane crewmembers.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Modify the latch assembly of the escape slides by replacing existing spring pins with new spring pins made from corrosion-resistant material. For certain airplanes, install a cover assembly on the trigger housing of the inflation cylinder on the escape slides.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 18 months after the effective date of the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 727, 737 (including 737-200C), 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 series airplanes. This AD requires modification of the latch assembly of the escape slides. For certain airplanes, this AD also requires installation of a cover assembly on the trigger housing of the inflation cylinder on the escape slides. This action is necessary to prevent failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate correctly, which could result in the slide being unusable during an emergency evacuation and consequent injury to passengers or airplane crewmembers. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38361-38365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-18137]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-159-AD; Amendment 39-12335; AD 2001-15-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-
200CB, and 757-300 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB, and
757-300 series airplanes. This AD requires modification of the latch
assembly of the escape slides. For certain airplanes, this AD also
requires installation of a cover assembly on the trigger housing of the
inflation cylinder on the escape slides. This action is necessary to
prevent failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate correctly,
which could result in the slide being unusable during an emergency
evacuation and consequent injury to passengers or airplane crewmembers.
This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective August 28, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the
[[Page 38362]]
regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of
August 28, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Ladderud, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2780; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 727, 737,
757-200, 757-200CB, and 757-300 series airplanes was published in the
Federal Register on February 15, 2001 (66 FR 10384). That action
proposed to require modification of the latch assembly of the escape
slides. For certain airplanes, that action also proposed to require
installation of a cover assembly on the trigger housing of the
inflation cylinder on the escape slides.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Support for the Proposed Rule
One commenter supports the proposed rule.
Identify Additional Affected Airplane Model
One commenter requests that the FAA revise the proposed rule to
identify an additional affected airplane model. The commenter states
that Boeing Model 737-200C airplanes are included in the effectivity
listing of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1405, dated May 25, 2000, but
points out that these airplanes were not identified in the proposed
rule with Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes.
The FAA concurs with the commenter's request. Though the FAA
inadvertently failed to refer to Model 737-200C series airplanes
separately from Model 737-200 series airplanes in the proposed rule,
these airplanes are affected by this AD. Therefore, the ``Cost Impact''
section, the applicability statement, and Table 1 of this final rule
have been revised to specifically identify Model 737-200C series
airplanes along with the other airplane models affected by this AD.
Allow Installation of Unmodified Slide Latch
One commenter requests that the FAA remove paragraph (b) from the
proposed AD. (That paragraph, the ``Spares'' paragraph, would prohibit
installation of certain escape slide assemblies or escape latch
assemblies after the effective date of this AD.) The commenter states
that an operator may replace an escape slide on an airplane at any time
due to a maintenance discrepancy or the slide reaching its overhaul
threshold. The commenter notes that, on certain fleets, the slide latch
is part of the complete escape slide assembly; therefore, the latch is
replaced when a new slide is installed. The commenter states that, by
not allowing the installation of a non-modified latch prior to the
compliance time required by the proposed AD, the operator's entire
spares inventory of escape slides would have to be modified according
to the proposed AD before the AD becomes effective.
The FAA concurs with the commenter's request. Operators must comply
with the requirements of this AD by the specified compliance time. If
an operator must install a slide, it is their responsibility to ensure
that all affected parts of that slide conform to the requirements of
this AD by the compliance deadline. Accordingly, paragraph (b) of the
proposed rule has not been included in this final rule. (Operators
should note, however, that once an airplane has been modified according
to this AD, the airplane cannot be modified in any way that negates
accomplishment of the actions in this AD--i.e., a modified latch
assembly cannot be replaced with an unmodified assembly.)
Consider Impact of Previously Issued AD
One commenter states that the FAA did not adequately consider AD
90-12-11 R1, amendment 39-6683, when it proposed this AD. The commenter
points out that AD 90-12-11 R1 requires repetitive inspections of all
Boeing Model 727, 737, and 757 series airplanes with escape slides
having release cables installed. Escape slides with such release cables
installed do not have the split ring assembly that the proposed AD
would require to be replaced on certain airplanes. The commenter
further notes that Boeing has issued certain service bulletins that
provide instructions for replacing release cables on escape slides with
release chains, which eliminates the need for the inspections required
by AD 90-12-11 R1. The commenter states that it operates some airplanes
that have not been modified according to these service bulletins, so
the airplanes are still equipped with escape slides with release cables
(and without the split ring assembly). The commenter asks whether the
FAA intends to require the installation of escape slides with release
chains on all subject airplanes as part of this AD, or if escape slides
with release cables are still considered to be acceptable, provided
that the airplanes continue to be repetitively inspected according to
AD 90-12-11 R1.
The FAA concurs that clarification is necessary with regard to the
requirements of AD 90-12-11 R1. The modification of the escape slide
latch assembly required by this AD involves two actions for certain
airplanes. The first action involves replacement of existing spring
pins with new spring pins. While AD 90-12-11 R1 requires repetitive
inspections of the slide release latch assembly for frayed or broken
cables, that AD does not require inspections for corrosion of the
spring pins because the spring pins cannot be properly inspected for
corrosion. Therefore, the replacement of the existing spring pins with
new spring pins is necessary for all airplanes subject to this AD. The
second action that is part of the modification involves replacement of
the existing split ring which attaches the chain assembly to the latch
block assembly, with a clevis. In response to the commenter's concern,
the FAA finds that an operator of an airplane subject to the
requirement to replace the split ring with a clevis may not be required
to do this replacement if the airplane is equipped with a release cable
instead of a release chain. Operators of airplanes equipped with a
release cable instead of a release chain may request approval of an
alternative method of compliance under the provisions of paragraph (b)
of this AD, as long as the airplane is receiving the repetitive
inspections required by AD 90-12-11 R1. Operators should note that Note
1 of this AD applies to airplanes modified, altered, or repaired in the
area subject to the requirements of this AD. Due to the fact that Note
1 already addresses this circumstance, no change to this AD is
necessary in this regard.
[[Page 38363]]
Extend Compliance Time for Certain Airplanes
One commenter requests that the FAA extend the compliance time from
18 months to 36 months for the actions required by this AD on Boeing
Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series airplanes. The commenter notes
that, as the FAA stated in the proposed rule, the 18-month compliance
time for these airplanes is based on the degree of urgency associated
with installation of a cover assembly on the trigger housing of the
inflation cylinder on the escape slides, as specified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-25-1403, dated May 4, 2000. The
commenter states that some operators have already accomplished that
service bulletin, and other airplanes are not subject to the actions in
that service bulletin because they are equipped with different escape
slides. The commenter states, for these airplanes, the compliance time
for accomplishment of the modification of the slide latch assembly
described in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1404, dated May 25, 2000,
should be 36 months.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request to extend the
compliance time. The commenter notes that, for certain airplanes as
listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1404, that service bulletin
specifies accomplishment of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-25-1403 as an integral part of the other actions in that service
bulletin. For this reason, the FAA finds that it is necessary to
mandate accomplishment of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-25-1404 within 18
months after the effective date of this AD, as proposed. However, the
FAA notes that operators of airplanes on which Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-25-1403 has been accomplished may request approval
of an alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance
time under the provisions of paragraph (b) of this AD. No change to the
final rule is necessary in this regard.
Allow Use of Solid Spring Pin
The modification of the escape slide latch assembly for all
airplanes subject to this AD involves replacement of existing spring
pins with new spring pins made from corrosion-resistant material. One
commenter requests that the FAA approve the use of a new, solid spring
pin with both ends staked as an alternative to the spring pin of
hollow-roll design that is specified in the service bulletins. The
commenter states that the spring pin specified in the service bulletins
may allow for collection of water in the pin which could lead to
corrosion. The commenter states that a solid pin will provide the
corrosion prevention needed to ensure the integrity of the pin and
operation of the slide latch and will provide a level of safety
equivalent to that provided by the pin specified in the service
bulletins.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request to allow use
of a solid pin with staked ends. The FAA notes that the latch assembly
housing is a forged part and is made of hard, corrosion-resistant
steel. If solid spring pins are installed and staked at both ends, it
may be possible for these pins to bend or be insufficiently staked,
which could result in an unacceptable latch assembly. Therefore, the
FAA finds that the spring pins must be replaced with the new pins
specified in the applicable service bulletin. No change to the final
rule is necessary in this regard.
Require Replacement of Latch Assemblies With New Assemblies
One commenter states that the escape slide latch assemblies that
are subject to this AD should not be reworked as allowed by the
proposed rule, but, rather, should be replaced with new latch
assemblies. The commenter is concerned about modifying the existing
latches due to the critical nature of these latches.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request. The FAA does
not consider the modifications in the referenced service bulletins
technically challenging, and expects that operators should be able to
accomplish such modifications. No change to the final rule is necessary
in this regard.
Adjust Cost Impact Information
One commenter states that, because the proposed AD results from a
design defect, replacement parts for the modification of the escape
slide latch assembly should be supplied at no cost to the operators.
The commenter makes no specific request for a change to the proposed
rule. The FAA acknowledges this comment, but the FAA cannot mandate
which party should bear the cost of replacement parts. This issue must
be negotiated between the operator and the manufacturer. No change to
the final rule is necessary in this regard.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously
described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 5,759 Model 727, 737, 757-200, 757-200CB,
and 757-300 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet.
The FAA estimates that 2,906 airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD. The following table shows the estimated cost
impact for airplanes affected by this AD. ``Action 1'' is the
modification of the escape slide latch assembly, and ``Action 2'' is
the installation of a cover assembly on the trigger housing of the
inflation cylinder on the escape slide. The average labor rate is $60
per work hour. The estimated cost impact is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.- Work hours Parts cost Cost per Maximum
Models/series Action registered per airplane (estimated airplane fleet cost
airplanes (estimated) maximum) (estimated) (estimated)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
727......................... 1 955 2 $1,068 $1,188 $1,134,540
737-100, -200, -200C, -300, - 1 1,156 2 1,192 1,312 1,516,672
400, -500..................
737-600, -700, -800......... 1 277 2 1,424 1,544 427,688
737-600, -700, -800......... 2 277 4 Free 240 66,480
757-200, -200CB, -300....... 1 518 3 1,602 1,782 923,076
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include
[[Page 38364]]
incidental costs, such as the time required to gain access and close
up, planning time, or time necessitated by other administrative
actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-15-01 Boeing: Amendment 39-12335. Docket 2000-NM-159-AD.
Applicability: The following airplanes, certificated in any
category:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service bulletin
Model As listed in date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
727-100 and 727-200 series.... Boeing Service May 25, 2000.
Bulletin 727-25-
0294.
737-100, -200, -200C, -300, - Boeing Service May 25, 2000.
400, and -500 series. Bulletin 737-25-
1405.
737-600, -700, and -800 series Boeing Special May 4, 2000.
Attention
Service Bulletin
737-25-1403.
737-600, -700, and -800 series Boeing Service May 25, 2000.
Bulletin 737-25-
1404.
757-200 and -200CB series..... Boeing Service May 25, 2000.
Bulletin 757-25-
0217.
757-300 series................ Boeing Service May 25, 2000.
Bulletin 757-25-
0218.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of an escape slide to deploy or inflate
correctly, which could result in the slide being unusable during an
emergency evacuation and consequent injury to passengers or airplane
crewmembers, accomplish the following:
Modification
(a) At the schedule specified in the following table, do the
actions in the ``Do these actions'' column, per the service bulletin
specified in the ``As listed in'' column:
Table 1.--Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For model As listed in Dated Do these actions No later than
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
727-100 and 727-200 series...... Boeing Service May 25, 2000...... Modify the escape 36 months after
Bulletin 727-25- slide latch the effective
0294. assembly. date of this AD.
737-100, -200, -200C, -300, - Boeing Service May 25, 2000...... Modify the escape 36 months after
400, and -500 series. Bulletin 737-25- slide latch the effective
1405. assembly. date of this AD.
737-600, -700, and -800 series.. Boeing Special May 4, 2000....... Install a cover 18 months after
Attention Service assembly on the the effective
Bulletin 737-25- trigger housing date of this AD.
1403. of the inflation
cylinder on the
escape slides.
737-600, -700, and -800 series.. Boeing Service May 25, 2000...... Modify the escape 18 months after
Bulletin 737-25- slide latch the effective
1404. assembly. date of this AD.
757-200 and -200CB series....... Boeing Service May 25, 2000...... Modify the escape 36 months after
Bulletin 757-25- slide latch the effective
0217. assembly. date of this AD.
757-300 series.................. Boeing Service May 25, 2000...... Modify the escape 36 months after
Bulletin 757-25- slide latch the effective
0218. assembly. date of this AD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199
[[Page 38365]]
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to
operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD
can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin 727-25-0294, dated May 25, 2000; Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-25-1403, dated May 4, 2000; Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-25-1404, dated May 25, 2000; Boeing Service Bulletin
737-25-1405, dated May 25, 2000; Boeing Service Bulletin 757-25-
0217, dated May 25, 2000; and Boeing Service Bulletin 757-25-0218,
dated May 25, 2000; as applicable. This incorporation by reference
was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on August 28, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 13, 2001.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-18137 Filed 7-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.