AD 2000-14-07
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727-100 Series | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727-100C Series | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727-200 Series | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727-200F Series | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727 Series | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 727C Series | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracking of the rear spar web, which could permit fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an electrical short that could cause a fire.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Accomplish inspections to detect cracking of the rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section, using either a visual inspection with a borescope or mirror, or an ultrasonic and high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection. Repair any detected cracking or fuel leakage prior to further flight, in accordance with the specified service bulletins.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 300 flight cycles after December 27, 1997, or prior to the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, whichever occurs later.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 727 series airplanes with line numbers 858 through 864, 867 through 869, 872 through 883, and 885 through 1832, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section, and repair, if necessary. That action also provides for an optional modification of the rear spar web that constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment requires accomplishment of the previously optional terminating action. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent cracking of the rear spar web, which could permit fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an electrical short that could cause a fire.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 135 (Thursday, July 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43228-43230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-17296]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-75-AD; Amendment 39-11816; AD 2000-14-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes, that
currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the
rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section, and repair,
if necessary. That action also provides for an optional modification of
the rear spar web that constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. This amendment requires accomplishment of the
previously optional terminating action. The actions specified by this
AD are intended to prevent cracking of the rear spar web, which could
permit fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an
electrical short that could cause a fire.
DATES: Effective August 17, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin 727-
57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999, as listed in the
regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of
August 17, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
727-57A0182, dated September 18, 1997, as listed in the regulations,
was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of
December 29, 1997 (62 FR 65355, December 12, 1997).
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Sippel, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2774; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 97-25-15,
amendment 39-10239 (62 FR 65355, December 12, 1997), which is
applicable to certain Boeing Model 727 series airplanes, was published
in the Federal Register on October 6, 1999 (64 FR 54246). The action
proposed to require repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the
rear spar web or fuel leakage of the wing center section; repair, if
necessary; and modification of the rear spar web, which would
constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Support for the Proposal
One commenter supports the proposed rule.
Request To State Grace Period in Calendar Time
One commenter requests that the FAA revise the grace period in the
proposed rule from 3,000 flight cycles to 4 years after the effective
date of this AD. The commenter notes that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
727-57A0182 is listed in Boeing Document D6-54860, dated March 31,
1989, which is currently required by AD 90-06-09, amendment 39-6488 (55
FR 8370, March 7, 1990) and AD 94-05-04, amendment 39-8842 (59 FR
13442, March 22, 1994). The commenter states that these AD's currently
state a compliance threshold of 60,000 total flight cycles, with a
grace period of 4 years after the effective date of the AD. The
commenter requests that the proposed rule allow the same grace period
allowed by the existing AD's for the actions specified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 727-57A0182.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request. Boeing
Document D6-54860 addresses service problems related to both corrosion
(which is a function of time) and fatigue (which is a function of
flight cycles). Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182 is
listed in that document, this AD is a standalone AD concerned with
fatigue cracking of the rear spar web, which is related to flight
cycles. As a result, the FAA has determined that a grace period stated
in flight cycles is more appropriate than one stated in calendar time.
No change to the final rule is necessary in this regard.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 970 Model 727 series airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 659
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD: 641 ``Group 1''
airplanes and 18 ``Group 2'' airplanes, as listed in the service
bulletin.
The inspection that is currently required by AD 97-25-15 takes
approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $79,080, or $120 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
[[Page 43229]]
The new modification that is required in this AD action takes
approximately 60 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts cost approximately
$6,434 per airplane for ``Group 1'' airplanes, and $6,689 per airplane
for ``Group 2'' airplanes. Based on these figures, the cost impact of
the new modification required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $6,616,996, or $10,034 per ``Group 1'' airplane and $10,289 per
``Group 2'' airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-10239 (62 FR
65355, December 29, 1997), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), amendment 39-11816, to read as follows:
2000-14-07 Boeing: Amendment 39-11816. Docket 99-NM-75-AD.
Supersedes AD 97-25-15, Amendment 39-10239.
Applicability: Model 727 series airplanes having line numbers
858 through 864 inclusive, 867 through 869 inclusive, 872 through
883 inclusive, and 885 through 1832 inclusive; certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e)(1)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent cracking of the rear spar web, which could permit
fuel leakage into the airflow multiplier, and could result in an
electrical short that could cause a fire, accomplish the following:
Restatement of the Requirements of AD 97-25-15
Inspections
(a) Prior to the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or
within 300 flight cycles after December 27, 1997 (the effective date
of AD 97-25-15, amendment 39-10239), whichever occurs later:
Accomplish the inspections specified in either paragraph (a)(1) or
(a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
727-57A0182, dated September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin
727-57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999. For purposes of
the AD, the access panels specified in the alert service bulletin
need not be removed; the access panels need only be opened.
Note 2: The fuel tank of the wing center section may be filled
with fuel to assist in detecting cracking or fuel leakage during the
accomplishment of the visual inspections required by this AD.
(1) Perform a visual inspection using a borescope or mirror to
detect cracking of the rear spar web and/or fuel leakage of the wing
center section between right body buttock line (BBL) 40 and left BBL
40, in accordance with Part I of the Accomplishment Instructions of
the service bulletin. Thereafter, repeat this inspection at
intervals not to exceed 300 flight cycles. Or
(2) Perform an ultrasonic and high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection to detect cracking of the rear spar web of the wing
center section between right BBL 40 and left BBL 40, in accordance
with Part II of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Thereafter, repeat this inspection at intervals not to
exceed 3,000 flight cycles.
Repair
(b) If any cracking of the rear spar web and/or fuel leakage of
the wing center section is detected between right BBL 40 and left
BBL 40 near the upper machined land radius, prior to further flight,
repair in accordance with Part III of the Accomplishment
Instructions in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated
September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, Revision
1, dated February 25, 1999. Accomplishment of this repair
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD.
(c) If any cracking of the rear spar web and/or fuel leakage of
the wing center section is detected that is outside the area
specified in paragraph (b) of this AD, prior to further flight,
repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate; or in accordance with data meeting the type
certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing Company
Designated Engineering Representative who has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a repair method to
be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this
paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
New Requirements of This AD
Modification
(d) Prior to the accumulation of 60,000 total flight cycles, or
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, accomplish an ultrasonic and HFEC inspection
in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of this AD.
(1) If no cracking is detected, prior to further flight, modify
the rear spar web of the center section of the fuel tank between
right BBL 40 and left BBL 40, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated
September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, Revision
1, dated February 25, 1999. Accomplishment of this modification
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD.
(2) If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair
and modify the rear spar web in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated
September 18, 1997, or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-57A0182, Revision
1, dated February 25, 1999. Accomplishment of this modification
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD.
[[Page 43230]]
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(e)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in
accordance with AD 97-25-15, amendment 39-10239, are approved as
alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, provided the
limitations specified in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(6) of this AD
are included in the special flight permit:
``(1) Required trip and reserve fuel must be carried in the No.
1 and No. 3 outer wing tanks.
(2) Wing center tank No. 2 must be empty of fuel.
(3) The fuel system must be checked for normal operation prior
to flight by verifying that all boost pumps are operational;
configuring the fuel system by turning on all boost pumps in the
No.'s 1 and 3 outer wing tanks and by opening all crossfeed valve
selectors; and by confirming that fuel is not bypassing tank No. 2
check valves by observing that there is not leakage into tank No. 2.
(4) Maintain a minimum of 5,300 pounds of fuel in tanks No. 1
and No. 3 to prevent uncovering the fuel bypass valve.
(5) The fuel quantity indication system must be operational in
all three tanks.
(6) The effects of loading fuel only in the wing tanks on the
airplane weight and balance must be considered and accounted for.''
Incorporation by Reference
(g) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-
57A0182, dated September 18, 1997; or Boeing Service Bulletin 727-
57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999.
(1) The incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin
727-57A0182, Revision 1, dated February 25, 1999, is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 727-57A0182, dated September 18, 1997, was approved
previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of December
29, 1997 (62 FR 65355, December 12, 1997).
(3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(h) This amendment becomes effective on August 17, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 3, 2000.
Vi L. Lipski,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-17296 Filed 7-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.