AD 2000-22-15
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200B Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200C Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200F Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Chafing between certain engine thrust control cables and cable penetration holes, which could lead to cable failure and a severe asymmetric thrust condition during landing, reducing controllability.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the clearance between engine thrust control cables and cable penetration holes; measure the clearance; perform additional inspection for cable wear if insufficient clearance is found; replace the cable if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 series airplanes delivered in or modified into the stretched upper deck configuration.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 series airplanes delivered in or modified into the stretched upper deck configuration. This action requires a one-time inspection to detect chafing between certain engine thrust control cables and certain cable penetration holes, and follow-on actions, if necessary. This action is necessary to prevent chafing and failure of engine thrust control cables, which could result in a severe asymmetric thrust condition during landing, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66607-66611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-28233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-136-AD; Amendment 39-11962; AD 2000-22-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -
200F, and -300 Series Airplanes Delivered In or Modified Into the
Stretched Upper Deck Configuration
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and
-300 series airplanes delivered in or modified into the stretched upper
deck configuration. This action requires a one-time inspection to
detect chafing between certain engine thrust control cables and certain
cable penetration holes, and follow-on actions, if necessary. This
action is necessary to prevent chafing and failure of engine thrust
control cables, which could result in a severe asymmetric thrust
condition during landing, and consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Effective November 22, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations was approved previously by the Director of the Federal
Register as of April 24, 2000 (65 FR 14838, March 20, 2000).
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before January 8, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-136-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85bca8e4ebe8a8ece4f7e6eae8e8e0ebf1c5e3e4e4abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1889cd0dfdc9cd8d0c3d2dedcdcd4dfc5f1d7d0d09fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must
contain ``Docket No. 2000-NM-136-AD'' in the subject line and need not
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or
ASCII text.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dionne Krebs, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone
(425) 227-2250; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 10, 2000, the FAA issued AD 2000-
05-30, amendment 39-11640 (65 FR 14838, March 20, 2000), applicable to
certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, to require repetitive
inspections to detect discrepancies of the cables, fittings, and
pulleys of the engine thrust control cable installation; replacement,
if necessary; and, for certain airplanes, certain preventative actions
on the engine thrust control cable installation. That action was
prompted by reports of failure of engine thrust control cables. The
requirements of that AD are intended to prevent such failures, which
could result in a severe asymmetric thrust condition during landing,
and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
Paragraph (g) of AD 2000-05-30 requires, for certain Model 747-100B
series airplanes with a stretched upper deck (SUD), a detailed visual
inspection and measurement of the clearance between certain engine
thrust control cables and the cable penetration holes, and follow-on
corrective actions, if necessary. Since the issuance of AD 2000-05-30,
the FAA has determined that certain other Model 747 series airplanes
delivered with or modified to have a SUD are subject to the same unsafe
condition as the Model 747-100B SUD airplanes identified in paragraph
(g) of the existing AD. Therefore, the FAA finds that further
rulemaking is necessary to prevent chafing and failure of engine thrust
control cables, which could result in a severe asymmetric thrust
condition during landing, and consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane, on all affected airplanes.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has previously reviewed and approved Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53-2327, Revision 2, dated September 24, 1998. That
service bulletin describes procedures for repetitive inspections of
certain upper deck floor beams to detect cracking, and repair of any
cracks found or reinforcement of those floor beams. The service
bulletin also describes procedures for a detailed inspection and
measurement of the clearance between the engine thrust control cables
and the cable penetration holes in that area, and modification of the
holes or replacement of the plate, if necessary.
Explanation of Requirements of the Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design, this AD is
being issued to prevent chafing and failure of engine thrust control
cables, which could result in a severe asymmetric thrust condition
during landing, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
This AD requires accomplishment of the actions specified in the service
bulletin described previously, except as discussed below.
Differences Between This AD and Relevant Service Bulletin
Operators should note that, although Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
53-2327 describes procedures for inspection of certain upper deck floor
beams, and repair of any cracks found or reinforcement of those floor
beams, as applicable, this AD requires only the detailed visual
inspection and measurement of the clearance between the engine thrust
control cables and the cable penetration holes in that area. The
inspection, repair, and reinforcement of certain upper deck floor beams
are mandated by AD 92-24-07, amendment 39-8412 (57 FR 53436, November
10, 1992). The detailed visual inspection and measurement of the
clearance between the engine thrust control cables and the cable
penetration holes was incorporated into the service bulletin after AD
92-24-07 was issued. Therefore, the FAA is requiring that part of the
service bulletin in this AD. In addition, for airplanes on which
insufficient clearance is measured, this AD adds an additional
inspection of the
[[Page 66608]]
cable for wear in that area using procedures referenced in Appendix 1
(including Figure 1) of this AD and would require replacement of the
cable, if necessary.
Operators also should note that the effectivity listing of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53-2327, Revision 2, includes Boeing Model 747-400
series airplanes. However, the actions required by this AD are not
applicable to Model 747-400 series airplanes, so those airplanes are
not included in the applicability of this AD.
Cost Impact
None of the airplanes affected by this action are on the U.S.
Register. All airplanes included in the applicability of this rule
currently are operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign registry;
therefore, they are not directly affected by this AD action. However,
the FAA considers that this rule is necessary to ensure that the unsafe
condition is addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes
are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S.
Register in the future, it would require approximately 1 work hour to
accomplish the required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD would be
$60 per airplane.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since this AD action does not affect any airplane that is currently
on the U.S. register, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no
additional burden on any person. Therefore, prior notice and public
procedures hereon are unnecessary and the amendment may be made
effective in less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not
preceded by notice and opportunity for public comment, comments are
invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this
rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may
desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be
submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption
ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date
for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light
of the comments received. Factual information that supports the
commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating
the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional
rulemaking action would be needed.
Submit comments using the following format:
<bullet> Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
<bullet> For each issue, state what specific change to the AD is
being requested.
<bullet> Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each
request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2000-NM-136-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped
and returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-22-15 Boeing: Amendment 39-11962. Docket 2000-NM-136-AD.
Applicability: Model 747-100, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300
series airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with Pratt
& Whitney Model JT9D-3 or -7 series engines, General Electric Model
CF6-45 or -50 series engines, or Rolls-Royce Model RB211-524B, C, or
D series engines; delivered in or modified into the stretched upper
deck (SUD) configuration; and having angle assemblies with Boeing
part numbers 015U0454-63 and 015U0454-64 installed at body station
970.
Note 1: Model 747-100 SUD series airplanes on which paragraph
(g) of AD 2000-05-30 has been accomplished are not required to
comply with this AD.
Note 2: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent chafing and failure of engine thrust control cables,
which could result in a severe asymmetric thrust condition during
landing, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane,
accomplish the following:
[[Page 66609]]
Inspection/Modification/Replacement
(a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a detailed visual inspection and measure the clearance
between the engine thrust control cables and the cable penetration
holes, in accordance with the Cable Chafing Inspection of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53-2327,
Revision 2, dated September 24, 1998. If insufficient clearance
exists, as specified in the service bulletin, prior to further
flight, accomplish paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD.
(1) Modify the cable penetration holes or replace the plate, as
applicable, in accordance with Figure 7 of the service bulletin.
(2) Perform a detailed visual inspection of the engine thrust
control cables in the area of the plate to detect wear and broken
wires in accordance with Appendix 1 (including Figure 1) of this AD.
If any wear is within the criteria contained in Appendix 1
(including Figure 1) of this AD, no further action is required by
this paragraph. If any wear outside the criteria contained in
Appendix 1 (including Figure 1) of this AD is found, prior to
further flight, replace the cable with a new cable, in accordance
with the procedures described in the Boeing 747 Maintenance Manual.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) Except as provided by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD, the
actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53-2327, Revision 2, dated September 24, 1998. This
incorporation by reference was approved previously by the Director
of the Federal Register as of April 24, 2000 (65 FR 14838, March 20,
2000). Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on November 22, 2000.
APPENDIX 1--THRUST CONTROL CABLE INSPECTION PROCEDURE
1. Detailed Visual Inspection To Detect Wear
A. Perform a detailed visual inspection of the engine thrust control
cables in the area of the plate to detect wear.
B. Replace the cable assembly if any of the following criteria are
met:
(1) One cable strand had worn wires where one wire cross section
is decreased by more than 40 percent (see Figure 1).
(2) A kink is found.
(3) Corrosion is found.
2. Inspection To Detect Broken Wires
A. To check for broken wires, rub a cloth along the length of the
cable. The cloth catches on broken wires.
B. Replace the cable assembly if any of the following criteria are
met.
(1) Replace the 7x7 cable assembly if there are two or more
broken wires in 12 continuous inches of cable or there are three or
more broken wires anywhere in the total cable assembly.
(2) Replace the 7x19 cable assembly if there are four or more
broken wires in 12 continuous inches of cable or there are six or
more broken wires anywhere in the total cable assembly.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 66610]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR07NO00.027
[[Page 66611]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 30, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-28233 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.