AD 2000-03-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-200C Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
The existing emergency floor path lighting system does not provide adequate lighting and cueing for safe evacuation of the airplane in the event of an emergency.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Remove the existing emergency floor path lighting system and replace it with an FAA-approved emergency floor path lighting system.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 737-200 series airplanes modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00969AT.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-200 series airplanes that requires removal of the existing emergency floor path lighting system and replacement with an FAA-approved emergency floor path lighting system. This amendment is prompted by information indicating that the existing emergency floor path lighting system does not provide adequate lighting and cueing for safe evacuation of the airplane in the event of an emergency. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such inadequate lighting and cueing, which could delay or impede the flight crew and passengers when exiting the airplane during an emergency.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6534-6535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-3131]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 96-NM-226-AD; Amendment 39-11562; AD 2000-03-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-200 Series Airplanes
Modified in Accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00969AT
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-200 series airplanes that
requires removal of the existing emergency floor path lighting system
and replacement with an FAA-approved emergency floor path lighting
system. This amendment is prompted by information indicating that the
existing emergency floor path lighting system does not provide adequate
lighting and cueing for safe evacuation of the airplane in the event of
an emergency. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent
such inadequate lighting and cueing, which could delay or impede the
flight crew and passengers when exiting the airplane during an
emergency.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 16, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Information pertaining to this amendment may be examined at
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane
Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington;
or at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Campus Building, 1701
Columbia Avenue, Suite 2-160, College Park, Georgia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Evans, Aerospace Engineer, ACE-
116A, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Atlanta Aircraft Certification
Office, One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta,
Georgia 30349; telephone (770) 703-6081; fax (770) 703-6097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-200
series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on June 23, 1999
(64 FR 33443). That action proposed to require removal of the existing
emergency floor path lighting system and replacement with an FAA-
approved emergency floor path lighting system. That proposal was
prompted by information indicating that the existing emergency floor
path lighting system does not provide adequate lighting and cueing for
safe evacuation of the airplane in the event of an emergency. The
actions specified by that proposal are intended to prevent such
inadequate lighting and cueing, which could delay or impede the flight
crew and passengers when exiting the airplane during an emergency.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
One commenter concurs with the proposed rule.
Another commenter requests that the compliance time be extended to
six months so that it will have adequate time to integrate the affected
airplanes into the maintenance cycle.
The FAA concurs. The FAA has determined that such an extension of
the compliance time to within 6 months after the effective date of the
AD will not adversely affect safety. The final rule has been revised
accordingly.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously
described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 40 Boeing Model 737-200 series airplanes of
the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 4
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will
take approximately 12 work hours per airplane to accomplish the removal
of the system, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. It
will take approximately 40 work hours per airplane to accomplish the
required replacement with an FAA-approved system. Required parts for
the replacement will cost approximately $10,000 for a new system, per
airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S.
operators is estimated to be $524,800, or $13,120 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action: (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
[[Page 6535]]
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared
for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it
may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under
the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-03-05 Boeing: Amendment 39-11562. Docket 96-NM-226-AD.
Applicability: Model 737-200 series airplanes equipped with SAF-
T-GL0 Aerospace Limited emergency floor path lighting systems
installed in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00969AT, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent inadequate lighting and cueing of the emergency floor
path lighting system, which could delay or impede the flight crew
and passengers when exiting the airplane during an emergency,
accomplish the following:
(a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, remove
the existing photoluminescent emergency floor path lighting system
from the airplane. Replace it with an emergency floor path lighting
system in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate ST01829AT,
dated February 11, 1999, or an FAA-approved emergency floor path
lighting system that is installed in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Atlanta ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Atlanta ACO.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) This amendment becomes effective on March 16, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 4, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-3131 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.