AD 2000-10-20
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Lockheed Martin Corporation | L-1011-385-1 | Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Model L-1011-385 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Lockheed Martin Corporation | L-1011-385-1-14 | Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Model L-1011-385 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Lockheed Martin Corporation | L-1011-385-1-15 | Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Model L-1011-385 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Lockheed Martin Corporation | L-1011-385-3 | Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Model L-1011-385 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracks found in the fuselage skin where the skin thickness steps from 0.40 to 0.23 inch, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform an ultrasonic inspection on the fuselage skin in the area of the stringerless sidewall window belts, at the radii on both the forward and aft sides of the machined cutout where the fuselage skin steps from 0.40 to 0.23 inch, to detect cracking in the base of the radii. Depending on the inspection results, perform low frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections and repairs as specified in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-279.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 600 flight cycles or 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
All Lockheed Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, as listed in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-279, dated May 6, 1998; certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Lockheed Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the fuselage skin in the areas of the left- and right-hand stringerless sidewall window belts, and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports of fatigue cracks found in the fuselage skin where the skin thickness steps from 0.40 to 0.23 inch. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct cracking of the fuselage skin, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36053-36055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-14018]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-311-AD; Amendment 39-11744; AD 2000-10-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Model L-1011-385 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all Lockheed Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, that
requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the fuselage skin
in the areas of the left- and right-hand stringerless sidewall window
belts, and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports
of fatigue cracks found in the fuselage skin where the skin thickness
steps from 0.40 to 0.23 inch. The actions specified by this AD are
intended to detect and correct cracking of the fuselage skin, which
could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: Effective July 12, 2000. The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of July 12, 2000.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Lockheed Martin Aircraft & Logistics Center, 120 Orion
Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29605.
This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, One Crown
Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Peters, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ACE-116A, FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, One Crown Center,
1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia 30349; telephone
(770) 703-6063; fax (770) 703-6097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to all Lockheed Model L-1011-385
series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on February 16,
2000 (65 FR 7801). That action proposed to require require repetitive
inspections to detect cracking of the fuselage skin in the areas of the
left- and right-hand stringerless sidewall window belts, and repair, if
necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 235 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 117 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be
[[Page 36054]]
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 48 work hours per
airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that the average
labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $336,960, or
$2,880 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-10-20 Lockheed: Amendment 39-11744. Docket 98-NM-311-AD.
Applicability: All Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, as listed
in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-279, dated May 6, 1998;
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (f) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct cracking of the fuselage skin, which could
result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane, accomplish
the following:
(a) Perform an ultrasonic inspection on the fuselage skin in the
area of the stringerless sidewall window belts, at the radii on both
the forward and aft sides of the machined cutout where the fuselage
skin steps from 0.40 to 0.23 inch, to detect cracking in the base of
the radii. Accomplish the inspection in accordance with Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093-53-279, dated May 6, 1998, at each of the 6
specific inspection zones identified in the service bulletin at the
later of the times specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this
AD.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles; or
(2) Within 600 flight cycles or 6 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(b) For readings of less than 20 percent obtained at all 6
inspection zones during the ultrasonic inspection required by
paragraph (a) of this AD: Repeat the ultrasonic inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,500 flight cycles.
(c) Except as provided by paragraph (e) of this AD: For any
reading of 20 percent or greater and less than or equal to 50
percent obtained at any inspection zone during the ultrasonic
inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to further
flight, perform a low frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspection to
measure the depth of the cracking, in accordance with Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093-53-279, dated May 6, 1998.
(1) If the results of the LFEC inspection are outside the reject
zone, as defined in the service bulletin: Within 1,500 flight
cycles, repeat both the ultrasonic and LFEC inspections specified by
paragraphs (a) and (c), respectively, of this AD.
(i) If the results of the LFEC inspection specified by paragraph
(c)(1) of this AD are outside the reject zone: Within 1,800 flight
cycles after the initial crack finding, as detected during the
ultrasonic inspection specified in paragraph (a) of this AD, repair
any affected inspection zone in accordance with Part II of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Such repair
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD for the repaired inspection zone only.
(ii) If the results of the LFEC inspection specified by
paragraph (c)(1) of this AD are within the reject zone: Prior to
further flight, repair any affected inspection zone in accordance
with Part II of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Such repair constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements of this AD for the repaired
inspection zone only.
(2) If the results of the LFEC inspection are within the reject
zone, as defined in the service bulletin: Prior to further flight,
repair any affected inspection zone in accordance with Part II of
the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Such repair
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD for the repaired inspection zone only.
(d) Except as provided by paragraph (e) of this AD: For any
reading of 50 percent or greater obtained at any inspection zone
during the ultrasonic inspection required by paragraph (a) of this
AD, prior to further flight, perform a LFEC inspection to measure
the depth of the cracking, in accordance with Lockheed Service
Bulletin 093-53-279, dated May 6, 1998.
(1) If the results of the LFEC inspection are outside the reject
zone, as defined in the service bulletin: Within 300 flight cycles,
repeat both the ultrasonic and LFEC inspections specified in
paragraphs (a) and (c), respectively, of this AD.
(i) If the results of the LFEC inspection specified by paragraph
(d)(1) of this AD are outside the reject zone: Within 600 flight
cycles after the initial crack finding, as detected during the
ultrasonic inspection specified in paragraph (a) of this AD, repair
any affected inspection zone in accordance with Part II of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Such repair
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD for the repaired inspection zone only.
(ii) If the results of the LFEC inspection specified by
paragraph (d)(1) of this AD are within the reject zone: Prior to
further flight, repair any affected inspection zone in accordance
with Part II of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Such repair constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements of this AD for the repaired
inspection zone only.
(2) If the results from the LFEC inspection are within the
reject zone, as defined in the service bulletin: Prior to further
flight, repair any affected inspection zone in accordance with Part
II of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Such
repair constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD for the repaired inspection zone only.
(e) For any inspection results that require repair in two
adjacent zones: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a
method approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate.
[[Page 36055]]
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Atlanta ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Atlanta ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(g) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(h) Except as provided by paragraph (e) of this AD, the actions
shall be done in accordance with Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-53-
279, dated May 6, 1998. This incorporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Lockheed
Martin Aircraft & Logistics Center, 120 Orion Street, Greenville,
South Carolina 29605. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office, One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard,
suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(i) This amendment becomes effective on July 12, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 17, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-14018 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.