AD 2000-22-20
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-11 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-12 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-13 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-14 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-15 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-15F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-21 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-31 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32 (VC-9C) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32F (C-9A) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32F (C-9B) | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-33F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-34 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-34F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-41 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-51 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due to fatigue cracking, which could result in a deflected flap causing asymmetric lift and reduced controllability and structural integrity of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Measure the diameter of the hole counterbore of the outboard idler hinge fitting of the left and right wing flap. Perform repetitive high frequency eddy current inspections (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge fitting, if necessary. Replace the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like part if any crack is detected.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD or before the accumulation of 24,000 total landings, whichever occurs later.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, dated September 20, 2000; certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes. This action requires, among other actions, measuring the diameter of the hole counterbore of the outboard idler hinge fitting of the left and right wing flap; performing repetitive high frequency eddy current inspections (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge fitting, if necessary; and replacing the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like part, if any crack is detected. This action is necessary to prevent failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due to fatigue cracking, which could result in a deflected flap that may cause an asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and structural integrity of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68067-68069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-28480]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-344-AD; Amendment 39-11968; AD 2000-22-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20,
-9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30,
-9-40, and -9-50 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes. This
action requires, among other actions, measuring the diameter of the
hole counterbore of the outboard idler hinge fitting of the left and
right wing flap; performing repetitive high frequency eddy current
inspections (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge fitting, if
necessary; and replacing the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like
part, if any crack is detected. This action is necessary to prevent
failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due to fatigue
cracking, which could result in a deflected flap that may cause an
asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and structural
integrity of the airplane. This action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective November 29, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of November 29, 2000.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before January 16, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-344-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9d0c4888784c480889b8a8684848c879da98f8888c78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bd8490dcd3d090d4dccfded2d0d0d8d3c9fddbdcdc93dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must
contain ``Docket No. 2000-NM-344-AD'' in the subject line and need not
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or
ASCII text.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Boeing
Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical
Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). This
information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California; or at
[[Page 68068]]
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wahib Mina, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone
(562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has received reports of a failed or
cracked flap idler hinge fitting at the lower outboard stud location on
certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9 series airplanes. Investigation
revealed that these discrepancies were caused by fatigue cracking
initiating at the lower outboard mounting hole with a 1\1/8\-inch
diameter counterbore. Such fatigue cracking, if not corrected, could
result in failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting. A failed
outboard flap idler hinge fitting could result in a deflected flap,
which may cause an asymmetric lift and consequent reduced
controllability and structural integrity of the airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC9-57A218, including Appendix, dated September 20, 2000, which
describes the following procedures:
1. Measuring the diameter of the hole counterbore of the outboard
idler hinge fitting of the left and right wing flap;
2. Installing a new nut, plain washer, and PLI washer;
3. For certain cases, performing repetitive high frequency eddy
current inspections (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge
fitting; and
4. Replacing the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like part, if
any crack is detected.
Accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletin is
intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition.
Explanation of the Requirements of the Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-
30, -9-40, and -9-50 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes
series airplanes of the same type design, this AD is being issued to
prevent failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due to fatigue
cracking, which could result in a deflected flap that may cause an
asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and structural
integrity of the airplane. This AD requires accomplishment of the
actions specified in the service bulletin described previously.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Submit comments using the following format:
<bullet> Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
<bullet> For each issue, state what specific change to the AD is
being requested.
<bullet> Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each
request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2000-NM-344-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped
and returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-22-20 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-11968. Docket 2000-NM-
344-AD.
Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50
series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes, as listed in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, dated September 20, 2000;
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability
[[Page 68069]]
provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or
repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For
airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the
performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request
should include an assessment of the effect of the modification,
alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD;
and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request
should include specific proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due
to fatigue cracking, which could result in a deflected flap that may
cause an asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and
structural integrity of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Measurement
(a) Before the accumulation of 24,000 total landings, or within
90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
measure the diameter of the hole counterbore of the outboard idler
hinge fitting of the left and right wing flap, per Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, including Appendix, dated September 20,
2000.
Acceptable Measurement of 0.875 (\7/8\) Inch: Installation of Certain
Parts
(1) If the diameter of any hole counterbore is 0.875 (\7/8\)
inch, before further flight, install a new nut, plain washer, and
PLI washer, per the service bulletin.
Unacceptable Measurement of 1.125 (1\1/8\) Inches: Repetitive
Inspections and Corrective Actions, If Necessary
(2) If the diameter of any hole counterbore is 1.125 (1\1/8\)
inches, before further flight, do a high frequency eddy current
inspection (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge fitting,
per the service bulletin.
(i) Condition 1. If no crack is detected, before further flight,
install a new nut, plain washer, and PLI washer, per the service
bulletin. Repeat the HFEC inspection every 1,000 landings until the
replacement specified in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) has been done.
(ii) Condition 2. If any crack is detected, before further
flight, replace the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like part,
per the service bulletin. Within 24,000 landings after
accomplishment of the replacement, do the HFEC inspection required
by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, including Appendix, dated September 20,
2000. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director
of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft
Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach,
California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business
Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on November 29, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 1, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-28480 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.