AD 2000-01-18
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-11 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-12 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-21 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-31 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-32 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-33 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-41 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-42 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-43 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-51 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-52 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-53 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-55 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-61 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-61F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-62 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-62F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-63 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-63F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-71 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-71F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-72 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-72F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-73 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8-73F | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8F-54 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-8F-55 | Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Stress corrosion cracking in the forward tang of the lower caps of the wing front spar, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the wing.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Conduct a one-time eddy current conductivity test to determine the material type of the lower cap of the wing front spar. Modify the lower cap of the wing front spar, if necessary, to prevent stress corrosion cracking.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes, as specified in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes, that requires a one-time eddy current conductivity test to determine the material type of the lower cap of the wing front spar; and modification of the lower cap of the wing front spar, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports of stress corrosion cracking in the forward tang of the lower caps of the wing front spar. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such stress corrosion cracking, which if not corrected, could result in reduced structural integrity of the wing.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2862-2864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-1119]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-217-AD; Amendment 39-11516; AD 2000-01-18]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8 series airplanes,
that requires a one-time eddy current conductivity test to determine
the material type of the lower cap of the wing front spar; and
modification of the lower cap of the wing front spar, if necessary.
This amendment is prompted by reports of stress corrosion cracking in
the forward tang of the lower caps of the wing front spar. The actions
specified by this AD are intended to prevent such stress corrosion
cracking, which if not corrected, could result in reduced structural
integrity of the wing.
DATES: Effective February 23, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 23, 2000.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention:
Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60).
This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
[[Page 2863]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg DiLibero, Airframe Branch, ANM-
120L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5231; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
DC-8 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on October
27, 1999 (64 FR 57792). That action proposed to require a one-time eddy
current conductivity test to determine the material type of the lower
cap of the wing front spar; and modification of the lower cap of the
wing front spar, if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the single comment received.
The commenter supports the proposed rule.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 294 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 251 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 3 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $45,180, or
$180 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of
this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in
the future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action: (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-01-18 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-11516. Docket 99-NM-21-
AD.
Applicability: Model DC-8 series airplanes, as listed in
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-030, Revision 05, dated
April 28, 1998; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent stress corrosion cracking of the lower cap of the
wing front spar, which if not corrected, could result in reduced
structural integrity of the wing, accomplish the following:
(a) Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a one-time eddy current conductivity test to determine the
material type of the forward tang of the lower cap of the front spar
in the center section of the wing, in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-030, Revision 05, dated April 28,
1998, or Revision 04, dated August 17, 1995.
(1) If 7079-T6 aluminum is not found, no further action is
required by this AD.
(2) If any 7079-T6 aluminum is found, within 48 months after the
effective date of this AD, modify the forward tang of the lower cap
of the front spar, in accordance with the service bulletin.
(b) Accomplishment of the eddy current conductivity test, and
modification, if necessary, specified in paragraph (a) of this AD
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of paragraph (a) of AD 90-16-05, amendment 39-6614, as
it applies to the inspections of the forward tang of the lower cap
of the front spar specified in McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin
DC8-57-030, Revision 3, dated December 10, 1970.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-030, Revision 05, dated April 28,
1998, or McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8-57-030, Revision 04,
dated August 17, 1995. This incorporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing
Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical
Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies
may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the
[[Page 2864]]
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on February 23, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 11, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-1119 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.