AD 2000-10-03
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | McDonnell Douglas | DC-10 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Chafing of the wire bundle located behind the flight engineer's panel caused by the wire bundle coming in contact with the lower edge of the feed through, leading to electrical arcing, which could result in smoke and fire in the cockpit.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a one-time detailed visual inspection to determine if the wire segments of the wire bundle routed through the feed through on the aft side of the flight engineer's station are damaged or chafed. If damaged or chafed wire is found, repair the wiring prior to further flight. For Group 2 airplanes, revise the wire bundle support clamp installation at the flight engineer's station within 1 year after the effective date of the AD, unless damaged or chafed wire is found, in which case the revision must be done prior to further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 1 year after the effective date of the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
All McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 series airplanes, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 series airplanes, that requires a one-time detailed visual inspection to determine if wire segments of the wire bundle routed through the feed through on the aft side of the flight engineer's station are damaged or chafed, and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report of smoke coming out of the flight engineer's upper right circuit breaker panel, which was followed by circuit breakers popping and the panel lights going out. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent chafing of the wire bundle located behind the flight engineer's panel caused by the wire bundle coming in contact with the lower edge of the feed through and consequent electrical arcing, which could result in smoke and fire in the cockpit.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31253-31255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-11950]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-213-AD; Amendment 39-11727; AD 2000-10-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 series airplanes, that
requires a one-time detailed visual inspection to determine if wire
segments of the wire bundle routed through the feed through on the aft
side of the flight engineer's station are damaged or chafed, and
corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a
report of smoke coming out of the flight engineer's upper right circuit
breaker panel, which was followed by circuit breakers popping and the
panel lights going out. The actions specified by this AD are intended
to prevent chafing of the wire bundle located behind the flight
engineer's panel caused by the wire bundle coming in contact with the
lower edge of the feed through and consequent electrical arcing, which
could result in smoke and fire in the cockpit.
DATES: Effective June 21, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 21, 2000.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60).
This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA),
[[Page 31254]]
Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Natalie Phan-Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5343;
fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10
series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on January 26,
2000 (65 FR 4186). That action proposed to require a one-time detailed
visual inspection to determine if wire segments of the wire bundle
routed through the feed through on the aft side of the flight
engineer's station are damaged or chafed, and corrective actions, if
necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
One commenter supports the proposed rule. Another commenter
supports the proposed rule and indicates that it is in the process of
accomplishing the subject inspection. A third commenter supports the
proposed rule and indicates that it has completed the subject
inspection.
Explanation of Change Made
Paragraph (a) of this AD has been changed to correct a
typographical error that resulted in a reference to an incorrect alert
service bulletin revision date. That paragraph references ``McDonnell
Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC10-24A149, Revision 01, dated May 6,
1999,'' as the appropriate source of service information for
accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph (a) of the
proposed AD. This AD references the appropriate alert service bulletin
as ``McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC10-24A149, Revision 01,
dated July 28, 1999.''
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously
described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 412 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 300 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work
hour per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $18,000, or
$60 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-10-03 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-11727. Docket 99-NM-213-
AD.
Applicability: All Model DC-10 series airplanes, certificated in
any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent chafing of the wire bundle located behind the flight
engineer's panel caused by the wire bundle coming in contact with
the lower edge of the feed through and consequent electrical arcing,
which could result in smoke and fire in the cockpit, accomplish the
following:
Inspection
(a) Within 1 year after the effective date of this AD, perform a
one-time detailed visual inspection to determine if the wire
segments of the wire bundle routed through the feed through on the
aft side of the flight engineer's station are damaged or chafed, in
accordance with McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC10-
24A149, Revision 01, dated July 28, 1999.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
[[Page 31255]]
Corrective Actions
(1) For airplanes identified as Group 1 in the alert service
bulletin: Accomplish paragraph (a)(1)(i) or (a)(1)(ii) of this AD,
as applicable.
(i) If no damaged or chafed wire is found, no further action is
required by this AD.
(ii) If any damaged or chafed wire is found, prior to further
flight, repair in accordance with the alert service bulletin.
(2) For airplanes identified as Group 2 in the alert service
bulletin: Accomplish paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (a)(2)(ii) of this AD,
as applicable.
(i) If no damaged or chafed wire is found, within 1 year after
the effective date of this AD, revise the wire bundle support clamp
installation at the flight engineer's station in accordance with the
alert service bulletin.
(ii) If any damaged or chafed wire is found, prior to further
flight, repair the wiring, and revise the wire bundle support clamp
installation at the flight engineer's station, in accordance with
the alert service bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Alert Service Bulletin DC10-24A149, Revision 01, dated July
28, 1999. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial
Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long
Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business
Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on June 21, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 8, 2000.
Vi L. Lipski,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-11950 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.