AD 2000-14-07

Recurring final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes

AD Number
2000-14-07
Status
final_rule
Effective Date
Product Category
aircraft
Docket
Docket No. 99-NM-75-AD
FR Citation
65 FR 43228
Technical illustration of an aircraft electrical generator and wiring assembly
Problem area Electrical system

Applicability

TypeManufacturerModelDetails
aircraft The Boeing Company 727-100 Series (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes
aircraft The Boeing Company 727-100C Series (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes
aircraft The Boeing Company 727-200 Series (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes
aircraft The Boeing Company 727-200F Series (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes
aircraft The Boeing Company 727 Series (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes
aircraft The Boeing Company 727C Series (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes

Unsafe Condition

Cracking of the rear spar web, which could permit fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an electrical short that could cause a fire.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Required Actions

Accomplish inspections to detect cracking of the rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section, using either a visual inspection with a borescope or mirror, or an ultrasonic and high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection. Repair any detected cracking or fuel leakage prior to further flight, in accordance with the specified service bulletins.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Compliance Time

Within 300 flight cycles after December 27, 1997, or prior to the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, whichever occurs later.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Affected Aircraft

Boeing Model 727 series airplanes with line numbers 858 through 864, 867 through 869, 872 through 883, and 885 through 1832, certificated in any category.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Federal Register Abstract

This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section, and repair, if necessary. That action also provides for an optional modification of the rear spar web that constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment requires accomplishment of the previously optional terminating action. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent cracking of the rear spar web, which could permit fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an electrical short that could cause a fire.

Document Text

Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 135 (Thursday, July 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43228-43230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-17296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 99-NM-75-AD; Amendment 39-11816; AD 2000-14-07]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
(AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes, that 
currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the 
rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section, and repair, 
if necessary. That action also provides for an optional modification of 
the rear spar web that constitutes terminating action for the 
repetitive inspections. This amendment requires accomplishment of the 
previously optional terminating action. The actions specified by this 
AD are intended to prevent cracking of the rear spar web, which could 
permit fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an 
electrical short that could cause a fire.

DATES: Effective August 17, 2000.
    The incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin 727-
57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999, as listed in the 
regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of 
August 17, 2000.
    The incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
727-57A0182, dated September 18, 1997, as listed in the regulations, 
was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of 
December 29, 1997 (62 FR 65355, December 12, 1997).

ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal 
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Sippel, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle 
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2774; fax (425) 227-1181.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 97-25-15, 
amendment 39-10239 (62 FR 65355, December 12, 1997), which is 
applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes, was published 
in the Federal Register on October 6, 1999 (64 FR 54246). The action 
proposed to require repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the 
rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section; repair, if 
necessary; and modification of the rear spar web, which would 
constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections.

Comments

    Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
the comments received.

Support for the Proposal

    One commenter supports the proposed rule.

Request To State Grace Period in Calendar Time

    One commenter requests that the FAA revise the grace period in the 
proposed rule from 3,000 flight cycles to 4 years after the effective 
date of this AD. The commenter notes that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
727-57A0182 is listed in Boeing Document D6-54860, dated March 31, 
1989, which is currently required by AD 90-06-09, amendment 39-6488 (55 
FR 8370, March 7, 1990) and AD 94-05-04, amendment 39-8842 (59 FR 
13442, March 22, 1994). The commenter states that these AD's currently 
state a compliance threshold of 60,000 total flight cycles, with a 
grace period of 4 years after the effective date of the AD. The 
commenter requests that the proposed rule allow the same grace period 
allowed by the existing AD's for the actions specified in Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 727-57A0182.
    The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request. Boeing 
Document D6-54860 addresses service problems related to both corrosion 
(which is a function of time) and fatigue (which is a function of 
flight cycles). Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182 is 
listed in that document, this AD is a standalone AD concerned with 
fatigue cracking of the rear spar web, which is related to flight 
cycles. As a result, the FAA has determined that a grace period stated 
in flight cycles is more appropriate than one stated in calendar time. 
No change to the final rule is necessary in this regard.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact

    There are approximately 970 Model 727 series airplanes of the 
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 659 
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD: 641 ``Group 1'' 
airplanes and 18 ``Group 2'' airplanes, as listed in the service 
bulletin.
    The inspection that is currently required by AD 97-25-15 takes 
approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost 
impact of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated 
to be $79,080, or $120 per airplane, per inspection cycle.

[[Page 43229]]

    The new modification that is required in this AD action takes 
approximately 60 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts cost approximately 
$6,434 per airplane for ``Group 1'' airplanes, and $6,689 per airplane 
for ``Group 2'' airplanes. Based on these figures, the cost impact of 
the new modification required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated 
to be $6,616,996, or $10,034 per ``Group 1'' airplane and $10,289 per 
``Group 2'' airplane.
    The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory Impact

    The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-10239 (62 FR 
65355, December 29, 1997), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
(AD), amendment 39-11816, to read as follows:

2000-14-07 Boeing: Amendment 39-11816. Docket 99-NM-75-AD. 
Supersedes AD 97-25-15, Amendment 39-10239.

    Applicability: Model 727 series airplanes having line numbers 
858 through 864 inclusive, 867 through 869 inclusive, 872 through 
883 inclusive, and 885 through 1832 inclusive; certificated in any 
category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e)(1) 
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect 
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To prevent cracking of the rear spar web, which could permit 
fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an 
electrical short that could cause a fire, accomplish the following:

Restatement of the Requirements of AD 97-25-15

Inspections

    (a) Prior to the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or 
within 300 flight cycles after December 27, 1997 (the effective date 
of AD 97-25-15, amendment 39-10239), whichever occurs later: 
Accomplish the inspections specified in either paragraph (a)(1) or 
(a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
727-57A0182, dated September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin 
727-57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999. For purposes of 
the AD, the access panels specified in the alert service bulletin 
need not be removed; the access panels need only be opened.

    Note 2: The fuel tank of the wing center section may be filled 
with fuel to assist in detecting cracking or fuel leakage during the 
accomplishment of the visual inspections required by this AD.

    (1) Perform a visual inspection using a borescope or mirror to 
detect cracking of the rear spar web and/or fuel leakage of the wing 
center section between right body buttock line (BBL) 40 and left BBL 
40, in accordance with Part I of the Accomplishment Instructions of 
the service bulletin. Thereafter, repeat this inspection at 
intervals not to exceed 300 flight cycles. Or
    (2) Perform an ultrasonic and high frequency eddy current (HFEC) 
inspection to detect cracking of the rear spar web of the wing 
center section between right BBL 40 and left BBL 40, in accordance 
with Part II of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service 
bulletin. Thereafter, repeat this inspection at intervals not to 
exceed 3,000 flight cycles.

Repair

    (b) If any cracking of the rear spar web and/or fuel leakage of 
the wing center section is detected between right BBL 40 and left 
BBL 40 near the upper machined land radius, prior to further flight, 
repair in accordance with Part III of the Accomplishment 
Instructions in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated 
September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, Revision 
1, dated February 25, 1999. Accomplishment of this repair 
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
requirements of this AD.
    (c) If any cracking of the rear spar web and/or fuel leakage of 
the wing center section is detected that is outside the area 
specified in paragraph (b) of this AD, prior to further flight, 
repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle 
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate; or in accordance with data meeting the type 
certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing Company 
Designated Engineering Representative who has been authorized by the 
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a repair method to 
be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this 
paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must specifically reference 
this AD.

New Requirements of This AD

Modification

    (d) Prior to the accumulation of 60,000 total flight cycles, or 
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, 
whichever occurs later, accomplish an ultrasonic and HFEC inspection 
in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of this AD.
    (1) If no cracking is detected, prior to further flight, modify 
the rear spar web of the center section of the fuel tank between 
right BBL 40 and left BBL 40, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated 
September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, Revision 
1, dated February 25, 1999. Accomplishment of this modification 
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
requirements of this AD.
    (2) If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair 
and modify the rear spar web in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated 
September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, Revision 
1, dated February 25, 1999. Accomplishment of this modification 
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
requirements of this AD.

[[Page 43230]]

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (e)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit 
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance 
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
Seattle ACO.
    (2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in 
accordance with AD 97-25-15, amendment 39-10239, are approved as 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the Seattle ACO.

Special Flight Permits

    (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, provided the 
limitations specified in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(6) of this AD 
are included in the special flight permit:
    ``(1) Required trip and reserve fuel must be carried in the No. 
1 and No. 3 outer wing tanks.
    (2) Wing center tank No. 2 must be empty of fuel.
    (3) The fuel system must be checked for normal operation prior 
to flight by verifying that all boost pumps are operational; 
configuring the fuel system by turning on all boost pumps in the 
No.'s 1 and 3 outer wing tanks and by opening all crossfeed valve 
selectors; and by confirming that fuel is not bypassing tank No. 2 
check valves by observing that there is not leakage into tank No. 2.
    (4) Maintain a minimum of 5,300 pounds of fuel in tanks No. 1 
and No. 3 to prevent uncovering the fuel bypass valve.
    (5) The fuel quantity indication system must be operational in 
all three tanks.
    (6) The effects of loading fuel only in the wing tanks on the 
airplane weight and balance must be considered and accounted for.''

Incorporation by Reference

    (g) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD, the actions 
shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-
57A0182, dated September 18, 1997; or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-
57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999.
    (1) The incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin 
727-57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999, is approved by the 
Director of the Federal Register, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) 
and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) The incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated September 18, 1997, was approved 
previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of December 
29, 1997 (62 FR 65355, December 12, 1997).
    (3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane 
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be 
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

Effective Date

    (h) This amendment becomes effective on August 17, 2000.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 3, 2000.
Vi L. Lipski,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-17296 Filed 7-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Source: Official FAA Source ↗

Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026

Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain

This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.