AD 2000-08-11
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| engine | General Electric | Company CF6-6 | Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-6, CF6-45, and CF6-50 Series Turbofan Engines |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of critical life-limited rotating engine parts, specifically the high pressure turbine rotor (HPTR) Stage 1 and 2 disks, could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Revise the airworthiness limitations section in the manufacturer's manual to incorporate additional eddy current inspections (ECI) for the HPTR Stage 1 and 2 disks. Modify the air carrier's approved continuous airworthiness maintenance program to include these new inspection procedures.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 180 days after publication of the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
General Electric Company CF6-6, CF6-45, and CF6-50 series turbofan engines.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-6, CF6-45, and CF6-50 series turbofan engines, that requires revisions to the Time Limits Section of the manufacturer's Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) to include required enhanced inspection of selected critical life-limited parts at each piece-part exposure. This action would add additional eddy current inspections (ECI) for the high pressure turbine rotor (HPTR) Stage 1 and 2 disks. This action is prompted by additional focused inspection procedures that have been developed by the manufacturer. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent critical life-limited rotating engine part failure, which could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21636-21638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-10158]
[[Page 21636]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-ANE-41-AD; Amendment 39-11697; AD 2000-08-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-6, CF6-45,
and CF6-50 Series Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-6, CF6-45, and
CF6-50 series turbofan engines, that requires revisions to the Time
Limits Section of the manufacturer's Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICA) to include required enhanced inspection of selected
critical life-limited parts at each piece-part exposure. This action
would add additional eddy current inspections (ECI) for the high
pressure turbine rotor (HPTR) Stage 1 and 2 disks. This action is
prompted by additional focused inspection procedures that have been
developed by the manufacturer. The actions specified by this AD are
intended to prevent critical life-limited rotating engine part failure,
which could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to the
airplane.
DATES: Effective date October 23, 2000.
ADDRESSES: The information referenced in this AD may be examined at the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Curtis, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781)
238-7192, fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 99-08-18,
Amendment 39-11124 (64 FR 17958, April 13, 1999) which is applicable to
General Electric Company (GE) CF6-6, CF6-45, and CF6-50 series turbofan
engines was published in the Federal Register on October 7, 1999 (64 FR
54587). That action proposed to require disk bore eddy current
inspections (ECI) for the high pressure turbine rotor (HPTR) Stage 1
and 2 disks.
New Inspection Procedures
Since the issuance of that AD, additional focused inspection
procedures for other critical life-limited rotating engine parts have
been developed by GE. This AD will require modification of the
airworthiness limitations section in the manufacturers manual and an
air carrier's approved continuous airworthiness maintenance program to
incorporate these inspection procedures.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Objection to the Term ``Unsafe Condition'' in the Preamble of the
NPRM
Two commenters object to the language in the preamble of the NPRM
supersedure for the second phase of enhanced inspections which includes
a finding of an ``unsafe condition.'' The commenters asks that the term
``unsafe condition'' be deleted and replaced with the justification
language from the original NPRM. The FAA does not agree. The commenter
does not disagree with the proposed rule itself but rather with the
term ``unsafe condition'' that is contained in the preamble to the
NPRM. It is not the intent of the FAA to completely change the enhanced
disk inspection program established by the current AD, which evolved as
a cooperative effort between the FAA and industry. This intervention
strategy was designed to reduce the number of uncontained engine
failures by mandating enhanced nondestructive inspections of critical
rotating components that could most likely result in a hazard to the
airplane in the event of a failure. Since the engine maintenance
manuals did not mandate these enhanced inspections, the current AD was
necessary to establish the inspection program as an airworthiness
limitation. Regardless of the fact that it was not stated explicitly in
the original NPRM, the FAA determined that an ``unsafe condition''
existed because the engine maintenance manuals did not contain enhanced
inspections as an airworthiness limitation. There was no intent to
imply any defect in the actual engine hardware, but simply to state
that the maintenance manuals, that form part of the approved engine
design, must be revised to mandate the enhanced inspections. The
supersedure repeats that finding with respect to the additional parts
being added to the enhanced inspection program. Because a finding of an
``unsafe condition'' is required for the FAA to issue an AD, future
NPRM's adding parts to the program will also include that finding.
Requests To Add an Explanation to the Preamble of This AD, of When
the Inspections Are Not Required
Several commenters request that the FAA change the preamble that
was published in the NPRM to state when the enhanced inspections are
not required. The commenters note that the preamble to this NPRM does
not contain an explanation as to when the enhanced disk inspections are
not required and express concern that the inspection program has been
changed from the current AD. The FAA does not agree. The inspection
program established by the current AD has not been changed. The NPRM
adds additional parts to the list of parts that must be inspected, and
does not change how air carriers must manage the inspection program.
Future AD's may be issued to introduce additional intervention
strategies in order to further reduce uncontained engine failures.These
may include AD's to add new parts to the list of parts to be inspected.
The inspection program established by the current AD will remain
unchanged unless specifically changed in a future proposal.
Request to Change All References From ``Time Limits Section'' to
``Airworthiness Limitations Section''
One commenter, the engine manufacturer, asks that we change
references to the ``Time Limits Section'' to read instead the
``revision to the Airworthiness Limitations Section.'' The commenter
feels that it is more accurate to refer to the Airworthiness Limitation
Section since this section, Chapter 5, now contains two subsets; 05-11
for Time Limits and 05-21 for the mandatory inspections. The FAA does
not agree. The manufacturer's current engine manual does not include
the heading ``Airworthiness Limitations'' for Chapter 05-00-00 for
these engine models, and the AD directs that changes be made to the
current manual. Should the manufacturer revise the section headings in
the manual, any future AD's could then reference the revised section
headings.
Request for Clarification of When FAA Approval or AMOC Is Required
One commenter requests clarification be added to this AD on when
equivalent substitutes for tools, equipment, or procedures used for
performing the mandatory enhanced inspections require FAA approval or
an approved alternate method of compliance (AMOC).
[[Page 21637]]
The FAA does not agree that further clarification is necessary in
the AD. When allowed for in an AD, an AMOC provides a method by which
an operator may secure FAA approval for complying with the requirements
of that AD in a manner or at a time other than specified by the AD.
This AD, and other similar AD's issued as part of the so-called Disk
Inspection Initiative of the Safer Skies Program, are intended to
address the need to include mandatory detail inspections in the FAA
approved portion of the engine maintenance manual. This portion of the
engine maintenance manual is sometimes referred to as the Airworthiness
Limitations Sections (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness. The FAA does not intend that this AD specify the exact
method or tools with which to conduct the inspection. Rather, the AD
requires only that the ALS be revised to include a mandatory
opportunistic inspection. The FAA also does not intend that this AD
change the manner in which operators seek approval to use tools or
methods of inspections other than those provided for in the engine
manufacturer's manual. Operators, particularly air carriers, should
follow the procedures already in place to secure FAA review and
approval to use such substitutes, if needed, and to document that
approval if necessary. Therefore, the AMOC paragraph in the AD will
remain as proposed.
Request To Extend the Comment Period
One commenter requests that the NPRM comment period be extended
until after the proposed inspections are published to allow time for
the operators to review the specific inspections that will be required.
The FAA does not agree. The FAA believes that the nature and scope of
the added inspections will not be significantly different from existing
inspections. In addition, the effective date of this AD has been
extended to 180 days after publication to allow time for the specific
procedures to be published. Operators may submit comments on the
specific procedures once they are published and the FAA will consider
extending the effective date further or additional rulemaking, as
necessary. The FAA does not believe, however, that this final rule need
be delayed pending the publication of the inspection procedures.
Request To Allow a Later Effective Date
Several commenters request that the effective date of the AD be set
to allow sufficient time for publication of the procedures, equipment
procurement and training necessary to perform the mandatory inspection.
The FAA agrees. The effective date for the Final rule has been extended
to 180 days after publication to allow sufficient time for the
publication of the inspection procedures and for operators to prepare.
Request to Remove ``of This Chapter'' From Paragraph (e) of the
Compliance Section
One commenter requests that the FAA remove the statement ``of this
chapter'' from the first sentence of paragraph (e) of this AD. The
commenter feels that removing the statement will improve the clarity of
the paragraph. The FAA agrees. The statement ``of this chapter'' has
been removed from the first sentence of paragraph (e).
Economic Analysis
No comments were received on the economic analysis contained in the
proposed rules. The FAA has determined that the annual cost of
complying with this AD does not create a significant economic impact on
small entities.
Adoption of the Proposed Rule
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described
previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Regulatory Impact
This final rule does not have federalism implications, as defined
in Executive Order 13132, because it does not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
the FAA has not consulted with state authorities prior to publication
of this final rule.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air Transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-11124 (64 FR
17958, April 13, 1999), and by adding a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39-11697, to read as follows:
AD 2000-08-11 General Electric Company: Amendment 39-11697. Docket
No. 98-ANE-41-AD. Supersedes AD 99-08-18, Amendment 39-11124.
Applicable Engines
General Electric Company (GE) CF6-6, CF6-45, and CF6-50 series
turbofan engines, installed on but not limited to Airbus Industrie
A300 series, Boeing 747 series, and McDonnell Douglas DC-10 series
airplanes.
Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine
identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of
whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area
subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been
modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the
requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment
of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the
unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition
has not been eliminated, the request should include specific
proposed actions to address it.
Compliance
Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.
To prevent critical life-limited rotating engine part failure,
which could result in an uncontained engine failure and damage to
the airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspections
(a) Within the next 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
revise the manufacturer's Time Limitations Section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
[[Page 21638]]
(ICA), and for air carrier operations revise the approved continuous
airworthiness maintenance program, by adding the following:
``MANDATORY INSPECTIONS
(1) Perform inspections of the following parts at each piece-
part opportunity in accordance with the instructions provided in the
applicable manual provisions:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect per engine
Part nomenclature Part No. (P/N) shop manual chapter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For CF6-6 Engines:
Disk, Fan Rotor Stage One. All.............. 72-21-03 Paragraph
2.F. or Paragraph
2.A.B. Fluorescent-
Penetrant Inspect,
and 72-21-03
Paragraph 3 or 3.A.
Eddy Current
Inspection.
Disk, HPT Rotor Stage One. All.............. 72-53-03 Paragraph 1.
Fluorescent-
Penetrant Inspect,
and 72-53-03
Paragraph 4. Eddy
Current Inspection
of the HPTR Disk Rim
Boltholes and 72-53-
03 Paragraph 5. Disk
Bore Area Eddy
Current Inspection.
Disk, HPT Rotor Stage Two. All.............. 72-53-04 Paragraph 1.
Fluorescent-
Penetrant Inspect,
and Paragraph 4.
Eddy Current
Inspection of the
Stage 2 HPTR Disk
Rim Boltholes and 72-
53-04 Paragraph 5.
Eddy Current
Inspection of the
Stage 2 Disk Inner
Boltholes and 72-53-
04 Paragraph 6. Disk
Bore Area Eddy
Current Inspection
For CF6-45, CF6-50 Engines:
Disk, Fan Rotor Stage One. All.............. Task 72-21-03-230-051
Fluorescent
Penetrant
Inspection, and Task
72-21-03-250-002-052
Manual Eddy Current
Inspection or 72-21-
03-250-003-053
Automated Eddy
Current Inspection.
Disk, HPT Rotor Stage One. All.............. Task 72-53-03-230-001-
059 Fluorescent-
Penetrant Inspect
Disk, and Task 72-53-
03-250-052 Eddy
Current Inspection
of the HPTR Stage 1
Rim Boltholes, and
Task 72-53-03-250-
060, Disk Bore Area
Eddy Current
Inspection.
Disk, HPT Rotor Stage Two. All.............. Task 72-53-04-230-001-
057 Fluorescent-
Penetrant Inspect
Disk, and Task 72-53-
04-250-053 Eddy
Current Inspection
of the HPTR Stage 2
Rim and/or Inner
Boltholes, and Task
72-53-04-250-060,
Disk Bore Area Eddy
Current Inspection.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) For the purposes of these mandatory inspections, piece-part
opportunity means:
(i) The part is considered completely disassembled when
accomplished in accordance with the disassembly instructions in the
manufacturer's engine manual; and
(ii) The part has accumulated more than 100 cycles in service
since the last piece-part opportunity inspection, provided that the
part was not damaged or related to the cause for its removal from
the engine.''
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this AD, and
notwithstanding contrary provisions in section 43.16 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.16), these mandatory inspections
shall be performed only in accordance with the Time Limits Section
of the manufacturer's ICA.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Engine Certification Office (ECO). Operators
shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
ECO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the ECO.
Ferry Flights
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Program
(e) FAA-certificated air carriers that have an approved
continuous airworthiness maintenance program in accordance with the
record keeping requirement of Sec. 121.369 (c) of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.369 (c)) must maintain records of
the mandatory inspections that result from revising the Time Limits
Section of the ICA and the air carrier's continuous airworthiness
program. Alternately, certificated air carriers may establish an
approved system of record retention that provides a method for
preservation and retrieval of the maintenance records that include
the inspections resulting from this AD, and include the policy and
procedures for implementing this alternate method in the air
carrier's maintenance manual required by Sec. 121.369 (c) of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.369 (c)); however, the
alternate system must be accepted by the appropriate PMI and require
the maintenance records be maintained either indefinitely or until
the work is repeated. Records of the piece-part inspections are not
required under Sec. 121.380 (a) (2) (vi) of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 121.380 (a) (2) (vi)). All other Operators must
maintain the records of mandatory inspections required by the
applicable regulations governing their operations.
Note 3: The requirements of this AD have been met when the
engine shop manual changes are made and air carriers have modified
their continuous airworthiness maintenance plans to reflect the
requirements in the engine shop manuals.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on October 23, 2000.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on April 14, 2000.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-10158 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.