AD 2000-10-12
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | 747-400 | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracking and buckling of the front edge of the crew rest heat exchanger, which could result in jamming of the rudder or elevator control cables and reduced controllability of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a general visual inspection of the crew rest heat exchanger to detect deflection or damage, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2412. Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight hours. If damage or deflection is found, replace the affected heat exchanger and measure the thickness of the material. If the thickness is within specified limits, return the discrepant heat exchanger to Boeing.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 1,200 flight hours or 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 747-400 series airplanes, line numbers 1 through 1205 inclusive, certificated in any category, and equipped with dual crown skin heat exchangers.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747- 400 series airplanes. This action requires repetitive inspections to detect damage or deflection of the crew rest heat exchanger, and follow-on actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports of cracking and buckling of the front edge of the crew rest heat exchanger on several airplanes. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect and correct damage or deflection of the crew rest heat exchanger, which could result in jamming of the rudder or elevator control cables, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33444-33446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-12671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-75-AD; Amendment 39-11736; AD 2000-10-12]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-
[[Page 33445]]
400 series airplanes. This action requires repetitive inspections to
detect damage or deflection of the crew rest heat exchanger, and
follow-on actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports
of cracking and buckling of the front edge of the crew rest heat
exchanger on several airplanes. The actions specified in this AD are
intended to detect and correct damage or deflection of the crew rest
heat exchanger, which could result in jamming of the rudder or elevator
control cables, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: Effective June 8, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 8, 2000.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before July 24, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-75-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Mudrovich, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2983; fax (425)
227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has received reports indicating that
cracking and buckling of the forward edge of the crew rest heat
exchanger has been found on several airplanes. Investigation revealed
that certain heat exchangers were manufactured with material that is
too thin. On one airplane, the heat exchanger buckled and bulged enough
to make contact with the rudder and elevator cables located below the
heat exchanger. Such contact between the heat exchanger and the rudder
and elevator control cables could eventually dislodge pieces of the
heat exchanger or adjacent fasteners. Dislodged pieces or fasteners
could cause a jam of the rudder or elevator control cables. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in reduced controllability of
the airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-21A2412, dated January 20, 2000. The alert service bulletin
describes procedures for repetitive general visual inspections to
detect damage or deflection of the crew rest heat exchanger, and
follow-on actions, if necessary. If damage or deflection is found,
follow-on actions include replacement of the affected heat exchanger
with a new heat exchanger, and measurement of the thickness of material
of the discrepant heat exchanger. If the thickness of the material is
within certain limits, the alert service bulletin specifies that the
discrepant heat exchanger should be returned to Boeing.
Explanation of Requirements of the Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design, this AD is
being issued to detect and correct cracking or buckling of the crew
rest heat exchanger, which could result jamming of the rudder or
elevator control cables, and consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane. This AD requires accomplishment of the actions specified in
the alert service bulletin described previously, except as discussed
below.
Difference Between This AD and the Alert Service Bulletin
Operators should note that there is a typographical error in the
Accomplishment Instructions on page 10 of the alert service bulletin.
Item G. under the heading ``Inspection and Replacement of the Heat
Exchanger (All Airplanes)'' reads, ``If the material thickness is
between 0.028--0.034 inches[,] send the damaged heat exchanger and your
inspection results to Boeing.'' The number ``0.034'' should read
``0.038.'' ``NOTE 3'' has been included in this AD for clarification of
this point.
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim action until final action is
identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
Cost Impact
None of the airplanes affected by this action are on the U.S.
Register. All airplanes included in the applicability of this rule
currently are operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign registry;
therefore, they are not directly affected by this AD action. However,
the FAA considers that this rule is necessary to ensure that the unsafe
condition is addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes
are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S.
Register in the future, it would require approximately 1 work hour to
accomplish the required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD would be
$60 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since this AD action does not affect any airplane that is currently
on the U.S. register, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no
additional burden on any person. Therefore, prior notice and public
procedures hereon are unnecessary and the amendment may be made
effective in less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not
preceded by notice and opportunity for public comment, comments are
invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this
rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may
desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be
submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption
ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date
for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light
of the comments received. Factual information that supports the
commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating
the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional
rulemaking action would be needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must
[[Page 33446]]
submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following
statement is made: ``Comments to Docket Number 2000-NM-75-AD.'' The
postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-10-12 Boeing: Amendment 39-11736. Docket 2000-NM-75-AD.
Applicability: Model 747-400 series airplanes, line numbers 1
through 1205 inclusive, certificated in any category, and equipped
with dual crown skin heat exchangers.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct damage or deflection of the crew rest heat
exchanger, which could result in jamming of the rudder or elevator
control cables, and consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Repetitive Inspections
(a) Within 1,200 flight hours or 90 days after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform a general visual
inspection of the crew rest heat exchanger to detect deflection or
damage, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
21A2412, dated January 20, 2000. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight hours.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
Corrective Action
(b) If any damage or deflection is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to further
flight, replace the discrepant heat exchanger with a new heat
exchanger, and measure the thickness of the material of the
discrepant heat exchanger, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-21A2412, dated January 20, 2000. If the material is
greater than or equal to 0.028 inches thick but less than or equal
to 0.038 inches thick (<gr-thn-eq> 0.028 but <ls-thn-eq> 0.038
inches thick), send the damaged heat exchanger and inspection
results to the Manager of Service Bulletin Engineering, Boeing
Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124.
Note 3: There is a typographical error in the Accomplishment
Instructions on page 10 of the alert service bulletin. Item G. under
the heading ``Inspection and Replacement of the Heat Exchanger (All
Airplanes)'' reads, ``If the material thickness is between 0.028--
0.034 inches[,] send the damaged heat exchanger and your inspection
results to Boeing.'' The number ``0.034'' should read ``0.038.''
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-21A2412, dated January 20, 2000. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on June 8, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 15, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-12671 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.