AD 2000-20-12
Unsafe Condition
The tail-fuselage attachment fitting may be damaged or have inadequate material characteristics, which could fail and result in loss of controlled flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the tail-fuselage attachment fitting, part number A 102 021N, for damage and material hardness. Replace the fitting if damaged or if the material does not meet hardness requirements. Do not install a P/N A 102 021N attachment fitting that has not passed the inspection requirements.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the next 60 days after November 27, 2000, for the initial inspection. Before further flight after the inspection, for any required replacement.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Aerotechnik s.r.o. Model L 13 SEH VIVAT sailplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Aerotechnik s.r.o. (Aerotechnik) Model L 13 SEH VIVAT sailplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the tail-fuselage hinge for strength requirements and damage, and also requires you to replace any hinge with damage or that does not meet strength requirements. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for the Czech Republic. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct any tail-fuselage hinge that is damaged or has inadequate material characteristics. Any tail-fuselage hinge with damage or inadequate material characteristics could fail and result in loss of controlled flight.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61262-61264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-25553]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-CE-01-AD; Amendment 39-11923; AD 2000-20-12]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aerotechnik s.r.o. Model L 13 SEH VIVAT
Sailplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to all Aerotechnik s.r.o. (Aerotechnik) Model L 13 SEH VIVAT
sailplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the tail-fuselage hinge for
strength requirements and damage, and also requires you to replace any
hinge with damage or that does not meet strength requirements. This AD
is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the airworthiness authority for the Czech Republic. The
actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct any
tail-fuselage hinge that is damaged or has inadequate material
characteristics. Any tail-fuselage hinge with damage or inadequate
material characteristics could fail and result in loss of controlled
flight.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on November 27, 2000.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of
November 27, 2000.
ADDRESSES: You may get the service information referenced in this AD
from Aerotechnik s.r.o., 686 04 Kunovic, Czech Republic; telephone:
+420 632 537 111; facsimile: +420 632 537 900. You may examine this
information at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No.
2000-CE-01-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City,
[[Page 61263]]
Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC 20001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4144; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What events have caused this AD? The Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for the Czech Republic,
recently notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on all
Aerotechnik Model L 13 SEH VIVAT sailplanes. The CAA reports an
incident involving one of the affected sailplanes where the tail-
fuselage attachment fitting was damaged. Further analysis reveals that
the material characteristics of the tail-fuselage attachment fitting
were inadequate.
What are the consequences if the condition is not corrected? The
tail-fuselage attachment fitting is a primary structural element within
the empennage. Failure of this part, if not detected and corrected,
could result in loss of controlled flight.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to
amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to all Aerotechnik Model L 13 SEH VIVAT
sailplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on August 9, 2000 (65 FR 48646).
The NPRM proposed to require you to inspect the tail-fuselage hinge for
strength requirements and damage, and would require you to replace any
hinge with damage or that does not meet strength requirements.
Was the public invited to comment? Interested persons were afforded
an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No
comments were received on the proposed rule or the FAA's determination
of the cost to the public.
The FAA's Determination
What is FAA's Final Determination on this Issue? After careful
review of all available information related to the subject presented
above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for minor editorial
corrections. We determined that these minor corrections:
<bullet> Will not change the meaning of the AD; and
<bullet> Will not add any additional burden upon the public than
was already proposed.
Cost Impact
How many sailplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD
affects 20 sailplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of the inspection for the affected
sailplanes on the U.S. Register? We estimate that it will take
approximately 4 workhours per sailplane to accomplish the inspection,
at an average labor rate of $60 an hour. Based on the cost factors
presented above, we estimate the total cost impact of the inspection on
U.S. operators to be $4,800, or $240 per sailplane.
What is the cost impact of the replacement for the affected
sailplanes on the U.S. Register? We estimate that it will take
approximately 16 workhours per sailplane to accomplish the replacement
(as necessary), at an average labor rate of $60 an hour. The
manufacturer will provide the replacement attachment fittings at no
cost. Based on the cost factors presented above, we estimate the total
labor cost impact of the replacement on U.S. operators to be $960 per
sailplane.
Regulatory Impact
Does this AD impact various entities? The regulations adopted
herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not
have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For
the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy
of the final evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
Reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends Section 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2000-20-12 Aerotechnik S.R.O.: Amendment 39-11923; Docket No. 2000-
CE-01-AD.
(a) What sailplanes are affected by this AD? This AD applies to
Model L 13 SEH VIVAT sailplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in
any category.
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate
any of the above sailplanes on the U.S. Register must comply with
this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by
this AD are intended to prevent the tail-fuselage hinge failing and
consequent loss of controlled flight.
(d) What must I do to address this problem? To address this
problem, you must accomplish the following actions:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance times Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the tail-fuselage Within the next 60 Follow the
attachment fitting, part number days after procedures in the
(P/N) A 102 021N, for damage November 27, 2000 Aerotechnik
and material hardness. (the effective Service Bulletin
date of this AD). SEH 13-005a,
dated November
18, 1999.
(2) If the tail-fuselage Before further You must notify
attachment fitting is damaged flight after the Aerotechnik and
or the material does not meet inspection. request they send
the hardness requirements the replacement
specified in the service part with
bulletin, you must replace the installation
tail-fuselage attachment instructions.
fitting.
[[Page 61264]]
(3) Do not install, on any As of November 27, Inspect any
sailplane, a P/N A 102 021N 2000 (the attachment
attachment fitting that has not effective date of fitting in
passed the inspection this AD. accordance with
requirements specified in the previously
paragraph (d)(1) of this AD. referenced
service bulletin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way? You may use an
alternative method of compliance or adjust the compliance time if:
(1) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent
level of safety; and
(2) The Manager, Small Airplane Directorate approves your
alternative. Submit your request through an FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106.
Note 1: This AD applies to each sailplane identified in
paragraph (a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For sailplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe
condition, specific actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already-approved
alternative methods of compliance? Contact Mike Kiesov, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4144; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
(g) What if I need to fly the sailplane to another location to
comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your sailplane to a location where
you can accomplish the requirements of this AD.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accordance
with Aerotechnik CZ Service Bulletin SEH 13-005a, dated November 18,
1999. The Director of the Federal Register approved this
incorporation by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
You can get copies from Aerotechnikcz s.r.o., 686 04 Kunovic, Czech
Republic; telephone: +420 632 537 111; facsimile: +420 632 537 900.
You can look at copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the
Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri, or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC 20001.
(i) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment
becomes effective on November 27, 2000.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in Czech Republic AD
Number CAA-AD-T-112/1999, dated November 18, 1999.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 28, 2000.
Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 00-25553 Filed 10-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.