AD 2001-14-18
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100B Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100B SUD Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200B Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200C Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200F Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400D Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400F Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747SP Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747SR Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking of the vertical beam webs and frames from body station (BS) 260 to BS 320, which could result in collapse of the nose wheel well (NWW) pressure bulkhead and subsequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the vertical beam webs and frames from BS 260 to BS 320 for fatigue cracking. Repair, if necessary. Perform repetitive inspections as specified in the AD. Revise the compliance schedule for previously inspected airplanes based on the service bulletin revision level. Extend the compliance time for certain airplanes that have undergone specific inspections within the last 1,500 flight cycles.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 100 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, or 500 flight cycles for airplanes with recent inspections as specified.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, including additional airplanes as expanded by this AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, that currently requires inspections to detect fatigue cracking of the vertical beam webs and chords of the nose wheel well (NWW) and of the inner chord and web of the fuselage frames at body station (BS) 300 and BS 320, and repair, if necessary. This amendment expands the applicability of the existing AD to include additional airplanes, and adds new requirements for repetitive inspections to detect fatigue cracking of the NWW vertical beam webs and frames from BS 260 to BS 320, and follow-on actions, if necessary, which would end the currently required inspections for airplanes subject to them. This amendment also provides terminating action for the new repetitive inspections. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the NWW vertical beam webs and frames, which could result in collapse of the NWW pressure bulkhead and subsequent rapid decompression of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38892-38896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-18015]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-276-AD; Amendment 39-12329; AD 2001-14-18]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, that
currently requires inspections to detect fatigue cracking of the
vertical beam webs and chords of the nose wheel well (NWW) and of the
inner chord and web of the fuselage frames at body station (BS) 300 and
BS 320, and repair, if necessary. This amendment expands the
applicability of the existing AD to include additional airplanes, and
adds new requirements for repetitive inspections to detect fatigue
cracking of the NWW vertical beam webs and frames from BS 260 to BS
320, and follow-on actions, if necessary, which would end the currently
required inspections for airplanes subject to them. This amendment also
provides terminating action for the new repetitive inspections. The
actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the NWW vertical beam webs and frames, which could result
in collapse of the NWW pressure bulkhead and subsequent rapid
decompression of the airplane. This action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective August 30, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 30, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane
[[Page 38893]]
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. This information
may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol
Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Kawaguchi, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-1153; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 96-26-04,
amendment 39-9867 (61 FR 69026, December 31, 1996), which is applicable
to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, was published in the
Federal Register on March 14, 2001 (66 FR 14867). The action proposed
to continue to require inspections to detect fatigue cracking of the
vertical beam webs and chords of the nose wheel well and of the inner
chord and web of the fuselage frames at body station (BS) 300 and BS
320, and repair, if necessary. The action also proposed to expand the
applicability of the existing AD to include additional airplanes, and
add new requirements for repetitive inspections to detect fatigue
cracking of the nose wheel well vertical beam webs and frames from BS
260 to BS 320, and follow-on actions, if necessary, which would end
currently required inspections for airplanes subject to them. The
action also provides terminating action for the new repetitive
inspections.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received from a single commenter.
Reference Applicable Revision Level of Service Bulletin
Table 3 of the proposed AD contains the compliance schedule for
accomplishment of the inspections in paragraph (c) of the proposed AD
for previously inspected airplanes subject to Procedure 3, 4, or 6 of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2293, Revision 8, dated July 13,
2000. The commenter requests that the FAA revise the column in Table 3
that contains the compliance time for the initial inspection of the
proposed AD. The commenter asks that the column headings specifically
identify Boeing Service Bulletin, Revision 7, dated March 13, 1997, as
the correct source for the definitions of Options 1 and 2 as specified
in those columns. The commenter believes that the FAA intended to
reference Revision 7 of the service bulletin in this case because that
is the revision being used by most operators.
The FAA partially concurs with the commenter's request. We find
that it's necessary to revise Table 3 in this final rule, but the
commenter's suggested remedy does not fully address the issue because
operators could possibly be using issues of the service bulletin other
than Revision 7. Furthermore, we have determined that the definitions
of Option 1 and Option 2 have varied between revisions of the service
bulletin. Therefore, we find it necessary to cite the original issue
and Revisions 1 through 7 of the service bulletin, as well as to remove
the references to Options 1 and 2 entirely, and instead specify the
method of inspections included in those options. Table 3 of this final
rule has been revised accordingly.
Extend Compliance Time for Paragraph (f)
The commenter requests that the FAA extend the compliance time in
paragraph (f) of the proposed AD for airplanes on which cracking was
repaired prior to the effective date of this AD according to paragraph
(a)(2) of the proposed AD. The commenter states that, if these
airplanes have not been inspected per paragraph (a) of the proposed AD
within the last 100 flight cycles before the effective date of this AD,
the airplanes must be inspected per paragraph (c) of the proposed AD
within 100 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD. The
commenter states that if these same airplanes had not been repaired per
paragraph (a)(2) of the proposed AD, they would have been allowed to
wait until 500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD to do
the inspections in paragraph (c). The commenter states that its
experience in the subject area shows that repairs per paragraph (a)(2)
of the proposed AD should be significantly larger and stronger than
published repairs per the Boeing 747 Structural Repair Manual, which
should eliminate the need for these airplanes to be inspected within
100 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD.
The FAA concurs with the intent of the commenter's request, though
not with its rationale. We do not concur that an airplane not repaired
per paragraph (a)(2) of this AD would have a compliance time of 500
flight cycles after the effective date of this AD. An unrepaired
airplane would be subject to a compliance time of 100 or 500 flight
cycles SINCE LAST INSPECTION (not since the effective date of this AD),
depending on the method used for the last inspection.
As explained in the preamble of the proposed AD, we intend
paragraph (f) to apply to airplanes that may not have been inspected
following repairs. Certain airplanes could have been repaired as early
as 1997, with no inspections having been accomplished since that time.
The compliance time of 100 flight cycles after the effective date of
this AD in paragraph (f) of this AD ensures that all of these airplanes
will be inspected promptly.
However, the FAA does concur that paragraph (f) of the proposed AD
could require certain airplanes--i.e., those inspected by internal
detailed visual inspection and high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection, which allows a 1,500-flight-cycle repeat interval--to be
inspected unnecessarily within 100 flight cycles after the effective
date of this AD. Therefore, the FAA has revised paragraph (f) of this
final rule to provide an extended compliance time of 500 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD for airplanes on which an internal
detailed visual and HFEC inspection has been done according to Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53-2293 within the last 1,500 flight cycles before
the effective date of this AD.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously
described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 562 Model 747 series airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 179
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
For affected airplanes, the inspections that are currently required
by AD 96-26-04 take approximately 24 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
FAA estimates the cost impact of the currently required actions to be
$1,440 per affected airplane, per inspection cycle.
[[Page 38894]]
The new inspections that are required in this AD will take
approximately 4 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the FAA
estimates the cost impact of these new actions on U.S. operators to be
$42,960, or $240 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-9867 (61 FR
69026, December 31, 1996), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), amendment 39-12329, to read as follows:
2001-14-18 Boeing: Amendment 39-12329. Docket 2000-NM-276-AD.
Supersedes AD 96-26-04, Amendment 39-9867.
Applicability: Model 747 series airplanes, line numbers 1
through 685 inclusive, certificated in any category; except as
excluded in the table below:
Airplanes Excluded From Applicability of This AD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane group (as listed in Boeing Area 4 modified per
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2293, Boeing Service Bulletin Zone 1 modified per Excepted from this AD?
Revision 8, dated July 13, 2000) (BSB) 747-53-2293? BSB 747-53-2272?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1-11................................ Yes.................... Yes................... Yes.
1-11................................ No..................... Yes................... No.
1-11................................ Yes.................... No.................... No.
12-13............................... Yes.................... N/A................... Yes.
12-13............................... No..................... N/A................... No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (i)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking of nose wheel well (NWW)
vertical beams and frames, which could result in collapse of the NWW
pressure bulkhead and subsequent rapid decompression of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Restatement of Requirements of AD 96-26-04
Repetitive Inspections of Frame Inner Chord and Web and Repair
(a) For airplanes with line numbers 1 through 678 inclusive on
which the Section 41 frame replacement in zone 1 specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53-2272 has not been accomplished: Prior to the
accumulation of 10,000 total flight cycles, or within 50 flight
cycles after January 6, 1997 (the effective date of AD 96-26-04,
amendment 39-9867), whichever occurs later, perform a detailed
visual inspection to detect fatigue cracking of the inner chord and
web of the left side and right side of body station (BS) 300 and BS
320 fuselage frames from the NWW side panel outboard to stringer 39,
in accordance with normal maintenance practices. Pay particular
attention to the area where the NWW vertical beam inner chord
interfaces with the fuselage frame.
(1) If no cracking is detected, repeat the detailed visual
inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 flight cycles,
until paragraph (c) of this AD is done.
(2) If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair
in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this paragraph,
the Manager's approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
One-Time Inspection of Vertical Beam Webs and Chords and Repair
(b) For airplanes with line numbers 1 through 678 inclusive on
which the Section 41 frame replacement in zone 1 specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53-2272 has not been accomplished: Prior to the
accumulation of 10,000 total flight cycles, or within 50 flight
cycles after January 6, 1997, whichever occurs later, perform a one-
time detailed visual inspection to detect fatigue cracking of the
left and right side vertical beam webs and chords of the NWW at BS
300 and BS 320, in accordance with normal maintenance procedures.
(1) If no cracking is detected, no further action is required by
this paragraph.
(2) If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair
in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle
[[Page 38895]]
ACO. For a repair method to be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO,
as required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
New Requirements of this AD
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Repetitive Inspections
(c) Do inspections to detect fatigue cracking of NWW vertical
beam webs and frames, as applicable, from BS 260 to BS 320 (``Area
4''), per the applicable procedure shown in Table 1 of this AD and
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2293, Revision 8, dated July 13, 2000. For affected
airplanes, inspection per this paragraph ends the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (a). Table 1 follows:
Table 1.--Determining the Applicable Procedure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 4 inspected
per the original
issue or Area 4 modified Zone 1 modified Applicable procedure
Airplane group revisions 1 per BSB 747-53- per BSB 747-53- and figures in service
through 7 of BSB 2293? 2272? bulletin
747-53-2293?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1-11........................... No............... No............... No............... Procedure 1; Figures 4
and 19, and Figure
10; as applicable.
1-11........................... No............... No............... Yes.............. Procedure 2; Figures
11 and 12.
1-11........................... Yes.............. No............... No............... Procedure 3; Figures 4
and 13, and Figures
10 and 14; as
applicable.
1-11........................... Yes.............. No............... Yes.............. Procedure 4; Figures
11 and 15.
1-11........................... No............... Yes.............. No............... Procedure 5; Figures
10, 16, and 17; as
applicable.
1-11........................... Yes.............. Yes.............. No............... Procedure 6; Figure
18; and Figure 10, 14
or 17; as applicable.
12-13.......................... No............... No............... N/A.............. Procedure 2; Figures
11 and 12.
12-13.......................... Yes.............. No............... N/A.............. Procedure 4; Figures
11 and 15.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive Inspections: Compliance Schedule
(d) For all airplanes, do the inspection in paragraph (c) of
this AD per the schedule in Table 2 or Table 3 of this AD, as
applicable, except as provided by paragraph (f) of this AD.
Thereafter, repeat the inspection at the interval specified in Table
2 or Table 3 of this AD, as applicable, until paragraph (h) of this
AD is done. Tables 2 and 3 follow:
Table 2.--Compliance Schedule--Procedures 1, 2, and 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repeat the inspection in the service bulletin as
follows:
Do the initial -----------------------------------------------------
For airplanes subject to inspection before the If most recent
latest of inspection was per If most recent inspection was
option 1, repeat at per option 2, repeat at least
least every every
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procedure 1.................... 10,000 total flight 1,500 flight cycles. 100 flight cycles.
cycles or 100 flight
cycles after the last
inspection per paragraph
(a) of this AD.
Procedure 2.................... 10,000 total flight 1,500 flight cycles. 500 flight cycles.
cycles or 1,500 500
flight cycles after the
effective date of this
AD.
Procedure 5.................... 10,000 total flight 1,500 flight cycles. 100 flight cycles.
cycles or 500 flight
cycles since
modification of Area 4
in accordance with BSB
747-53-2293 or 100
flight cycles after the
effective date of this
AD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3.--Compliance Schedule--Procedures 3, 4, and 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do the initial inspection as follows, as Repeat the inspection in the service
applicable: bulletin as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If most recent
inspection used
both detailed If most recent
visual and high inspection used
For airplanes subject to frequency eddy only the detailed If most recent If most recent
current (HFEC) visual method, per inspection was per inspection was per
methods, per the the original issue Option 1, repeat Option 2, repeat
original issue or or Revisions 1 at least every at least every
Revisions 1 through through 7 of BSB
7 of BSB 747-53- 747-53-2293, do the
2293, do the inspection:
inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procedure 3................... Within 500 flight Within 100 flight 1,500 flight 100 flight cycles.
cycles since last cycles since last cycles.
inspection. inspection.
Procedure 4................... Within 500 flight Within 100 flight 1,500 flight 500 flight cycles.
cycles since last cycles since last cycles.
inspection. inspection.
Procedure 6................... Within 500 flight Within 100 flight 1,500 flight 100 flight cycles.
cycles since last cycles since last cycles.
inspection. inspection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 38896]]
Exceptions to Inspections Per Paragraphs (a) and (b)
(e) For airplanes subject to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD:
Airplanes inspected per paragraph (c) of this AD within the
compliance time specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD are
not required to be inspected per paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD.
(f) For airplanes in Groups 1 through 11 on which cracking was
repaired prior to the effective date of this AD per paragraph (a)(2)
of this AD: If an inspection per paragraph (a) has not been done
within the last 100 flight cycles before the effective date of this
AD, do the inspection in paragraph (c) of this AD at the compliance
time specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) If internal detailed visual and HFEC inspections according
to BSB 747-53-2293 have been done within the last 1,500 flight
cycles before the effective date of this AD: Do the inspection
within 500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD.
(2) For airplanes not identified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD:
Do the inspection within 100 flight cycles after the effective date
of this AD.
Corrective Actions
(g) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (c) or (d) of this AD, prior to further flight, perform
corrective actions, including secondary inspections to detect
further cracking, in accordance with the applicable procedure in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2293, Revision 8, dated July 13, 2000.
Optional Terminating Action
(h) Replacement of vertical beams and frames, as applicable, in
accordance with the applicable procedure in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2293, Revision
8, dated July 13, 2000, ends the requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(i)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in
accordance with AD 96-26-04, amendment 39-9867, are approved as
alternative methods of compliance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this AD.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(j) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(k) Except as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD,
the actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2293, Revision 8, dated July 13, 2000. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(l) This amendment becomes effective on August 30, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 12, 2001.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-18015 Filed 7-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.